Pedro B Carneiro, Sarit Golub, Asa E Radix, Nicholas Grosskopf, Christian Grov
{"title":"在美国全国 PrEP 使用者样本中描述事件驱动的 PrEP 使用情况,并调查其与 PrEP 相关障碍经历的关联。","authors":"Pedro B Carneiro, Sarit Golub, Asa E Radix, Nicholas Grosskopf, Christian Grov","doi":"10.1007/s10461-024-04546-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a decade of implementation in the US, PrEP uptake remains underutilized by communities that would greatly benefit from it. Event-Driven (ED) PrEP is a potential avenue to increase uptake, however very little is known about its use in the US. We analyzed data derived from Together 5000, an internet-based U.S. national cohort of Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) individuals aged 16-49 years and at risk for HIV. First, we looked at predictors of ED PrEP use using a framework based on current US-based PrEP implementation-related variables. Then, we explored whether experiencing certain types of barriers were associated with choice of ED PrEP over daily PrEP using logistic regression analysis. Our findings showed that variables related to education and sexual behaviors were associated with ED PrEP choice, while experiencing barriers to daily PrEP had no effect. We found a gradient effect with education, where individuals who reported having some college had 3 times the odds of taking ED PrEP, those reporting a bachelor's degree had 3.25 times the odds, and those with graduate school education had 7.56 times the odds of choosing ED PrEP compared to those with a high school diploma or less. Individuals who reported having 2 or more hours of lead time for sex had 3.35 times the odds of using ED PrEP (aOR = 3.35, 95% CI 2.23-5.47). Participants who reported having an STI within the last 6 months had 60% lower odds of using ED PrEP (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.72). The use of ED PrEP is a promising pathway for expanding PrEP due to its success and protection levels. Our studies indicated that educational background and behavior influence PrEP choice. Ensuring PrEP candidates and users have access to information about new PrEP types may increase uptake and support implementation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Event-Driven PrEP Use and Investigating its Association with Experiences of PrEP-Related Barriers Among a US National Sample of PrEP Users.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro B Carneiro, Sarit Golub, Asa E Radix, Nicholas Grosskopf, Christian Grov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10461-024-04546-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After a decade of implementation in the US, PrEP uptake remains underutilized by communities that would greatly benefit from it. Event-Driven (ED) PrEP is a potential avenue to increase uptake, however very little is known about its use in the US. We analyzed data derived from Together 5000, an internet-based U.S. national cohort of Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) individuals aged 16-49 years and at risk for HIV. First, we looked at predictors of ED PrEP use using a framework based on current US-based PrEP implementation-related variables. Then, we explored whether experiencing certain types of barriers were associated with choice of ED PrEP over daily PrEP using logistic regression analysis. Our findings showed that variables related to education and sexual behaviors were associated with ED PrEP choice, while experiencing barriers to daily PrEP had no effect. We found a gradient effect with education, where individuals who reported having some college had 3 times the odds of taking ED PrEP, those reporting a bachelor's degree had 3.25 times the odds, and those with graduate school education had 7.56 times the odds of choosing ED PrEP compared to those with a high school diploma or less. Individuals who reported having 2 or more hours of lead time for sex had 3.35 times the odds of using ED PrEP (aOR = 3.35, 95% CI 2.23-5.47). Participants who reported having an STI within the last 6 months had 60% lower odds of using ED PrEP (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.72). The use of ED PrEP is a promising pathway for expanding PrEP due to its success and protection levels. Our studies indicated that educational background and behavior influence PrEP choice. Ensuring PrEP candidates and users have access to information about new PrEP types may increase uptake and support implementation efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04546-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04546-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
PrEP 已在美国实施了十年,但仍未被那些将从中受益匪浅的社区充分利用。事件驱动(ED)PrEP 是提高使用率的一个潜在途径,但人们对其在美国的使用情况知之甚少。我们对来自 Together 5000 的数据进行了分析,这是一个基于互联网的美国全国性少数性与性别群体(SGM)队列,成员年龄在 16-49 岁之间,均有感染艾滋病毒的风险。首先,我们使用一个基于当前美国 PrEP 实施相关变量的框架来研究 ED PrEP 使用的预测因素。然后,我们利用逻辑回归分析探讨了某些类型的障碍是否与选择 ED PrEP 而非日常 PrEP 相关。我们的研究结果表明,与教育和性行为相关的变量与选择 ED PrEP 相关,而遭遇日常 PrEP 的障碍则没有影响。我们发现,教育程度会产生梯度效应,与高中或高中以下学历的人相比,报告拥有一些大学学历的人选择 ED PrEP 的几率是后者的 3 倍,报告拥有学士学位的人选择 ED PrEP 的几率是后者的 3.25 倍,拥有研究生学历的人选择 ED PrEP 的几率是后者的 7.56 倍。报告称性爱前准备时间为 2 小时或 2 小时以上的人使用 ED PrEP 的几率是普通人的 3.35 倍(aOR = 3.35,95% CI 2.23-5.47)。报告在过去 6 个月内感染过性传播疾病的参与者使用 ED PrEP 的几率要低 60%(aOR = 0.4,95% CI 0.2-0.72)。由于 ED PrEP 的成功率和保护水平,使用 ED PrEP 是推广 PrEP 的一个很有前景的途径。我们的研究表明,教育背景和行为会影响 PrEP 的选择。确保 PrEP 候选者和使用者能够获得有关新型 PrEP 的信息,可提高接受率并支持实施工作。
Characterizing Event-Driven PrEP Use and Investigating its Association with Experiences of PrEP-Related Barriers Among a US National Sample of PrEP Users.
After a decade of implementation in the US, PrEP uptake remains underutilized by communities that would greatly benefit from it. Event-Driven (ED) PrEP is a potential avenue to increase uptake, however very little is known about its use in the US. We analyzed data derived from Together 5000, an internet-based U.S. national cohort of Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) individuals aged 16-49 years and at risk for HIV. First, we looked at predictors of ED PrEP use using a framework based on current US-based PrEP implementation-related variables. Then, we explored whether experiencing certain types of barriers were associated with choice of ED PrEP over daily PrEP using logistic regression analysis. Our findings showed that variables related to education and sexual behaviors were associated with ED PrEP choice, while experiencing barriers to daily PrEP had no effect. We found a gradient effect with education, where individuals who reported having some college had 3 times the odds of taking ED PrEP, those reporting a bachelor's degree had 3.25 times the odds, and those with graduate school education had 7.56 times the odds of choosing ED PrEP compared to those with a high school diploma or less. Individuals who reported having 2 or more hours of lead time for sex had 3.35 times the odds of using ED PrEP (aOR = 3.35, 95% CI 2.23-5.47). Participants who reported having an STI within the last 6 months had 60% lower odds of using ED PrEP (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.72). The use of ED PrEP is a promising pathway for expanding PrEP due to its success and protection levels. Our studies indicated that educational background and behavior influence PrEP choice. Ensuring PrEP candidates and users have access to information about new PrEP types may increase uptake and support implementation efforts.
期刊介绍:
AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76