晶体液联合输注率对预防性苯肾上腺素剂量需求的影响,以防止剖宫产脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉后出现低血压。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Xiao-Min Zhang, Jing Qian, Lin Liu, Yue-Ping Shen, Fei Xiao
{"title":"晶体液联合输注率对预防性苯肾上腺素剂量需求的影响,以防止剖宫产脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉后出现低血压。","authors":"Xiao-Min Zhang, Jing Qian, Lin Liu, Yue-Ping Shen, Fei Xiao","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06937-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous fluid administration and prophylactic vasopressor infusion are the primary methods for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. However, evidence regarding the impact of different volumes of crystalloid solution on the phenylephrine infusion dosage for preventing this hypotension remains inconclusive. This study aimed to determine the effect of two IV fluid infusion rates (10 or 20 mL/kg/h) on phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mL/kg/h (group 10) or 20 mL/kg/h (group 20) of lactated Ringer's solution. The first patient in each group received 0.5 µg/kg/min of phenylephrine infusion immediately after intrathecal injection. The phenylephrine dose in subsequent patients was adjusted by increments or decrements of 0.05 µg/kg/min based on the previous patient's response. The ED50 of phenylephrine infusion for preventing spinal-induced hypotension for cesarean delivery was estimated using a modified up-down sequential analysis, with probit analysis applied as a backup sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ED50 values for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.30 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.29-0.32 µg/kg/min) for group 10, and 0.19 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.16-0.22 µg/kg/min) for group 20, respectively. The estimated relative potency for phenylephrine in group 10 compared to group 20 was 1.52 (95%CI, 1.24-1.97), showing a significant difference in the ED50 values between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that a higher crystalloid co-loading rate significantly reduces prophylactic phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia induced hypotension.</p><p><strong>Trials registration: </strong>https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=125918 (Trial number: ChiCTR2100048002).</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of crystalloid solution co-loading infusion rate on the dose requirements of prophylactic phenylephrine for preventing hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Min Zhang, Jing Qian, Lin Liu, Yue-Ping Shen, Fei Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-024-06937-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous fluid administration and prophylactic vasopressor infusion are the primary methods for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. However, evidence regarding the impact of different volumes of crystalloid solution on the phenylephrine infusion dosage for preventing this hypotension remains inconclusive. This study aimed to determine the effect of two IV fluid infusion rates (10 or 20 mL/kg/h) on phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mL/kg/h (group 10) or 20 mL/kg/h (group 20) of lactated Ringer's solution. The first patient in each group received 0.5 µg/kg/min of phenylephrine infusion immediately after intrathecal injection. The phenylephrine dose in subsequent patients was adjusted by increments or decrements of 0.05 µg/kg/min based on the previous patient's response. The ED50 of phenylephrine infusion for preventing spinal-induced hypotension for cesarean delivery was estimated using a modified up-down sequential analysis, with probit analysis applied as a backup sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ED50 values for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.30 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.29-0.32 µg/kg/min) for group 10, and 0.19 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.16-0.22 µg/kg/min) for group 20, respectively. The estimated relative potency for phenylephrine in group 10 compared to group 20 was 1.52 (95%CI, 1.24-1.97), showing a significant difference in the ED50 values between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that a higher crystalloid co-loading rate significantly reduces prophylactic phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia induced hypotension.</p><p><strong>Trials registration: </strong>https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=125918 (Trial number: ChiCTR2100048002).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06937-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06937-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:静脉输液和预防性输注血管加压素是预防剖宫产过程中脊髓麻醉诱发低血压的主要方法。然而,不同容量的晶体液对预防低血压的苯肾上腺素输注剂量的影响仍无定论。本研究旨在确定两种静脉输液速度(10 或 20 mL/kg/h)对预防脊髓麻醉引起的低血压的苯肾上腺素需求量的影响:方法:80 名健康产妇在脊柱-硬膜外联合麻醉下接受择期剖宫产。参与者被随机分配接受 10 mL/kg/h(第 10 组)或 20 mL/kg/h(第 20 组)的乳酸林格氏液。每组的第一名患者在鞘内注射后立即接受 0.5 µg/kg/min 的苯肾上腺素输注。其后患者的苯肾上腺素剂量根据前一位患者的反应以 0.05 µg/kg/min 为单位递增或递减。采用改良的上下顺序分析法估算了输注苯肾上腺素预防剖宫产脊柱诱发低血压的 ED50 值,并应用 probit 分析作为后备敏感性分析:第10组和第20组预防脊髓麻醉诱发低血压的ED50值分别为0.30微克/千克/分钟(95% CI,0.29-0.32微克/千克/分钟)和0.19微克/千克/分钟(95% CI,0.16-0.22微克/千克/分钟)。第 10 组与第 20 组相比,苯肾上腺素的估计相对效力为 1.52(95%CI,1.24-1.97),两组的 ED50 值差异显著:本研究发现,较高的晶体液联合负荷率可显著降低预防性苯肾上腺素的需求量,从而预防脊髓麻醉诱发的低血压。试验注册:https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=125918(试验编号:ChiCTR2100048002)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of crystalloid solution co-loading infusion rate on the dose requirements of prophylactic phenylephrine for preventing hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Background: Intravenous fluid administration and prophylactic vasopressor infusion are the primary methods for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. However, evidence regarding the impact of different volumes of crystalloid solution on the phenylephrine infusion dosage for preventing this hypotension remains inconclusive. This study aimed to determine the effect of two IV fluid infusion rates (10 or 20 mL/kg/h) on phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension.

Methods: Eighty healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mL/kg/h (group 10) or 20 mL/kg/h (group 20) of lactated Ringer's solution. The first patient in each group received 0.5 µg/kg/min of phenylephrine infusion immediately after intrathecal injection. The phenylephrine dose in subsequent patients was adjusted by increments or decrements of 0.05 µg/kg/min based on the previous patient's response. The ED50 of phenylephrine infusion for preventing spinal-induced hypotension for cesarean delivery was estimated using a modified up-down sequential analysis, with probit analysis applied as a backup sensitivity analysis.

Results: The ED50 values for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.30 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.29-0.32 µg/kg/min) for group 10, and 0.19 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.16-0.22 µg/kg/min) for group 20, respectively. The estimated relative potency for phenylephrine in group 10 compared to group 20 was 1.52 (95%CI, 1.24-1.97), showing a significant difference in the ED50 values between the two groups.

Conclusion: This study found that a higher crystalloid co-loading rate significantly reduces prophylactic phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia induced hypotension.

Trials registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=125918 (Trial number: ChiCTR2100048002).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信