实体器官移植受者中的耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌。

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Angelique E Boutzoukas, Weixiao Dai, Eric Cober, Lilian M Abbo, Lauren Komarow, Liang Chen, Carol Hill, Michael J Satlin, Matthew Grant, Bettina C Fries, Gopi Patel, Todd P McCarty, Cesar A Arias, Robert A Bonomo, David van Duin
{"title":"实体器官移植受者中的耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌。","authors":"Angelique E Boutzoukas, Weixiao Dai, Eric Cober, Lilian M Abbo, Lauren Komarow, Liang Chen, Carol Hill, Michael J Satlin, Matthew Grant, Bettina C Fries, Gopi Patel, Todd P McCarty, Cesar A Arias, Robert A Bonomo, David van Duin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an important threat to the health of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr); data comparing outcomes of SOTr with CRE to non-SOTr with CRE are lacking. A matched cohort study was performed within two prospective, multicenter, cohort studies (CRACKLE, CRACKLE-2). The epidemiology, desirability of outcome rankings (DOOR) outcomes, and mortality of SOTr and non-SOTr hospitalized in the United States (December 2011 - August 2017) with clinical isolates with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined CRE were compared. In total, 121 SOTr and 242 matched non-SOTr were included. Fifty one percent of isolates met infection criteria. SOTr were younger (p<0.001), less acutely ill (p=0.029), less often had a malignancy history (p=0.006), and more often were admitted from home (p<0.001) than non-SOTr. SOTr had more favorable adjusted DOOR outcomes; a randomly selected SOTr had a 58% (95% CI 53%-64%) probability of a better outcome as compared to a randomly selected non-SOTr. All-cause 30-day mortality was 14% (17/121) in SOTr vs. 25% (60/242) in non-SOTr, p=0.018. After stabilized inverse-probability weighted adjustment, SOTr had a 7% lower 30-d mortality risk than non-SOTr (95% CI -15%, 1%). SOTr with CRE do not have worse outcomes than matched patients without transplant history.</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in solid organ transplant recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Angelique E Boutzoukas, Weixiao Dai, Eric Cober, Lilian M Abbo, Lauren Komarow, Liang Chen, Carol Hill, Michael J Satlin, Matthew Grant, Bettina C Fries, Gopi Patel, Todd P McCarty, Cesar A Arias, Robert A Bonomo, David van Duin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an important threat to the health of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr); data comparing outcomes of SOTr with CRE to non-SOTr with CRE are lacking. A matched cohort study was performed within two prospective, multicenter, cohort studies (CRACKLE, CRACKLE-2). The epidemiology, desirability of outcome rankings (DOOR) outcomes, and mortality of SOTr and non-SOTr hospitalized in the United States (December 2011 - August 2017) with clinical isolates with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined CRE were compared. In total, 121 SOTr and 242 matched non-SOTr were included. Fifty one percent of isolates met infection criteria. SOTr were younger (p<0.001), less acutely ill (p=0.029), less often had a malignancy history (p=0.006), and more often were admitted from home (p<0.001) than non-SOTr. SOTr had more favorable adjusted DOOR outcomes; a randomly selected SOTr had a 58% (95% CI 53%-64%) probability of a better outcome as compared to a randomly selected non-SOTr. All-cause 30-day mortality was 14% (17/121) in SOTr vs. 25% (60/242) in non-SOTr, p=0.018. After stabilized inverse-probability weighted adjustment, SOTr had a 7% lower 30-d mortality risk than non-SOTr (95% CI -15%, 1%). SOTr with CRE do not have worse outcomes than matched patients without transplant history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)对实体器官移植受者(SOTr)的健康构成了严重威胁;目前还缺乏将患有 CRE 的实体器官移植受者与未患有 CRE 的实体器官移植受者的预后进行比较的数据。在两项前瞻性多中心队列研究(CRACKLE、CRACKLE-2)中进行了一项匹配队列研究。研究比较了在美国(2011 年 12 月至 2017 年 8 月)住院的、临床分离出美国疾病控制和预防中心定义的 CRE 的 SOTr 和非 SOTr 的流行病学、结果可取性排名(DOOR)结果和死亡率。总共纳入了 121 例 SOTr 和 242 例匹配的非 SOTr。51%的分离物符合感染标准。SOTr 更年轻(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in solid organ transplant recipients.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an important threat to the health of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr); data comparing outcomes of SOTr with CRE to non-SOTr with CRE are lacking. A matched cohort study was performed within two prospective, multicenter, cohort studies (CRACKLE, CRACKLE-2). The epidemiology, desirability of outcome rankings (DOOR) outcomes, and mortality of SOTr and non-SOTr hospitalized in the United States (December 2011 - August 2017) with clinical isolates with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined CRE were compared. In total, 121 SOTr and 242 matched non-SOTr were included. Fifty one percent of isolates met infection criteria. SOTr were younger (p<0.001), less acutely ill (p=0.029), less often had a malignancy history (p=0.006), and more often were admitted from home (p<0.001) than non-SOTr. SOTr had more favorable adjusted DOOR outcomes; a randomly selected SOTr had a 58% (95% CI 53%-64%) probability of a better outcome as compared to a randomly selected non-SOTr. All-cause 30-day mortality was 14% (17/121) in SOTr vs. 25% (60/242) in non-SOTr, p=0.018. After stabilized inverse-probability weighted adjustment, SOTr had a 7% lower 30-d mortality risk than non-SOTr (95% CI -15%, 1%). SOTr with CRE do not have worse outcomes than matched patients without transplant history.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信