妊娠糖尿病对女性性功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mahsa Maghalian, Mojgan Mirghafourvand
{"title":"妊娠糖尿病对女性性功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mahsa Maghalian, Mojgan Mirghafourvand","doi":"10.1186/s12902-024-01781-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication with well-established adverse effects on maternal and fetal health. However, research on its impact on sexual health is inconsistent. Currently, there is no comprehensive review on sexual function in pregnant women with GDM. The purpose of this study is to systematically gather and synthesize the available evidence, addressing this important research gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis utilized a comprehensive literature search strategy and incorporated the following databases: the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, SID, and Google Scholar. The search was conducted until February 21, 2024. The quality of the cross-sectional and case‒control studies included in the current study was evaluated via the modified and standard Newcastle‒Ottawa scale. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. A meta-regression was conducted to examine the variables that influence total sexual function. Additionally, sequential analysis was performed to determine the required information size for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic search process yielded a total of 370 studies. The final analysis included six studies. The meta-analysis findings revealed that compared with controls, women with GDM had significantly lower total scores for sexual function (SMD - 1.80, 95% CI -3.44 to -0.15, p = 0.03), sexual desire (SMD - 5.14, 95% CI -8.14 to -2.14, p < 0.001), arousal (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.21, p = 0.002), lubrication (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.22, p < 0.001) and satisfaction (SMD - 3.82, 95% CI -6.08 to -1.57, p < 0.001). However, the analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences in sexual pain, or orgasm between the GDM and control groups. The meta-regression analysis revealed that older age in the control group was associated with poorer sexual function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with control women, pregnant women diagnosed with GDM have lower sexual function. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary to enhance the robustness of the evidence, given the low level of certainty. Healthcare providers should focus on the sexual well-being of women with GDM and create tailored interventions to address their specific needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on women's sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mahsa Maghalian, Mojgan Mirghafourvand\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12902-024-01781-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication with well-established adverse effects on maternal and fetal health. However, research on its impact on sexual health is inconsistent. Currently, there is no comprehensive review on sexual function in pregnant women with GDM. The purpose of this study is to systematically gather and synthesize the available evidence, addressing this important research gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis utilized a comprehensive literature search strategy and incorporated the following databases: the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, SID, and Google Scholar. The search was conducted until February 21, 2024. The quality of the cross-sectional and case‒control studies included in the current study was evaluated via the modified and standard Newcastle‒Ottawa scale. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. A meta-regression was conducted to examine the variables that influence total sexual function. Additionally, sequential analysis was performed to determine the required information size for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic search process yielded a total of 370 studies. The final analysis included six studies. The meta-analysis findings revealed that compared with controls, women with GDM had significantly lower total scores for sexual function (SMD - 1.80, 95% CI -3.44 to -0.15, p = 0.03), sexual desire (SMD - 5.14, 95% CI -8.14 to -2.14, p < 0.001), arousal (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.21, p = 0.002), lubrication (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.22, p < 0.001) and satisfaction (SMD - 3.82, 95% CI -6.08 to -1.57, p < 0.001). However, the analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences in sexual pain, or orgasm between the GDM and control groups. The meta-regression analysis revealed that older age in the control group was associated with poorer sexual function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with control women, pregnant women diagnosed with GDM have lower sexual function. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary to enhance the robustness of the evidence, given the low level of certainty. Healthcare providers should focus on the sexual well-being of women with GDM and create tailored interventions to address their specific needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Endocrine Disorders\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566885/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Endocrine Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01781-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01781-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠糖尿病(GDM)是一种常见的妊娠并发症,对母体和胎儿健康的不利影响已得到公认。然而,有关其对性健康影响的研究却并不一致。目前,还没有关于 GDM 孕妇性功能的全面综述。本研究的目的是系统地收集和综合现有证据,填补这一重要的研究空白:本系统综述和荟萃分析采用了全面的文献检索策略,并纳入了以下数据库:Cochrane Library、Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science、SID 和 Google Scholar。检索截止到 2024 年 2 月 21 日。本研究中纳入的横断面研究和病例对照研究的质量通过修改后的标准纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。证据的确定性通过建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)框架进行评估。进行了元回归以研究影响总体性功能的变量。此外,还进行了序列分析,以确定荟萃分析所需的信息量:结果:系统性搜索过程共获得了 370 项研究。最终分析包括六项研究。与对照组妇女相比,确诊为 GDM 的孕妇性功能较低。鉴于证据的确定性较低,有必要进行样本量更大的进一步研究,以增强证据的稳健性。医疗保健提供者应关注 GDM 妇女的性健康,并针对她们的特殊需求制定有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on women's sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication with well-established adverse effects on maternal and fetal health. However, research on its impact on sexual health is inconsistent. Currently, there is no comprehensive review on sexual function in pregnant women with GDM. The purpose of this study is to systematically gather and synthesize the available evidence, addressing this important research gap.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis utilized a comprehensive literature search strategy and incorporated the following databases: the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, SID, and Google Scholar. The search was conducted until February 21, 2024. The quality of the cross-sectional and case‒control studies included in the current study was evaluated via the modified and standard Newcastle‒Ottawa scale. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. A meta-regression was conducted to examine the variables that influence total sexual function. Additionally, sequential analysis was performed to determine the required information size for the meta-analysis.

Results: The systematic search process yielded a total of 370 studies. The final analysis included six studies. The meta-analysis findings revealed that compared with controls, women with GDM had significantly lower total scores for sexual function (SMD - 1.80, 95% CI -3.44 to -0.15, p = 0.03), sexual desire (SMD - 5.14, 95% CI -8.14 to -2.14, p < 0.001), arousal (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.21, p = 0.002), lubrication (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.22, p < 0.001) and satisfaction (SMD - 3.82, 95% CI -6.08 to -1.57, p < 0.001). However, the analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences in sexual pain, or orgasm between the GDM and control groups. The meta-regression analysis revealed that older age in the control group was associated with poorer sexual function.

Conclusion: Compared with control women, pregnant women diagnosed with GDM have lower sexual function. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary to enhance the robustness of the evidence, given the low level of certainty. Healthcare providers should focus on the sexual well-being of women with GDM and create tailored interventions to address their specific needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信