针对背外侧前额叶皮层和轨道额叶皮层的经颅直流电刺激对重度抑郁症患者躯体症状的影响:随机、双盲、对照临床试验》。

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Shuxiang Shi, Haijing Huang, Mengke Zhang, Yiming Chen, Weichieh Yang, Fan Wang, Shuqi Kong, Ni Zhou, Zheyi Wei, Shentse Chen, Dongbin Lyu, Chenglin Wu, Qinte Huang, Qinting Zhang, Wu Hong
{"title":"针对背外侧前额叶皮层和轨道额叶皮层的经颅直流电刺激对重度抑郁症患者躯体症状的影响:随机、双盲、对照临床试验》。","authors":"Shuxiang Shi,&nbsp;Haijing Huang,&nbsp;Mengke Zhang,&nbsp;Yiming Chen,&nbsp;Weichieh Yang,&nbsp;Fan Wang,&nbsp;Shuqi Kong,&nbsp;Ni Zhou,&nbsp;Zheyi Wei,&nbsp;Shentse Chen,&nbsp;Dongbin Lyu,&nbsp;Chenglin Wu,&nbsp;Qinte Huang,&nbsp;Qinting Zhang,&nbsp;Wu Hong","doi":"10.1111/cns.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>There is a lack of research on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of somatic symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) and the suitable stimulating brain region. We investigated the efficacy of tDCS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) versus orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) on depressive somatic symptoms and somatic anxiety in patients with MDD and aimed to identify the appropriate stimulating brain regions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, a total of 70 patients diagnosed with MDD were randomly allocated into DLPFC group, OFC group, and Sham group. Subjects participated in 2 weeks of 10 primary interventions and subsequently 2-week maintenance interventions weekly (20 min, 2 mA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The DLPFC group showed a more significant improvement in somatic symptoms compared to the Sham group at week 2. At the maintenance and follow-up stages, the DLPFC group outperformed the Sham and OFC groups, but the difference with the Sham group was not significant. Neither active group demonstrated superiority over the Sham group in improving depression and anxiety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In conclusion, the tDCS targeting DLPFC may be a potentially effective therapeutic target for alleviating somatic symptoms in patients with MDD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":154,"journal":{"name":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","volume":"30 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Orbitofrontal Cortex on Somatic Symptoms in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Shuxiang Shi,&nbsp;Haijing Huang,&nbsp;Mengke Zhang,&nbsp;Yiming Chen,&nbsp;Weichieh Yang,&nbsp;Fan Wang,&nbsp;Shuqi Kong,&nbsp;Ni Zhou,&nbsp;Zheyi Wei,&nbsp;Shentse Chen,&nbsp;Dongbin Lyu,&nbsp;Chenglin Wu,&nbsp;Qinte Huang,&nbsp;Qinting Zhang,&nbsp;Wu Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cns.70110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is a lack of research on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of somatic symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) and the suitable stimulating brain region. We investigated the efficacy of tDCS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) versus orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) on depressive somatic symptoms and somatic anxiety in patients with MDD and aimed to identify the appropriate stimulating brain regions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, a total of 70 patients diagnosed with MDD were randomly allocated into DLPFC group, OFC group, and Sham group. Subjects participated in 2 weeks of 10 primary interventions and subsequently 2-week maintenance interventions weekly (20 min, 2 mA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The DLPFC group showed a more significant improvement in somatic symptoms compared to the Sham group at week 2. At the maintenance and follow-up stages, the DLPFC group outperformed the Sham and OFC groups, but the difference with the Sham group was not significant. Neither active group demonstrated superiority over the Sham group in improving depression and anxiety.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In conclusion, the tDCS targeting DLPFC may be a potentially effective therapeutic target for alleviating somatic symptoms in patients with MDD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"30 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70110\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的躯体症状以及合适的刺激脑区的研究还很缺乏。我们研究了针对背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)和眶额皮层(OFC)的经颅直流电刺激对重度抑郁症患者抑郁性躯体症状和躯体焦虑的疗效,并旨在确定合适的刺激脑区:在这项随机、双盲、假对照研究中,共有70名确诊为MDD的患者被随机分配到DLPFC组、OFC组和假组中。受试者参加了为期2周的10次初级干预,随后每周参加为期2周的维持性干预(20分钟,2毫安):结果:在第2周时,DLPFC组的躯体症状比Sham组有更明显的改善。在维持和随访阶段,DLPFC 组的表现优于 Sham 组和 OFC 组,但与 Sham 组的差异并不显著。在改善抑郁和焦虑方面,两组均未表现出优于Sham组:总之,针对 DLPFC 的 tDCS 可能是缓解 MDD 患者躯体症状的有效治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Orbitofrontal Cortex on Somatic Symptoms in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Orbitofrontal Cortex on Somatic Symptoms in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial

Aim

There is a lack of research on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of somatic symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) and the suitable stimulating brain region. We investigated the efficacy of tDCS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) versus orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) on depressive somatic symptoms and somatic anxiety in patients with MDD and aimed to identify the appropriate stimulating brain regions.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, a total of 70 patients diagnosed with MDD were randomly allocated into DLPFC group, OFC group, and Sham group. Subjects participated in 2 weeks of 10 primary interventions and subsequently 2-week maintenance interventions weekly (20 min, 2 mA).

Results

The DLPFC group showed a more significant improvement in somatic symptoms compared to the Sham group at week 2. At the maintenance and follow-up stages, the DLPFC group outperformed the Sham and OFC groups, but the difference with the Sham group was not significant. Neither active group demonstrated superiority over the Sham group in improving depression and anxiety.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the tDCS targeting DLPFC may be a potentially effective therapeutic target for alleviating somatic symptoms in patients with MDD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.70%
发文量
240
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics provides a medium for rapid publication of original clinical, experimental, and translational research papers, timely reviews and reports of novel findings of therapeutic relevance to the central nervous system, as well as papers related to clinical pharmacology, drug development and novel methodologies for drug evaluation. The journal focuses on neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and drug abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信