从患者和医务工作者的角度看他们对描述营养不良的术语的看法和理解:定性研究的元综合。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sarah Mackay, Alita Rushton, Jack Bell, Adrienne Young
{"title":"从患者和医务工作者的角度看他们对描述营养不良的术语的看法和理解:定性研究的元综合。","authors":"Sarah Mackay, Alita Rushton, Jack Bell, Adrienne Young","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition is prevalent across healthcare settings and has adverse outcomes for patients and the health system. However, some patients do not recall being informed about their malnutrition risk/diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-synthesis of qualitative studies aimed to identify and synthesise patient, carer and health worker perceptions and understanding of the terminology used by health workers for malnutrition risk/malnutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were searched (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase) up until August 2023. Title, abstract and full text screening were independently completed by 2 reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Studies Checklist. Data were analysed by the review team using thematic synthesis. The resulting themes informed review findings. The confidence in each finding was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies were included contributing perspectives from patients (n=7 studies), health workers (n=5 studies) or both patients and health workers (n=5 studies); no studies included carer perspectives. There were 5 themes: \"Patients have differing understanding, interpretation of, and identification with malnutrition risk and malnutrition terminology\" (very low confidence); \"Health workers perceive that patients do not identify with or understand malnutrition risk and malnutrition terminology\" (low confidence); \"Patients do not routinely perceive their malnutrition risk or malnutrition diagnosis as problematic\" (low confidence); \"Health workers use varied terminology for malnutrition risk and malnutrition\" (low confidence); \"Action is required to improve malnutrition diagnostic communication\" (low confidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlighted disparity in patients' perspectives regarding the terms used for malnutrition risk and malnutrition. Varied terms were used by health workers and patients did not often associate these terms with a health condition that required treatment. Health workers and patients called for action to improve the communication of malnutrition. To do this, further research exploring malnutrition terminology and the broader concept of malnutrition communication is required with patients, carers and health workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The perception and understanding of the terminology used to describe malnutrition from the perspective of patients and health workers: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Mackay, Alita Rushton, Jack Bell, Adrienne Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition is prevalent across healthcare settings and has adverse outcomes for patients and the health system. However, some patients do not recall being informed about their malnutrition risk/diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-synthesis of qualitative studies aimed to identify and synthesise patient, carer and health worker perceptions and understanding of the terminology used by health workers for malnutrition risk/malnutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were searched (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase) up until August 2023. Title, abstract and full text screening were independently completed by 2 reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Studies Checklist. Data were analysed by the review team using thematic synthesis. The resulting themes informed review findings. The confidence in each finding was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies were included contributing perspectives from patients (n=7 studies), health workers (n=5 studies) or both patients and health workers (n=5 studies); no studies included carer perspectives. There were 5 themes: \\\"Patients have differing understanding, interpretation of, and identification with malnutrition risk and malnutrition terminology\\\" (very low confidence); \\\"Health workers perceive that patients do not identify with or understand malnutrition risk and malnutrition terminology\\\" (low confidence); \\\"Patients do not routinely perceive their malnutrition risk or malnutrition diagnosis as problematic\\\" (low confidence); \\\"Health workers use varied terminology for malnutrition risk and malnutrition\\\" (low confidence); \\\"Action is required to improve malnutrition diagnostic communication\\\" (low confidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlighted disparity in patients' perspectives regarding the terms used for malnutrition risk and malnutrition. Varied terms were used by health workers and patients did not often associate these terms with a health condition that required treatment. Health workers and patients called for action to improve the communication of malnutrition. To do this, further research exploring malnutrition terminology and the broader concept of malnutrition communication is required with patients, carers and health workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:营养不良在各种医疗机构中普遍存在,并对患者和医疗系统造成不利影响。然而,一些患者并不记得自己曾被告知营养不良的风险/诊断:这项定性研究的元综述旨在确定和综合患者、护理者和医务工作者对医务工作者使用的营养不良风险/营养不良术语的看法和理解:检索了截至 2023 年 8 月的四个数据库(Medline、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Embase)。标题、摘要和全文筛选由两名审稿人独立完成。采用 "批判性评价技能计划定性研究核对表 "对纳入研究的质量进行评估。综述小组采用主题综合法对数据进行分析。由此得出的主题为综述结果提供了依据。采用 GRADE-CERQual 对每项研究结果的可信度进行评估:共有 17 项研究纳入了患者(7 项研究)、医护人员(5 项研究)或患者和医护人员(5 项研究)的观点;没有研究纳入照护者的观点。共有 5 个主题:"患者对营养不良风险和营养不良术语有不同的理解、解释和认同"(置信度极低);"医务工作者认为患者不认同或不理解营养不良风险和营养不良术语"(置信度低);"患者通常不认为他们的营养不良风险或营养不良诊断有问题"(置信度低);"医务工作者对营养不良风险和营养不良使用不同的术语"(置信度低);"需要采取行动改善营养不良诊断沟通"(置信度低)。结论研究结果表明,患者对营养不良风险和营养不良所用术语的看法存在差异。医务工作者使用的术语多种多样,而患者通常不会将这些术语与需要治疗的健康状况联系起来。医务工作者和患者呼吁采取行动,改善营养不良的沟通。为此,需要与患者、照护者和医务工作者开展进一步研究,探索营养不良术语和更广泛的营养不良沟通概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The perception and understanding of the terminology used to describe malnutrition from the perspective of patients and health workers: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Background: Malnutrition is prevalent across healthcare settings and has adverse outcomes for patients and the health system. However, some patients do not recall being informed about their malnutrition risk/diagnosis.

Objective: This meta-synthesis of qualitative studies aimed to identify and synthesise patient, carer and health worker perceptions and understanding of the terminology used by health workers for malnutrition risk/malnutrition.

Methods: Four databases were searched (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase) up until August 2023. Title, abstract and full text screening were independently completed by 2 reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Studies Checklist. Data were analysed by the review team using thematic synthesis. The resulting themes informed review findings. The confidence in each finding was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.

Results: Seventeen studies were included contributing perspectives from patients (n=7 studies), health workers (n=5 studies) or both patients and health workers (n=5 studies); no studies included carer perspectives. There were 5 themes: "Patients have differing understanding, interpretation of, and identification with malnutrition risk and malnutrition terminology" (very low confidence); "Health workers perceive that patients do not identify with or understand malnutrition risk and malnutrition terminology" (low confidence); "Patients do not routinely perceive their malnutrition risk or malnutrition diagnosis as problematic" (low confidence); "Health workers use varied terminology for malnutrition risk and malnutrition" (low confidence); "Action is required to improve malnutrition diagnostic communication" (low confidence).

Conclusions: Findings highlighted disparity in patients' perspectives regarding the terms used for malnutrition risk and malnutrition. Varied terms were used by health workers and patients did not often associate these terms with a health condition that required treatment. Health workers and patients called for action to improve the communication of malnutrition. To do this, further research exploring malnutrition terminology and the broader concept of malnutrition communication is required with patients, carers and health workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信