妊娠体重增加的预测模型:机器学习多类分类研究。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Audêncio Victor, Hellen Geremias Dos Santos, Gabriel Ferreira Santos Silva, Fabiano Barcellos Filho, Alexandre de Fátima Cobre, Liania A Luzia, Patrícia H C Rondó, Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho
{"title":"妊娠体重增加的预测模型:机器学习多类分类研究。","authors":"Audêncio Victor, Hellen Geremias Dos Santos, Gabriel Ferreira Santos Silva, Fabiano Barcellos Filho, Alexandre de Fátima Cobre, Liania A Luzia, Patrícia H C Rondó, Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06952-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational weight gain (GWG) is a critical factor influencing maternal and fetal health. Excessive or insufficient GWG can lead to various complications, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, cesarean delivery, low birth weight, and preterm birth. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict GWG categories: below, within, or above recommended guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the Araraquara Cohort, Brazil, which comprised 1557 pregnant women with a gestational age of 19 weeks or less. Predictors included socioeconomic, demographic, lifestyle, morbidity, and anthropometric factors. Five machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, LightGBM, AdaBoost, CatBoost, and XGBoost) were employed for model development. The models were trained and evaluated using a multiclass classification approach. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), F1 score and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The outcomes were categorized as follows: GWG within recommendations (28.7%), GWG below (32.5%), and GWG above recommendations (38.7%). The XGBoost presented the best overall model, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for GWG within, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.65 for GWG above. The LightGBM also performed well with an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for predicting GWG within recommendations, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.624 for GWG above. The most important predictors of GWG were pre-gestational BMI, maternal age, glycemic profile, hemoglobin levels, and arm circumference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models can effectively predict GWG categories, offering a valuable tool for early identification of at-risk pregnancies. This approach can enhance personalized prenatal care and interventions to promote optimal pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive modeling of gestational weight gain: a machine learning multiclass classification study.\",\"authors\":\"Audêncio Victor, Hellen Geremias Dos Santos, Gabriel Ferreira Santos Silva, Fabiano Barcellos Filho, Alexandre de Fátima Cobre, Liania A Luzia, Patrícia H C Rondó, Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-024-06952-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational weight gain (GWG) is a critical factor influencing maternal and fetal health. Excessive or insufficient GWG can lead to various complications, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, cesarean delivery, low birth weight, and preterm birth. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict GWG categories: below, within, or above recommended guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the Araraquara Cohort, Brazil, which comprised 1557 pregnant women with a gestational age of 19 weeks or less. Predictors included socioeconomic, demographic, lifestyle, morbidity, and anthropometric factors. Five machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, LightGBM, AdaBoost, CatBoost, and XGBoost) were employed for model development. The models were trained and evaluated using a multiclass classification approach. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), F1 score and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The outcomes were categorized as follows: GWG within recommendations (28.7%), GWG below (32.5%), and GWG above recommendations (38.7%). The XGBoost presented the best overall model, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for GWG within, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.65 for GWG above. The LightGBM also performed well with an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for predicting GWG within recommendations, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.624 for GWG above. The most important predictors of GWG were pre-gestational BMI, maternal age, glycemic profile, hemoglobin levels, and arm circumference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models can effectively predict GWG categories, offering a valuable tool for early identification of at-risk pregnancies. This approach can enhance personalized prenatal care and interventions to promote optimal pregnancy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549867/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06952-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06952-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠体重增加(GWG)是影响孕产妇和胎儿健康的关键因素。GWG过高或过低会导致各种并发症,包括妊娠糖尿病、高血压、剖宫产、低出生体重和早产。本研究旨在开发和评估机器学习模型,以预测 GWG 类别:低于、符合或高于推荐指南:我们分析了巴西阿拉瓜拉队列(Araraquara Cohort)的数据,该队列由 1557 名孕龄在 19 周或以下的孕妇组成。预测因素包括社会经济、人口、生活方式、发病率和人体测量因素。模型开发采用了五种机器学习算法(随机森林、LightGBM、AdaBoost、CatBoost 和 XGBoost)。模型采用多类分类方法进行训练和评估。使用 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)、F1 分数和马修相关系数(MCC)等指标对模型性能进行评估:结果分类如下GWG 在建议范围内(28.7%),GWG 低于建议范围(32.5%),GWG 高于建议范围(38.7%)。XGBoost 是整体效果最好的模型,GWG 在建议范围内的 AUC-ROC 为 0.79,GWG 低于建议范围的 AUC-ROC 为 0.76,GWG 高于建议范围的 AUC-ROC 为 0.65。LightGBM 也表现出色,预测建议内 GWG 的 AUC-ROC 为 0.79,预测建议以下 GWG 的 AUC-ROC 为 0.76,预测建议以上 GWG 的 AUC-ROC 为 0.624。预测 GWG 的最重要因素是孕前体重指数、孕产妇年龄、血糖状况、血红蛋白水平和臂围:机器学习模型可有效预测 GWG 类别,为早期识别高危妊娠提供了有价值的工具。这种方法可加强个性化产前护理和干预,以促进最佳妊娠结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive modeling of gestational weight gain: a machine learning multiclass classification study.

Background: Gestational weight gain (GWG) is a critical factor influencing maternal and fetal health. Excessive or insufficient GWG can lead to various complications, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, cesarean delivery, low birth weight, and preterm birth. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict GWG categories: below, within, or above recommended guidelines.

Methods: We analyzed data from the Araraquara Cohort, Brazil, which comprised 1557 pregnant women with a gestational age of 19 weeks or less. Predictors included socioeconomic, demographic, lifestyle, morbidity, and anthropometric factors. Five machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, LightGBM, AdaBoost, CatBoost, and XGBoost) were employed for model development. The models were trained and evaluated using a multiclass classification approach. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), F1 score and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC).

Results: The outcomes were categorized as follows: GWG within recommendations (28.7%), GWG below (32.5%), and GWG above recommendations (38.7%). The XGBoost presented the best overall model, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for GWG within, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.65 for GWG above. The LightGBM also performed well with an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for predicting GWG within recommendations, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.624 for GWG above. The most important predictors of GWG were pre-gestational BMI, maternal age, glycemic profile, hemoglobin levels, and arm circumference.

Conclusion: Machine learning models can effectively predict GWG categories, offering a valuable tool for early identification of at-risk pregnancies. This approach can enhance personalized prenatal care and interventions to promote optimal pregnancy outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信