我们倾听、支持并相互依赖":关于领导力如何影响实施质量改进干预措施的定性研究。

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Liane Ginsburg, Adam Easterbrook, Ariane Geerts, Whitney Berta, Lynda van Dreumel, Carole A Estabrooks, Peter G Norton, Adrian Wagg
{"title":"我们倾听、支持并相互依赖\":关于领导力如何影响实施质量改进干预措施的定性研究。","authors":"Liane Ginsburg, Adam Easterbrook, Ariane Geerts, Whitney Berta, Lynda van Dreumel, Carole A Estabrooks, Peter G Norton, Adrian Wagg","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing recognition in the literature of the 'Herculean' efforts required to bring about change in healthcare processes and systems. Leadership is recognised as a critical lever for implementation of quality improvement (QI) and other complex team-level interventions; however, the processes by which leaders facilitate change are not well understood. The aim of this study is to examine 'how' leadership influences implementation of QI interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We drew on the leadership literature and used secondary data collected as part of a process evaluation of the Safer Care for Older Persons in residential Environments (SCOPE) QI intervention to gain insights regarding the processes by which leadership influences QI implementation. Specifically, using detailed process evaluation data from 31 unit-based nursing home teams we conducted a thematic analysis with a codebook developed a priori based on the existing literature to identify leadership processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effective leaders (ie, those who care teams felt supported by and who facilitated SCOPE implementation) successfully developed and reaffirmed teams' commitment to the SCOPE QI intervention (theme 1), facilitated learning capacity by fostering follower participation in SCOPE and empowering care aides to step into team leadership roles (theme 2) and actively supported team-oriented processes where they developed and nurtured relationships with their followers and supported them as they navigated relationships with other staff (theme 3). Together, these were the mechanisms by which care aides were brought on board with the intervention, stayed on board and, ultimately, transplanted the intervention into the facility. Building learning capacity and creating a culture of improvement are thought to be the overarching processes by which leadership facilitates implementation of complex interventions like SCOPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results highlight important, often overlooked, relational and sociocultural aspects of successful QI leadership in nursing homes that can guide the design, implementation and scaling of complex interventions and can guide future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'We listened and supported and depended on each other': a qualitative study of how leadership influences implementation of QI interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Liane Ginsburg, Adam Easterbrook, Ariane Geerts, Whitney Berta, Lynda van Dreumel, Carole A Estabrooks, Peter G Norton, Adrian Wagg\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing recognition in the literature of the 'Herculean' efforts required to bring about change in healthcare processes and systems. Leadership is recognised as a critical lever for implementation of quality improvement (QI) and other complex team-level interventions; however, the processes by which leaders facilitate change are not well understood. The aim of this study is to examine 'how' leadership influences implementation of QI interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We drew on the leadership literature and used secondary data collected as part of a process evaluation of the Safer Care for Older Persons in residential Environments (SCOPE) QI intervention to gain insights regarding the processes by which leadership influences QI implementation. Specifically, using detailed process evaluation data from 31 unit-based nursing home teams we conducted a thematic analysis with a codebook developed a priori based on the existing literature to identify leadership processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effective leaders (ie, those who care teams felt supported by and who facilitated SCOPE implementation) successfully developed and reaffirmed teams' commitment to the SCOPE QI intervention (theme 1), facilitated learning capacity by fostering follower participation in SCOPE and empowering care aides to step into team leadership roles (theme 2) and actively supported team-oriented processes where they developed and nurtured relationships with their followers and supported them as they navigated relationships with other staff (theme 3). Together, these were the mechanisms by which care aides were brought on board with the intervention, stayed on board and, ultimately, transplanted the intervention into the facility. Building learning capacity and creating a culture of improvement are thought to be the overarching processes by which leadership facilitates implementation of complex interventions like SCOPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results highlight important, often overlooked, relational and sociocultural aspects of successful QI leadership in nursing homes that can guide the design, implementation and scaling of complex interventions and can guide future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017795\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017795","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的文献认识到,要改变医疗保健流程和系统,需要付出 "艰巨 "的努力。领导力被认为是实施质量改进(QI)和其他复杂的团队层面干预措施的关键杠杆;然而,人们对领导力促进变革的过程却不甚了解。本研究旨在探讨领导力 "如何 "影响质量改进干预措施的实施:我们借鉴了领导力方面的文献,并使用了作为 "为居住环境中的老年人提供更安全的护理"(SCOPE)QI 干预过程评估的一部分而收集的二手数据,以深入了解领导力影响 QI 实施的过程。具体来说,我们利用来自 31 个以单位为基础的养老院团队的详细过程评估数据进行了主题分析,并根据现有文献事先编制了编码手册,以确定领导力过程:有效的领导者(即那些让护理团队感到得到支持并促进了 SCOPE 实施的领导者)成功地发展并重申了团队对 SCOPE QI 干预的承诺(主题 1),通过促进追随者参与 SCOPE 和授权护理助理进入团队领导角色来促进学习能力(主题 2),并积极支持以团队为导向的流程,在这些流程中,他们发展并培养了与追随者的关系,并在他们处理与其他员工的关系时为他们提供了支持(主题 3)。通过这些机制,护理辅助人员参与到干预措施中来,并坚持下去,最终将干预措施移植到设施中。建立学习能力和创造改进文化被认为是领导层促进实施 SCOPE 等复杂干预措施的主要过程:结论:研究结果强调了在养老院成功实施质量改进领导力的重要但往往被忽视的关系和社会文化方面,这些方面可以指导复杂干预措施的设计、实施和推广,并为未来的研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'We listened and supported and depended on each other': a qualitative study of how leadership influences implementation of QI interventions.

Background: There is growing recognition in the literature of the 'Herculean' efforts required to bring about change in healthcare processes and systems. Leadership is recognised as a critical lever for implementation of quality improvement (QI) and other complex team-level interventions; however, the processes by which leaders facilitate change are not well understood. The aim of this study is to examine 'how' leadership influences implementation of QI interventions.

Methods: We drew on the leadership literature and used secondary data collected as part of a process evaluation of the Safer Care for Older Persons in residential Environments (SCOPE) QI intervention to gain insights regarding the processes by which leadership influences QI implementation. Specifically, using detailed process evaluation data from 31 unit-based nursing home teams we conducted a thematic analysis with a codebook developed a priori based on the existing literature to identify leadership processes.

Results: Effective leaders (ie, those who care teams felt supported by and who facilitated SCOPE implementation) successfully developed and reaffirmed teams' commitment to the SCOPE QI intervention (theme 1), facilitated learning capacity by fostering follower participation in SCOPE and empowering care aides to step into team leadership roles (theme 2) and actively supported team-oriented processes where they developed and nurtured relationships with their followers and supported them as they navigated relationships with other staff (theme 3). Together, these were the mechanisms by which care aides were brought on board with the intervention, stayed on board and, ultimately, transplanted the intervention into the facility. Building learning capacity and creating a culture of improvement are thought to be the overarching processes by which leadership facilitates implementation of complex interventions like SCOPE.

Conclusions: Results highlight important, often overlooked, relational and sociocultural aspects of successful QI leadership in nursing homes that can guide the design, implementation and scaling of complex interventions and can guide future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信