Danhua Yang, Xiaoyang Jia, Tianxiang Xia, Nan Zhang, Shiming Su, Zhenghua Tao, Zhiyuan Wu, Jing Liang, Lina Zhang
{"title":"利用多介质当量剂量和局部暴露参数得出砷污染场地修复目标的新见解","authors":"Danhua Yang, Xiaoyang Jia, Tianxiang Xia, Nan Zhang, Shiming Su, Zhenghua Tao, Zhiyuan Wu, Jing Liang, Lina Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The remediation goal (RG) for arsenic (As) calculated by the traditional method is approximately 0.45<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>, significantly lower than the background values. This poses significant challenges for the management of As-contaminated sites. The present study focused on a typical glassworks site with an As contamination level of up to 298<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>, predominantly existing as As (III), with a carcinogenic risk level as high as 8.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup>. We developed a novel method known as multi-media-equivalent dose (MMED), incorporating local exposure parameters, and investigated the impacts of site-specific bioaccessibility (from 6.9% to 51.5%) on the results. The RG of arsenic calculated via MMED was 34.4<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> and 54<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> when bioaccessibility was considered. Integrating with five exposure parameters across 31 provinces, the provincial remediation goals (PRGs) ranged from 15.1 to 31.7<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>. The RG calculated using the new method were more aligned with the practical conditions of managing As-contaminated sites, with potential for broader implementation across various provinces.","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel insight into deriving remediation goals of arsenic contaminated sites with multi-media-equivalent dose and local exposure parameters\",\"authors\":\"Danhua Yang, Xiaoyang Jia, Tianxiang Xia, Nan Zhang, Shiming Su, Zhenghua Tao, Zhiyuan Wu, Jing Liang, Lina Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The remediation goal (RG) for arsenic (As) calculated by the traditional method is approximately 0.45<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>, significantly lower than the background values. This poses significant challenges for the management of As-contaminated sites. The present study focused on a typical glassworks site with an As contamination level of up to 298<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>, predominantly existing as As (III), with a carcinogenic risk level as high as 8.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup>. We developed a novel method known as multi-media-equivalent dose (MMED), incorporating local exposure parameters, and investigated the impacts of site-specific bioaccessibility (from 6.9% to 51.5%) on the results. The RG of arsenic calculated via MMED was 34.4<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> and 54<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> when bioaccessibility was considered. Integrating with five exposure parameters across 31 provinces, the provincial remediation goals (PRGs) ranged from 15.1 to 31.7<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>. The RG calculated using the new method were more aligned with the practical conditions of managing As-contaminated sites, with potential for broader implementation across various provinces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Chemical Health & Safety\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Chemical Health & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novel insight into deriving remediation goals of arsenic contaminated sites with multi-media-equivalent dose and local exposure parameters
The remediation goal (RG) for arsenic (As) calculated by the traditional method is approximately 0.45 mg·kg-1, significantly lower than the background values. This poses significant challenges for the management of As-contaminated sites. The present study focused on a typical glassworks site with an As contamination level of up to 298 mg·kg-1, predominantly existing as As (III), with a carcinogenic risk level as high as 8.6 × 10-5. We developed a novel method known as multi-media-equivalent dose (MMED), incorporating local exposure parameters, and investigated the impacts of site-specific bioaccessibility (from 6.9% to 51.5%) on the results. The RG of arsenic calculated via MMED was 34.4 mg·kg-1 and 54 mg·kg-1 when bioaccessibility was considered. Integrating with five exposure parameters across 31 provinces, the provincial remediation goals (PRGs) ranged from 15.1 to 31.7 mg·kg-1. The RG calculated using the new method were more aligned with the practical conditions of managing As-contaminated sites, with potential for broader implementation across various provinces.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety focuses on news, information, and ideas relating to issues and advances in chemical health and safety. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety covers up-to-the minute, in-depth views of safety issues ranging from OSHA and EPA regulations to the safe handling of hazardous waste, from the latest innovations in effective chemical hygiene practices to the courts'' most recent rulings on safety-related lawsuits. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety presents real-world information that health, safety and environmental professionals and others responsible for the safety of their workplaces can put to use right away, identifying potential and developing safety concerns before they do real harm.