将孤立肢体输注/灌注、免疫检查点抑制剂和腔内疗法作为黑色素瘤转移患者的一线治疗方法进行比较。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35636
Danielle K. DePalo MD, Michelle M. Dugan MD, Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi MD, MPH, David W. Ollila MD, Tina J. Hieken MD, Matthew S. Block MD, PhD, Winan J. van Houdt MD, PhD, Michel W. J. M. Wouters MD, PhD, Sophie J. M. Reijers MD, Nethanel Asher MD, Kristy K. Broman MD, MPH, Zoey Duncan MD, Matilda Anderson MBBS, MPH, David E. Gyorki MD, MBBS, Hayden Snow MBBS, Jenny Held MD, Jeffrey M. Farma MD, John T. Vetto MD, Jane Y. C. Hui MD, Madison Kolbow BS, Robyn P. M. Saw MBBS, MS, Serigne N. Lo MSc, PhD, Georgina V. Long MBBS, PhD, John F. Thompson MD, Youngchul Kim PhD, Lilit Karapetyan MD, Lars Ny MD, PhD, Alexander C. J. van Akkooi MD, PhD, Roger Olofsson Bagge MD, PhD, Jonathan S. Zager MD
{"title":"将孤立肢体输注/灌注、免疫检查点抑制剂和腔内疗法作为黑色素瘤转移患者的一线治疗方法进行比较。","authors":"Danielle K. DePalo MD,&nbsp;Michelle M. Dugan MD,&nbsp;Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi MD, MPH,&nbsp;David W. Ollila MD,&nbsp;Tina J. Hieken MD,&nbsp;Matthew S. Block MD, PhD,&nbsp;Winan J. van Houdt MD, PhD,&nbsp;Michel W. J. M. Wouters MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sophie J. M. Reijers MD,&nbsp;Nethanel Asher MD,&nbsp;Kristy K. Broman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Zoey Duncan MD,&nbsp;Matilda Anderson MBBS, MPH,&nbsp;David E. Gyorki MD, MBBS,&nbsp;Hayden Snow MBBS,&nbsp;Jenny Held MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Farma MD,&nbsp;John T. Vetto MD,&nbsp;Jane Y. C. Hui MD,&nbsp;Madison Kolbow BS,&nbsp;Robyn P. M. Saw MBBS, MS,&nbsp;Serigne N. Lo MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Georgina V. Long MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;John F. Thompson MD,&nbsp;Youngchul Kim PhD,&nbsp;Lilit Karapetyan MD,&nbsp;Lars Ny MD, PhD,&nbsp;Alexander C. J. van Akkooi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Roger Olofsson Bagge MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Zager MD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Isolated limb infusion and perfusion (ILI/ILP) has been a mainstay treatment for unresectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM), but increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional therapy (talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC]) introduced several different management options. This study compares first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective review from 12 international institutions included patients treated from 1990 to 2022 with first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, or TVEC for unresectable melanoma ITM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 551 patients were treated, with ILI/ILP (<i>n</i> = 356), ICI (<i>n</i> = 125), and TVEC (<i>n</i> = 70) with median follow-up of 5.5 years. Tumor burden was highest with ILI/ILP and lowest with TVEC (<i>p</i> = .002). Breslow thickness was lowest with TVEC (<i>p</i> = .007). TVEC was mostly used in stage IIIB disease versus IIIC for ILI/ILP and ICI (<i>p</i> = .01). Using ICI as the reference category, TVEC had the highest odds of a complete response (CR) (odds ratio, 1.96; <i>p</i> = .029) and a longer local progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; <i>p</i> = .003). ILI/ILP had shorter local PFS (HR, 1.72; <i>p</i> = .012), PFS (HR, 1.79; <i>p</i> &lt; .001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR, 1.75; <i>p</i> = .014), overall survival (HR, 1.82; <i>p</i> = .009), and melanoma-specific survival (HR, 2.29; <i>p</i> = .004). Stage IIIB disease had longer DMFS (HR, 0.24; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) compared to IIIC/D.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>TVEC as first-line therapy for unresectable melanoma ITM was associated with superior CR rates and local PFS. Notably, TVEC was used in patients with a lower Breslow thickness, disease stage, and tumor burden. Therefore, when compared to ILI/ILP and ICI, TVEC should be considered as first-line therapy for unresectable stage IIIB melanoma ITM with minimal tumor burden and lower Breslow thickness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of isolated limb infusion/perfusion, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and intralesional therapy as first-line treatment for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases\",\"authors\":\"Danielle K. DePalo MD,&nbsp;Michelle M. Dugan MD,&nbsp;Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi MD, MPH,&nbsp;David W. Ollila MD,&nbsp;Tina J. Hieken MD,&nbsp;Matthew S. Block MD, PhD,&nbsp;Winan J. van Houdt MD, PhD,&nbsp;Michel W. J. M. Wouters MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sophie J. M. Reijers MD,&nbsp;Nethanel Asher MD,&nbsp;Kristy K. Broman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Zoey Duncan MD,&nbsp;Matilda Anderson MBBS, MPH,&nbsp;David E. Gyorki MD, MBBS,&nbsp;Hayden Snow MBBS,&nbsp;Jenny Held MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Farma MD,&nbsp;John T. Vetto MD,&nbsp;Jane Y. C. Hui MD,&nbsp;Madison Kolbow BS,&nbsp;Robyn P. M. Saw MBBS, MS,&nbsp;Serigne N. Lo MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Georgina V. Long MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;John F. Thompson MD,&nbsp;Youngchul Kim PhD,&nbsp;Lilit Karapetyan MD,&nbsp;Lars Ny MD, PhD,&nbsp;Alexander C. J. van Akkooi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Roger Olofsson Bagge MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Zager MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.35636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Isolated limb infusion and perfusion (ILI/ILP) has been a mainstay treatment for unresectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM), but increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional therapy (talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC]) introduced several different management options. This study compares first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective review from 12 international institutions included patients treated from 1990 to 2022 with first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, or TVEC for unresectable melanoma ITM.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 551 patients were treated, with ILI/ILP (<i>n</i> = 356), ICI (<i>n</i> = 125), and TVEC (<i>n</i> = 70) with median follow-up of 5.5 years. Tumor burden was highest with ILI/ILP and lowest with TVEC (<i>p</i> = .002). Breslow thickness was lowest with TVEC (<i>p</i> = .007). TVEC was mostly used in stage IIIB disease versus IIIC for ILI/ILP and ICI (<i>p</i> = .01). Using ICI as the reference category, TVEC had the highest odds of a complete response (CR) (odds ratio, 1.96; <i>p</i> = .029) and a longer local progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; <i>p</i> = .003). ILI/ILP had shorter local PFS (HR, 1.72; <i>p</i> = .012), PFS (HR, 1.79; <i>p</i> &lt; .001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR, 1.75; <i>p</i> = .014), overall survival (HR, 1.82; <i>p</i> = .009), and melanoma-specific survival (HR, 2.29; <i>p</i> = .004). Stage IIIB disease had longer DMFS (HR, 0.24; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) compared to IIIC/D.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>TVEC as first-line therapy for unresectable melanoma ITM was associated with superior CR rates and local PFS. Notably, TVEC was used in patients with a lower Breslow thickness, disease stage, and tumor burden. Therefore, when compared to ILI/ILP and ICI, TVEC should be considered as first-line therapy for unresectable stage IIIB melanoma ITM with minimal tumor burden and lower Breslow thickness.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35636\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:孤立肢体输注和灌注(ILI/ILP)一直是不可切除黑色素瘤转移瘤(ITM)的主要治疗方法,但免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和腔内治疗(talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC])的使用增加,带来了多种不同的治疗选择。本研究比较了一线ILI/ILP、ICI和TVEC:方法:对 12 家国际医疗机构进行回顾性研究,纳入 1990 年至 2022 年期间接受一线 ILI/ILP、ICI 或 TVEC 治疗的不可切除黑色素瘤 ITM 患者:共有551名患者接受了ILI/ILP(356人)、ICI(125人)和TVEC(70人)治疗,中位随访时间为5.5年。ILI/ILP的肿瘤负荷最高,TVEC的肿瘤负荷最低(p = .002)。TVEC 的布瑞斯洛厚度最低(p = .007)。TVEC 主要用于 IIIB 期疾病,而 ILI/ILP 和 ICI 则用于 IIIC 期(p = .01)。以 ICI 作为参考类别,TVEC 获得完全应答 (CR) 的几率最高(几率比 1.96;p = .029),局部无进展生存期 (PFS) 较长(危险比 [HR],0.40;p = .003)。ILI/ILP的局部无进展生存期(HR,1.72;p = .012)和无进展生存期(HR,1.79;p 结论:ILI/ILP的局部无进展生存期和无进展生存期均较短:TVEC 作为不可切除黑色素瘤 ITM 的一线疗法,具有较高的 CR 率和局部 PFS。值得注意的是,TVEC适用于Breslow厚度、疾病分期和肿瘤负荷较低的患者。因此,与ILI/ILP和ICI相比,TVEC应被视为肿瘤负荷最小、布瑞斯洛厚度较低的不可切除的IIIB期黑色素瘤ITM的一线疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of isolated limb infusion/perfusion, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and intralesional therapy as first-line treatment for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases

Background

Isolated limb infusion and perfusion (ILI/ILP) has been a mainstay treatment for unresectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM), but increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional therapy (talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC]) introduced several different management options. This study compares first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC.

Methods

Retrospective review from 12 international institutions included patients treated from 1990 to 2022 with first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, or TVEC for unresectable melanoma ITM.

Results

A total of 551 patients were treated, with ILI/ILP (n = 356), ICI (n = 125), and TVEC (n = 70) with median follow-up of 5.5 years. Tumor burden was highest with ILI/ILP and lowest with TVEC (p = .002). Breslow thickness was lowest with TVEC (p = .007). TVEC was mostly used in stage IIIB disease versus IIIC for ILI/ILP and ICI (p = .01). Using ICI as the reference category, TVEC had the highest odds of a complete response (CR) (odds ratio, 1.96; p = .029) and a longer local progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; p = .003). ILI/ILP had shorter local PFS (HR, 1.72; p = .012), PFS (HR, 1.79; p < .001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR, 1.75; p = .014), overall survival (HR, 1.82; p = .009), and melanoma-specific survival (HR, 2.29; p = .004). Stage IIIB disease had longer DMFS (HR, 0.24; p < .001) compared to IIIC/D.

Conclusions

TVEC as first-line therapy for unresectable melanoma ITM was associated with superior CR rates and local PFS. Notably, TVEC was used in patients with a lower Breslow thickness, disease stage, and tumor burden. Therefore, when compared to ILI/ILP and ICI, TVEC should be considered as first-line therapy for unresectable stage IIIB melanoma ITM with minimal tumor burden and lower Breslow thickness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信