葡萄糖酸氯己定双重清洗法预防新生儿重症监护室手术患者手术部位感染的有效性和安全性。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jin Ah Kwon, Min Jeng Cho
{"title":"葡萄糖酸氯己定双重清洗法预防新生儿重症监护室手术患者手术部位感染的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Jin Ah Kwon, Min Jeng Cho","doi":"10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Ah Kwon, Min Jeng Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了术前葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)双重清洁对降低新生儿重症监护病房手术患者手术部位感染(SSI)发生率的有效性和安全性:一项回顾性病历审查涉及2013年至2022年期间在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)接受73例手术治疗的56例患者。CHG双重清洁包括以下两个过程。首先,在择期手术前一晚或急诊手术前至少1小时用0.5% CHG进行术前清洁。躯干前部的清洁范围从颈部到耻骨,包括两条腋线。其次,在切口前使用 2% CHG 与 72% 异丙醇对手术部位进行皮肤准备。对比了使用碘酒的对照组(2013-2018 年)和使用 CHG 双重清洁的 CHG 组(2019-2022 年)。评估了手术后 30 天内 SSI 的发生情况:结果:在所有手术中,SSI 总发生率为 16.4%(n = 12)。对照组的 SSI 感染率明显更高(22.6%);CHG 组未发生 SSI 感染(P = 0.029)。其他参数无明显差异。CHG组未观察到不良反应:结论:与传统的碘基皮肤制剂相比,CHG双重清洁是一种适用于新生儿重症监护室手术患者的改良方法,可有效降低SSI的发生率。这项研究支持在新生儿(包括早产儿)中安全使用 CHG,且不会出现明显的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients.

Purpose: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units.

Methods: A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed.

Results: The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group.

Conclusion: CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信