Lauren K King, Ian Stanaitis, Vivian Hung, Sahil Koppikar, Esther J Waugh, Lorraine Lipscombe, Gillian A Hawker
{"title":"国家健康与护理卓越研究所诊断膝骨关节炎的临床标准:2型糖尿病患者前瞻性诊断准确性研究》。","authors":"Lauren K King, Ian Stanaitis, Vivian Hung, Sahil Koppikar, Esther J Waugh, Lorraine Lipscombe, Gillian A Hawker","doi":"10.1002/acr.25464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria for osteoarthritis (OA) obviate the need for physical exam or imaging, and their use may improve timely diagnosis of OA. However, they have not been validated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within a larger study of individuals with type 2 diabetes, participants with and without self-reported knee pain underwent assessment of the NICE criteria for knee OA by questionnaire (index test), and clinical evaluation for established or possible knee OA by a rheumatologist (reference standard). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio positive (LR+) and likelihood ratio negative (LR-) of the NICE criteria and modified NICE criteria without the stiffness criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 96 participants: mean age 65.4 (SD 8.3) years and 52% were women. Individuals who fulfilled NICE criteria for knee OA (55.2%) included a spectrum of pain severity on a 11-point pain numeric rating scale with a median score of 5 (range: 1-9). Rheumatologist assessment identified 56 (58.3%) participants with symptomatic knee OA. The sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- of NICE criteria for symptomatic knee OA were 0.84 (95% CI 0.74, 0.94), 0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.96), 5.6 and 0.19, respectively. For modified NICE criteria, these were 0.89 (95% CI 0.82, 0.97), 0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.96), 5.93 and 0.13.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NICE criteria have high sensitivity and specificity for detecting symptomatic knee OA in a population with type 2 diabetes. We found that a modified version, omitting the stiffness criterion, performed similarly. These criteria should be validated in other settings and populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren K King, Ian Stanaitis, Vivian Hung, Sahil Koppikar, Esther J Waugh, Lorraine Lipscombe, Gillian A Hawker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria for osteoarthritis (OA) obviate the need for physical exam or imaging, and their use may improve timely diagnosis of OA. However, they have not been validated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within a larger study of individuals with type 2 diabetes, participants with and without self-reported knee pain underwent assessment of the NICE criteria for knee OA by questionnaire (index test), and clinical evaluation for established or possible knee OA by a rheumatologist (reference standard). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio positive (LR+) and likelihood ratio negative (LR-) of the NICE criteria and modified NICE criteria without the stiffness criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 96 participants: mean age 65.4 (SD 8.3) years and 52% were women. Individuals who fulfilled NICE criteria for knee OA (55.2%) included a spectrum of pain severity on a 11-point pain numeric rating scale with a median score of 5 (range: 1-9). Rheumatologist assessment identified 56 (58.3%) participants with symptomatic knee OA. The sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- of NICE criteria for symptomatic knee OA were 0.84 (95% CI 0.74, 0.94), 0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.96), 5.6 and 0.19, respectively. For modified NICE criteria, these were 0.89 (95% CI 0.82, 0.97), 0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.96), 5.93 and 0.13.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NICE criteria have high sensitivity and specificity for detecting symptomatic knee OA in a population with type 2 diabetes. We found that a modified version, omitting the stiffness criterion, performed similarly. These criteria should be validated in other settings and populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25464\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:美国国家健康与护理优化研究所(NICE)的骨关节炎(OA)标准无需进行体格检查或影像学检查,使用这些标准可提高对 OA 的及时诊断率。然而,这些标准尚未得到验证:在一项针对 2 型糖尿病患者的大型研究中,有膝关节疼痛和没有自述膝关节疼痛的参与者都接受了 NICE 膝关节 OA 标准的问卷评估(指标测试),并接受了风湿免疫科医生对已确诊或可能确诊的膝关节 OA 的临床评估(参考标准)。我们计算了 NICE 标准和不含僵硬度标准的修改版 NICE 标准的敏感性、特异性、似然比阳性(LR+)和似然比阴性(LR-):我们的研究包括 96 名参与者:平均年龄为 65.4 岁(标准差为 8.3 岁),52% 为女性。符合 NICE 标准的膝关节 OA 患者(55.2%)包括 11 点疼痛数字评分表中的疼痛严重程度,中位数为 5 分(范围:1-9)。风湿免疫科医生的评估确定了 56 人(58.3%)为有症状的膝关节 OA 患者。NICE标准对无症状膝关节OA的敏感性、特异性、LR+和LR-分别为0.84(95% CI 0.74,0.94)、0.85(95% CI 0.74,0.96)、5.6和0.19。修改后的 NICE 标准分别为 0.89(95% CI 0.82,0.97)、0.85(95% CI 0.74,0.96)、5.93 和 0.13:NICE 标准在检测 2 型糖尿病患者的无症状膝关节 OA 方面具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。我们发现,省略了僵硬度标准的修改版也有类似的效果。这些标准应在其他环境和人群中进行验证。
National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.
Objective: The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria for osteoarthritis (OA) obviate the need for physical exam or imaging, and their use may improve timely diagnosis of OA. However, they have not been validated.
Methods: Within a larger study of individuals with type 2 diabetes, participants with and without self-reported knee pain underwent assessment of the NICE criteria for knee OA by questionnaire (index test), and clinical evaluation for established or possible knee OA by a rheumatologist (reference standard). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio positive (LR+) and likelihood ratio negative (LR-) of the NICE criteria and modified NICE criteria without the stiffness criterion.
Results: Our study included 96 participants: mean age 65.4 (SD 8.3) years and 52% were women. Individuals who fulfilled NICE criteria for knee OA (55.2%) included a spectrum of pain severity on a 11-point pain numeric rating scale with a median score of 5 (range: 1-9). Rheumatologist assessment identified 56 (58.3%) participants with symptomatic knee OA. The sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- of NICE criteria for symptomatic knee OA were 0.84 (95% CI 0.74, 0.94), 0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.96), 5.6 and 0.19, respectively. For modified NICE criteria, these were 0.89 (95% CI 0.82, 0.97), 0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.96), 5.93 and 0.13.
Conclusion: The NICE criteria have high sensitivity and specificity for detecting symptomatic knee OA in a population with type 2 diabetes. We found that a modified version, omitting the stiffness criterion, performed similarly. These criteria should be validated in other settings and populations.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.