卡利普嗪对躁狂症 I 型双相抑郁症患者的影响:三项随机安慰剂对照临床试验的事后分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Roger S. McIntyre, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Lauren C. Aronin, Jun Yu, Huy-Binh Nguyen
{"title":"卡利普嗪对躁狂症 I 型双相抑郁症患者的影响:三项随机安慰剂对照临床试验的事后分析。","authors":"Roger S. McIntyre,&nbsp;Pierre-Michel Llorca,&nbsp;Lauren C. Aronin,&nbsp;Jun Yu,&nbsp;Huy-Binh Nguyen","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03009-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Anhedonic symptoms in bipolar I (BP-I) depression are associated with decreased quality of life and impaired functioning. We evaluated the effects of cariprazine in patients with BP-I depression with lower or higher levels of anhedonia at baseline.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were pooled from three clinical trials (NCT01396447, NCT02670538, NCT02670551) analyzing the effects of cariprazine 1.5 and 3 mg/day in adults with BP-I depression. During post hoc analysis, patients were stratified by baseline median Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) anhedonia factor score into a lower (score &lt; median) or higher (score ≥ median) anhedonia subgroup. Outcomes included change from baseline to week 6 in MADRS total and anhedonia factor score, with the latter also evaluated after adjusting for other depressive symptoms. Between-group differences in change from baseline to week 6 were compared using least-squares mean differences (LSMD) analyzed via a mixed-effect model for repeated measures.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Median baseline anhedonia factor score was 19, defining the lower (placebo = 211; cariprazine 1.5 mg/day = 200, 3 mg/day = 212) and higher (placebo = 249; cariprazine 1.5 mg/day = 261, 3 mg/day = 250) anhedonia subgroups. In the lower subgroup, cariprazine 1.5 mg/day but not 3 mg/day was superior to placebo in reducing MADRS total (LSMD [95% CI] 1.5 mg/day = − 2.61 [− 4.28, − 0.93], <i>P</i> = .0024) and anhedonia factor scores (− 1.70 [− 2.77, − 0.62], <i>P</i> = .0021) at week 6. In the higher subgroup, both cariprazine doses were associated with significantly greater reductions than placebo in MADRS total (1.5 mg/day = − 3.01 [− 4.84, − 1.19], <i>P</i> = .0012; 3 mg/day = − 3.26 [− 5.12, − 1.40], <i>P</i> = .0006) and anhedonia factor scores (1.5 mg/day = − 1.97 [− 3.13, − 0.81], <i>P</i> = .0009; 3 mg/day = − 2.07 [− 3.26, − 0.89], <i>P</i> = .0006). Anti-anhedonic effects were preserved after adjusting for other depressive symptoms, suggesting the effect was not pseudospecific. Patients in the higher subgroup had higher baseline depression and therefore the lower subgroup may have had a floor effect.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cariprazine demonstrated antidepressant and specific anti-anhedonic effects regardless of baseline anhedonia symptoms in patients with BP-I depression.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02670538, NCT02670551, NCT01396447.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 1","pages":"246 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Cariprazine on Anhedonia in Patients with Bipolar I Depression: Post Hoc Analysis of Three Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials\",\"authors\":\"Roger S. McIntyre,&nbsp;Pierre-Michel Llorca,&nbsp;Lauren C. Aronin,&nbsp;Jun Yu,&nbsp;Huy-Binh Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-03009-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Anhedonic symptoms in bipolar I (BP-I) depression are associated with decreased quality of life and impaired functioning. We evaluated the effects of cariprazine in patients with BP-I depression with lower or higher levels of anhedonia at baseline.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were pooled from three clinical trials (NCT01396447, NCT02670538, NCT02670551) analyzing the effects of cariprazine 1.5 and 3 mg/day in adults with BP-I depression. During post hoc analysis, patients were stratified by baseline median Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) anhedonia factor score into a lower (score &lt; median) or higher (score ≥ median) anhedonia subgroup. Outcomes included change from baseline to week 6 in MADRS total and anhedonia factor score, with the latter also evaluated after adjusting for other depressive symptoms. Between-group differences in change from baseline to week 6 were compared using least-squares mean differences (LSMD) analyzed via a mixed-effect model for repeated measures.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Median baseline anhedonia factor score was 19, defining the lower (placebo = 211; cariprazine 1.5 mg/day = 200, 3 mg/day = 212) and higher (placebo = 249; cariprazine 1.5 mg/day = 261, 3 mg/day = 250) anhedonia subgroups. In the lower subgroup, cariprazine 1.5 mg/day but not 3 mg/day was superior to placebo in reducing MADRS total (LSMD [95% CI] 1.5 mg/day = − 2.61 [− 4.28, − 0.93], <i>P</i> = .0024) and anhedonia factor scores (− 1.70 [− 2.77, − 0.62], <i>P</i> = .0021) at week 6. In the higher subgroup, both cariprazine doses were associated with significantly greater reductions than placebo in MADRS total (1.5 mg/day = − 3.01 [− 4.84, − 1.19], <i>P</i> = .0012; 3 mg/day = − 3.26 [− 5.12, − 1.40], <i>P</i> = .0006) and anhedonia factor scores (1.5 mg/day = − 1.97 [− 3.13, − 0.81], <i>P</i> = .0009; 3 mg/day = − 2.07 [− 3.26, − 0.89], <i>P</i> = .0006). Anti-anhedonic effects were preserved after adjusting for other depressive symptoms, suggesting the effect was not pseudospecific. Patients in the higher subgroup had higher baseline depression and therefore the lower subgroup may have had a floor effect.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cariprazine demonstrated antidepressant and specific anti-anhedonic effects regardless of baseline anhedonia symptoms in patients with BP-I depression.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02670538, NCT02670551, NCT01396447.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"246 - 260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03009-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03009-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介双相抑郁症(BP-I)的失乐症状与生活质量下降和功能受损有关。我们评估了卡非拉嗪对基线失乐症水平较低或较高的 I 型双相抑郁症患者的影响:汇集了三项临床试验(NCT01396447、NCT02670538、NCT02670551)的数据,这些试验分析了卡哌嗪 1.5 毫克/天和 3 毫克/天对 BP-I 抑郁症成人患者的影响。在事后分析过程中,根据蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)失乐症因子的基线中位数得分,将患者分为较低的分值结果:基线失乐症因子得分中位数为19分,由此划分出失乐症较低亚组(安慰剂=211分;卡哌嗪1.5毫克/天=200分,3毫克/天=212分)和失乐症较高亚组(安慰剂=249分;卡哌嗪1.5毫克/天=261分,3毫克/天=250分)。在低度亚组中,卡哌嗪 1.5 毫克/天(而非 3 毫克/天)在降低第 6 周时的 MADRS 总分(LSMD [95% CI] 1.5 毫克/天 = - 2.61 [- 4.28, - 0.93],P = .0024)和失乐症因子分(- 1.70 [- 2.77, - 0.62],P = .0021)方面优于安慰剂。在较高亚组中,两种卡哌嗪剂量对 MADRS 总分的降低幅度均显著高于安慰剂(1.5 毫克/天 = - 3.01 [- 4.84, - 1.19],P = .0012;3 毫克/天 = - 3.26 [- 5.12, - 1.40],P = .0006)和失神因子得分(1.5 mg/day = - 1.97 [- 3.13, - 0.81],P = .0009;3 mg/day = - 2.07 [- 3.26, - 0.89],P = .0006)。在对其他抑郁症状进行调整后,抗失眠效果依然存在,这表明该效果并非假性特异性。高分组患者的基线抑郁程度较高,因此低分组可能具有底线效应:结论:卡哌拉嗪对BP-I抑郁症患者具有抗抑郁和特异性抗失神作用,与基线失神症状无关:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02670538、NCT02670551、NCT01396447。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Cariprazine on Anhedonia in Patients with Bipolar I Depression: Post Hoc Analysis of Three Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

Introduction

Anhedonic symptoms in bipolar I (BP-I) depression are associated with decreased quality of life and impaired functioning. We evaluated the effects of cariprazine in patients with BP-I depression with lower or higher levels of anhedonia at baseline.

Methods

Data were pooled from three clinical trials (NCT01396447, NCT02670538, NCT02670551) analyzing the effects of cariprazine 1.5 and 3 mg/day in adults with BP-I depression. During post hoc analysis, patients were stratified by baseline median Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) anhedonia factor score into a lower (score < median) or higher (score ≥ median) anhedonia subgroup. Outcomes included change from baseline to week 6 in MADRS total and anhedonia factor score, with the latter also evaluated after adjusting for other depressive symptoms. Between-group differences in change from baseline to week 6 were compared using least-squares mean differences (LSMD) analyzed via a mixed-effect model for repeated measures.

Results

Median baseline anhedonia factor score was 19, defining the lower (placebo = 211; cariprazine 1.5 mg/day = 200, 3 mg/day = 212) and higher (placebo = 249; cariprazine 1.5 mg/day = 261, 3 mg/day = 250) anhedonia subgroups. In the lower subgroup, cariprazine 1.5 mg/day but not 3 mg/day was superior to placebo in reducing MADRS total (LSMD [95% CI] 1.5 mg/day = − 2.61 [− 4.28, − 0.93], P = .0024) and anhedonia factor scores (− 1.70 [− 2.77, − 0.62], P = .0021) at week 6. In the higher subgroup, both cariprazine doses were associated with significantly greater reductions than placebo in MADRS total (1.5 mg/day = − 3.01 [− 4.84, − 1.19], P = .0012; 3 mg/day = − 3.26 [− 5.12, − 1.40], P = .0006) and anhedonia factor scores (1.5 mg/day = − 1.97 [− 3.13, − 0.81], P = .0009; 3 mg/day = − 2.07 [− 3.26, − 0.89], P = .0006). Anti-anhedonic effects were preserved after adjusting for other depressive symptoms, suggesting the effect was not pseudospecific. Patients in the higher subgroup had higher baseline depression and therefore the lower subgroup may have had a floor effect.

Conclusion

Cariprazine demonstrated antidepressant and specific anti-anhedonic effects regardless of baseline anhedonia symptoms in patients with BP-I depression.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02670538, NCT02670551, NCT01396447.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信