口腔癌窄带成像并不能改善肿瘤边界的可视化:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Olof Nilsson, Mathias von Beckerath, Johan Knutsson, Fredrik J Landström
{"title":"口腔癌窄带成像并不能改善肿瘤边界的可视化:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Olof Nilsson, Mathias von Beckerath, Johan Knutsson, Fredrik J Landström","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2418334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In oral cancers, tumour borders are typically defined by white light (WL). Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique commonly used for the larynx and for cancers of unknown primary. However, evidence for using NBI in oral cancers is insufficient.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>We investigated whether NBI is a better predictor of the true mucosal tumour borders than WL in oral cancers. Additionally, we examined the agreement between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and pathology reports.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, the tumour borders were assessed by both NBI and WL at the time of surgical resection and then compared. Pathology reports of the examined areas were used as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine participants were included. After exclusion of 15 patients due to missing data, 34 were included in analyses. In 26.5% of the assessments, the tumour borders defined by NBI were outside the borders defined by WL. However, 55.5% of these were false-positives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The delineation of mucosal tumour borders in oral cancers by NBI was not better than that by WL in this study. Several methodological challenges may have influenced the findings of this study, similar to the limitations reported in previous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Olof Nilsson, Mathias von Beckerath, Johan Knutsson, Fredrik J Landström\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2418334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In oral cancers, tumour borders are typically defined by white light (WL). Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique commonly used for the larynx and for cancers of unknown primary. However, evidence for using NBI in oral cancers is insufficient.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>We investigated whether NBI is a better predictor of the true mucosal tumour borders than WL in oral cancers. Additionally, we examined the agreement between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and pathology reports.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, the tumour borders were assessed by both NBI and WL at the time of surgical resection and then compared. Pathology reports of the examined areas were used as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine participants were included. After exclusion of 15 patients due to missing data, 34 were included in analyses. In 26.5% of the assessments, the tumour borders defined by NBI were outside the borders defined by WL. However, 55.5% of these were false-positives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The delineation of mucosal tumour borders in oral cancers by NBI was not better than that by WL in this study. Several methodological challenges may have influenced the findings of this study, similar to the limitations reported in previous studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2418334\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2418334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在口腔癌中,肿瘤边界通常由白光(WL)确定。窄带成像(NBI)是一种光学内窥镜技术,常用于喉癌和原发灶不明的癌症。然而,在口腔癌中使用 NBI 的证据不足:我们研究了在口腔癌中,NBI 是否比 WL 更能预测真实的粘膜肿瘤边界。此外,我们还研究了基于 NBI 的高野毛细血管内环分类与病理报告之间的一致性:在这项前瞻性研究中,我们在手术切除时用 NBI 和 WL 评估肿瘤边界,然后进行比较。检查区域的病理报告作为金标准:结果:共纳入 49 名参与者。结果:共纳入 49 名参与者,其中 15 名患者因数据缺失而被排除,34 名患者被纳入分析。在 26.5% 的评估中,NBI 界定的肿瘤边界在 WL 界定的边界之外。然而,其中55.5%为假阳性:本研究中,NBI 对口腔癌粘膜肿瘤边界的划分并不比 WL 好。一些方法上的挑战可能影响了本研究的结果,这与之前研究中报告的局限性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study.

Background: In oral cancers, tumour borders are typically defined by white light (WL). Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique commonly used for the larynx and for cancers of unknown primary. However, evidence for using NBI in oral cancers is insufficient.

Aims/objectives: We investigated whether NBI is a better predictor of the true mucosal tumour borders than WL in oral cancers. Additionally, we examined the agreement between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and pathology reports.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, the tumour borders were assessed by both NBI and WL at the time of surgical resection and then compared. Pathology reports of the examined areas were used as gold standard.

Results: Forty-nine participants were included. After exclusion of 15 patients due to missing data, 34 were included in analyses. In 26.5% of the assessments, the tumour borders defined by NBI were outside the borders defined by WL. However, 55.5% of these were false-positives.

Conclusions and significance: The delineation of mucosal tumour borders in oral cancers by NBI was not better than that by WL in this study. Several methodological challenges may have influenced the findings of this study, similar to the limitations reported in previous studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信