基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 对中国 beta 受体阻滞剂使用趋势和安全性进行的真实世界研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yilong Yan, Wenshuo An, Shenghui Mei, Qiang Zhu, Cao Li, Li Yang, Zhigang Zhao, Jiping Huo
{"title":"基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 对中国 beta 受体阻滞剂使用趋势和安全性进行的真实世界研究。","authors":"Yilong Yan, Wenshuo An, Shenghui Mei, Qiang Zhu, Cao Li, Li Yang, Zhigang Zhao, Jiping Huo","doi":"10.1186/s40360-024-00815-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beta-blockers are widely used, with continuously updated clinical recommendations. However, their application faces challenges in personalized treatment and safety. The study aimed to investigate the frequency and patterns of prescribing beta-blockers in China and to explore potential adverse event risk signals associated with beta-blockers, providing reference for rational medication use in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prescription data for beta-blockers from January 2018 to June 2023 were extracted through the Hospital Prescription Analysis Collaborative Project in China to analyze clinical usage trends. While adverse drug reaction reports for beta-blockers were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The classification and standardization of adverse drug event (ADE) reports were based on the preferred terms (PT) and corresponding system organ classes (SOC) from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Signal detection utilized a proportion imbalance method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In clinical practice, metoprolol dominated beta-blocker prescriptions in China, accounting for 62.2%. Beta-blockers were primarily prescribed to the elderly (65.7%) and male patients (57.0%). However, off-label use of beta-blockers was relatively widespread. For instance, sotalol was prescribed for hypertension at 18.25%, while esmolol was used for angina and heart failure at rates of 12.94% and 14.98%, respectively. In addition, we identified newly discovered adverse reactions associated with beta-blockers, such as BRASH syndrome (metoprolol: n = 186, ROR = 391.285; carvedilol: n = 72, ROR = 256.459), acute kidney injury (bisoprolol: n = 247, ROR = 5.641), premature baby (labetalol: n = 110, ROR = 91.385), and sleep disorder (propranolol: n = 254, ROR = 10.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Metoprolol led the beta-blocker market in China. Attention was warranted regarding the newly discovered adverse reactions, such as the risk of acute kidney injury with bisoprolol and the potential for BRASH syndrome with metoprolol and carvedilol.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"25 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world research on beta-blocker usage trends in China and safety exploration based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).\",\"authors\":\"Yilong Yan, Wenshuo An, Shenghui Mei, Qiang Zhu, Cao Li, Li Yang, Zhigang Zhao, Jiping Huo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40360-024-00815-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beta-blockers are widely used, with continuously updated clinical recommendations. However, their application faces challenges in personalized treatment and safety. The study aimed to investigate the frequency and patterns of prescribing beta-blockers in China and to explore potential adverse event risk signals associated with beta-blockers, providing reference for rational medication use in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prescription data for beta-blockers from January 2018 to June 2023 were extracted through the Hospital Prescription Analysis Collaborative Project in China to analyze clinical usage trends. While adverse drug reaction reports for beta-blockers were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The classification and standardization of adverse drug event (ADE) reports were based on the preferred terms (PT) and corresponding system organ classes (SOC) from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Signal detection utilized a proportion imbalance method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In clinical practice, metoprolol dominated beta-blocker prescriptions in China, accounting for 62.2%. Beta-blockers were primarily prescribed to the elderly (65.7%) and male patients (57.0%). However, off-label use of beta-blockers was relatively widespread. For instance, sotalol was prescribed for hypertension at 18.25%, while esmolol was used for angina and heart failure at rates of 12.94% and 14.98%, respectively. In addition, we identified newly discovered adverse reactions associated with beta-blockers, such as BRASH syndrome (metoprolol: n = 186, ROR = 391.285; carvedilol: n = 72, ROR = 256.459), acute kidney injury (bisoprolol: n = 247, ROR = 5.641), premature baby (labetalol: n = 110, ROR = 91.385), and sleep disorder (propranolol: n = 254, ROR = 10.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Metoprolol led the beta-blocker market in China. Attention was warranted regarding the newly discovered adverse reactions, such as the risk of acute kidney injury with bisoprolol and the potential for BRASH syndrome with metoprolol and carvedilol.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00815-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00815-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:β-受体阻滞剂被广泛使用,临床建议也在不断更新。然而,其应用在个性化治疗和安全性方面面临挑战。本研究旨在调查中国β受体阻滞剂的处方频率和模式,探讨与β受体阻滞剂相关的潜在不良事件风险信号,为临床合理用药提供参考:通过中国医院处方分析协作项目提取2018年1月至2023年6月的β-受体阻滞剂处方数据,分析临床用药趋势。而β-受体阻滞剂的药品不良反应报告则来自美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库。药物不良反应(ADE)报告的分类和标准化基于《监管活动医学词典》(MedDRA)中的首选术语(PT)和相应的系统器官类别(SOC)。信号检测采用比例失衡法:在临床实践中,美托洛尔占中国β-受体阻滞剂处方的主导地位,占62.2%。β-受体阻滞剂主要用于老年人(65.7%)和男性患者(57.0%)。然而,标签外使用β-受体阻滞剂的情况相对普遍。例如,索他洛尔用于高血压的比例为 18.25%,而艾司洛尔用于心绞痛和心力衰竭的比例分别为 12.94% 和 14.98%。此外,我们还发现了新发现的与β-受体阻滞剂相关的不良反应,如BRASH综合征(美托洛尔:n = 186,ROR = 391.285;卡维地洛:n = 72,ROR = 256.459)、急性肾损伤(比索洛尔:n = 247,ROR = 5.641)、早产儿(拉贝洛尔:n = 110,ROR = 91.385)和睡眠障碍(普萘洛尔:n = 254,ROR = 10.98):结论:美托洛尔引领了中国的β-受体阻滞剂市场。新发现的不良反应值得关注,如比索洛尔有急性肾损伤的风险,美托洛尔和卡维地洛可能导致 BRASH 综合征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world research on beta-blocker usage trends in China and safety exploration based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Background: Beta-blockers are widely used, with continuously updated clinical recommendations. However, their application faces challenges in personalized treatment and safety. The study aimed to investigate the frequency and patterns of prescribing beta-blockers in China and to explore potential adverse event risk signals associated with beta-blockers, providing reference for rational medication use in clinical settings.

Methods: Prescription data for beta-blockers from January 2018 to June 2023 were extracted through the Hospital Prescription Analysis Collaborative Project in China to analyze clinical usage trends. While adverse drug reaction reports for beta-blockers were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The classification and standardization of adverse drug event (ADE) reports were based on the preferred terms (PT) and corresponding system organ classes (SOC) from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Signal detection utilized a proportion imbalance method.

Results: In clinical practice, metoprolol dominated beta-blocker prescriptions in China, accounting for 62.2%. Beta-blockers were primarily prescribed to the elderly (65.7%) and male patients (57.0%). However, off-label use of beta-blockers was relatively widespread. For instance, sotalol was prescribed for hypertension at 18.25%, while esmolol was used for angina and heart failure at rates of 12.94% and 14.98%, respectively. In addition, we identified newly discovered adverse reactions associated with beta-blockers, such as BRASH syndrome (metoprolol: n = 186, ROR = 391.285; carvedilol: n = 72, ROR = 256.459), acute kidney injury (bisoprolol: n = 247, ROR = 5.641), premature baby (labetalol: n = 110, ROR = 91.385), and sleep disorder (propranolol: n = 254, ROR = 10.98).

Conclusions: Metoprolol led the beta-blocker market in China. Attention was warranted regarding the newly discovered adverse reactions, such as the risk of acute kidney injury with bisoprolol and the potential for BRASH syndrome with metoprolol and carvedilol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信