间质性肺病患者静息和运动时的通气模型:一项实验研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Elise Artaud-Macari, Emeline Fresnel, Adrien Kerfourn, Clémence Roussel, David Debeaumont, Marie-Anne Melone, Francis-Edouard Gravier, Tristan Bonnevie, Mathieu Salaün, Antoine Cuvelier, Christophe Girault
{"title":"间质性肺病患者静息和运动时的通气模型:一项实验研究。","authors":"Elise Artaud-Macari, Emeline Fresnel, Adrien Kerfourn, Clémence Roussel, David Debeaumont, Marie-Anne Melone, Francis-Edouard Gravier, Tristan Bonnevie, Mathieu Salaün, Antoine Cuvelier, Christophe Girault","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03383-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ventilatory physiopathology of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood. We aimed to personalize a mechanical simulator to model healthy and ILD profiles ventilation, and to evaluate the effect of spontaneous breathing on respiratory mechanics at rest and during exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 2-compartment lung simulator (ASL 5000<sup>®</sup>), we modeled 1 healthy and 3 ILD profiles, at rest and during exercise, based on physiological data from literature and patients. Measurements were: tidal volume, end-expiratory lung volume, driving pressure, transpulmonary driving pressure, dynamic alveolar strain, mechanical power, and time lag of inspiratory flow between compartments 1 and 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthy and ILD models were validated: maximum differences between real and simulated tidal volume were 5% (96 ml) and 6% (54 ml) at rest and during exercise respectively, considered clinically negligible. When we simulated lung inhomogeneity (compliance in compartment 1 > compartment 2), tidal volume, end-expiratory lung volume, driving pressure and mechanical power increased in compartment 1 and decreased in compartment 2. Driving transpulmonary pressure and dynamic alveolar strain increased in compartment 2 and decreased in compartment 1. Time lag of inspiratory flow between compartments 1 and 2 was positively correlated with a difference of compliance between compartments (r = 0.98, CI95% (0.9106; 0.9962), p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this bench study, we personalized a mechanical simulator thatmodels the lung inhomogeneity and spontaneous breathing of healthy subjects and ILD patients at rest and during exercise. Our results suggest that lung inhomogeneity could increase lung vulnerability to volo-atelec-trauma mechanisms in ILD. Further physiological studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this vulnerability on acute or chronic ILD worsening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling ventilation of patients with interstitial lung disease at rest and exercise: a bench study.\",\"authors\":\"Elise Artaud-Macari, Emeline Fresnel, Adrien Kerfourn, Clémence Roussel, David Debeaumont, Marie-Anne Melone, Francis-Edouard Gravier, Tristan Bonnevie, Mathieu Salaün, Antoine Cuvelier, Christophe Girault\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-024-03383-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ventilatory physiopathology of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood. We aimed to personalize a mechanical simulator to model healthy and ILD profiles ventilation, and to evaluate the effect of spontaneous breathing on respiratory mechanics at rest and during exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 2-compartment lung simulator (ASL 5000<sup>®</sup>), we modeled 1 healthy and 3 ILD profiles, at rest and during exercise, based on physiological data from literature and patients. Measurements were: tidal volume, end-expiratory lung volume, driving pressure, transpulmonary driving pressure, dynamic alveolar strain, mechanical power, and time lag of inspiratory flow between compartments 1 and 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthy and ILD models were validated: maximum differences between real and simulated tidal volume were 5% (96 ml) and 6% (54 ml) at rest and during exercise respectively, considered clinically negligible. When we simulated lung inhomogeneity (compliance in compartment 1 > compartment 2), tidal volume, end-expiratory lung volume, driving pressure and mechanical power increased in compartment 1 and decreased in compartment 2. Driving transpulmonary pressure and dynamic alveolar strain increased in compartment 2 and decreased in compartment 1. Time lag of inspiratory flow between compartments 1 and 2 was positively correlated with a difference of compliance between compartments (r = 0.98, CI95% (0.9106; 0.9962), p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this bench study, we personalized a mechanical simulator thatmodels the lung inhomogeneity and spontaneous breathing of healthy subjects and ILD patients at rest and during exercise. Our results suggest that lung inhomogeneity could increase lung vulnerability to volo-atelec-trauma mechanisms in ILD. Further physiological studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this vulnerability on acute or chronic ILD worsening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03383-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03383-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们对间质性肺病(ILD)患者的通气生理病理仍然知之甚少。我们的目的是对机械模拟器进行个性化设计,以模拟健康和 ILD 通气曲线,并评估自主呼吸对静息和运动时呼吸力学的影响:根据文献和患者提供的生理数据,我们在双腔肺模拟器(ASL 5000®)上模拟了 1 种健康和 3 种 ILD 特征,包括静息时和运动时。测量项目包括:潮气量、呼气末肺活量、驱动压力、跨肺驱动压力、肺泡动态应变、机械功率以及 1 号隔室和 2 号隔室之间吸气流量的时滞:健康模型和 ILD 模型均通过验证:实际潮气量与模拟潮气量在静息时和运动时的最大差异分别为 5%(96 毫升)和 6%(54 毫升),在临床上可以忽略不计。当我们模拟肺部不均匀性(1 区顺应性大于 2 区顺应性)时,1 区的潮气量、呼气末肺活量、驱动压力和机械动力增加,而 2 区的潮气量、呼气末肺活量、驱动压力和机械动力减少。驱动跨肺压和肺泡动态应变在 2 区增加,在 1 区减少。1 号室和 2 号室之间吸气流量的时滞与各室顺应性的差异呈正相关(r = 0.98,CI95% (0.9106; 0.9962),p 结论:在这项工作台研究中,我们对机械模拟器进行了个性化设计,模拟了健康受试者和 ILD 患者在休息和运动时的肺部不均匀性和自发呼吸。我们的研究结果表明,肺不均匀性可能会增加 ILD 患者肺部易受体积-耳廓-创伤机制影响的程度。要评估这种脆弱性对急性或慢性 ILD 恶化的影响,还需要进一步的生理学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling ventilation of patients with interstitial lung disease at rest and exercise: a bench study.

Background: The ventilatory physiopathology of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood. We aimed to personalize a mechanical simulator to model healthy and ILD profiles ventilation, and to evaluate the effect of spontaneous breathing on respiratory mechanics at rest and during exercise.

Methods: In a 2-compartment lung simulator (ASL 5000®), we modeled 1 healthy and 3 ILD profiles, at rest and during exercise, based on physiological data from literature and patients. Measurements were: tidal volume, end-expiratory lung volume, driving pressure, transpulmonary driving pressure, dynamic alveolar strain, mechanical power, and time lag of inspiratory flow between compartments 1 and 2.

Results: Healthy and ILD models were validated: maximum differences between real and simulated tidal volume were 5% (96 ml) and 6% (54 ml) at rest and during exercise respectively, considered clinically negligible. When we simulated lung inhomogeneity (compliance in compartment 1 > compartment 2), tidal volume, end-expiratory lung volume, driving pressure and mechanical power increased in compartment 1 and decreased in compartment 2. Driving transpulmonary pressure and dynamic alveolar strain increased in compartment 2 and decreased in compartment 1. Time lag of inspiratory flow between compartments 1 and 2 was positively correlated with a difference of compliance between compartments (r = 0.98, CI95% (0.9106; 0.9962), p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: In this bench study, we personalized a mechanical simulator thatmodels the lung inhomogeneity and spontaneous breathing of healthy subjects and ILD patients at rest and during exercise. Our results suggest that lung inhomogeneity could increase lung vulnerability to volo-atelec-trauma mechanisms in ILD. Further physiological studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this vulnerability on acute or chronic ILD worsening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信