Zahra S Ghoreyshi, Hamid Teimouri, Anatoly B Kolomeisky, Jason T George
{"title":"将动力学数据整合到基于亲和力的模型中,改进 T 细胞特异性预测。","authors":"Zahra S Ghoreyshi, Hamid Teimouri, Anatoly B Kolomeisky, Jason T George","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>T cell receptor (TCR) and peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interactions that result in T cell activation are complex and have been distinguished by their equilibrium affinity and kinetic profiles. While prior affinity-based models can successfully predict meaningful TCR-pMHC interactions in many cases, they occasionally fail at identifying TCR-pMHC interactions with low binding affinity. This study analyzes TCR-pMHC systems for which empirical kinetic and affinity data exist and prior affinity-based predictions have failed. We identify criteria for TCR-pMHC systems with available kinetic information where the introduction of a correction factor improves energy-based model predictions. This kinetic correction factor offers a means to refine existing models with additional data and offers molecular insights to help reconcile previously conflicting reports concerning the influence of TCR-pMHC binding kinetics and affinity on T cell activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":"4115-4122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of kinetic data into affinity-based models for improved T cell specificity prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra S Ghoreyshi, Hamid Teimouri, Anatoly B Kolomeisky, Jason T George\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>T cell receptor (TCR) and peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interactions that result in T cell activation are complex and have been distinguished by their equilibrium affinity and kinetic profiles. While prior affinity-based models can successfully predict meaningful TCR-pMHC interactions in many cases, they occasionally fail at identifying TCR-pMHC interactions with low binding affinity. This study analyzes TCR-pMHC systems for which empirical kinetic and affinity data exist and prior affinity-based predictions have failed. We identify criteria for TCR-pMHC systems with available kinetic information where the introduction of a correction factor improves energy-based model predictions. This kinetic correction factor offers a means to refine existing models with additional data and offers molecular insights to help reconcile previously conflicting reports concerning the influence of TCR-pMHC binding kinetics and affinity on T cell activation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4115-4122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导致 T 细胞活化的 T 细胞受体(TCR)和肽-主要组织相容性复合体(pMHC)相互作用非常复杂,并根据其平衡亲和力和动力学特征加以区分。虽然之前基于亲和力的模型在很多情况下能成功预测有意义的 TCR-pMHC 相互作用,但它们偶尔也会在识别低结合亲和力的 TCR-pMHC 相互作用时失败。本研究分析了存在经验动力学和亲和力数据而先前基于亲和力的预测失败的 TCR-pMHC 系统。我们确定了具有可用动力学信息的 TCR-pMHC 系统的标准,在这些系统中引入校正因子可改善基于能量的模型预测。该动力学校正因子提供了一种利用更多数据完善现有模型的方法,并提供了分子见解,有助于调和以前关于 TCR-pMHC 结合动力学和亲和力对 T 细胞活化影响的相互矛盾的报道。
Integration of kinetic data into affinity-based models for improved T cell specificity prediction.
T cell receptor (TCR) and peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interactions that result in T cell activation are complex and have been distinguished by their equilibrium affinity and kinetic profiles. While prior affinity-based models can successfully predict meaningful TCR-pMHC interactions in many cases, they occasionally fail at identifying TCR-pMHC interactions with low binding affinity. This study analyzes TCR-pMHC systems for which empirical kinetic and affinity data exist and prior affinity-based predictions have failed. We identify criteria for TCR-pMHC systems with available kinetic information where the introduction of a correction factor improves energy-based model predictions. This kinetic correction factor offers a means to refine existing models with additional data and offers molecular insights to help reconcile previously conflicting reports concerning the influence of TCR-pMHC binding kinetics and affinity on T cell activation.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.