Melle A. Spruijt, Wenche M. Klerkx, Kim Notten, Hugo van Eijndhoven, Leonie Speksnijder, Manon H. Kerkhof, Kirsten B. Kluivers
{"title":"慢性盆腔疼痛患者盆底肌肉注射肉毒杆菌毒素 A 的疗效:双盲随机对照试验","authors":"Melle A. Spruijt, Wenche M. Klerkx, Kim Notten, Hugo van Eijndhoven, Leonie Speksnijder, Manon H. Kerkhof, Kirsten B. Kluivers","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections versus placebo injections, combined with pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Randomised, double-blinded clinical trial (January 2020–April 2023).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>This multicentre study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population and Sample</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-four women with CPP and increased pelvic floor muscle tone despite previous PFMT, were enrolled.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants received either BTA injections (100 units) or placebo injections into the pelvic floor muscle, followed by four PFMT sessions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcomes and Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Primary outcomes included the number of women with at least a 33% reduction in pain and those reporting (very) much improvement of their pain. Secondary outcomes covered quality of life and pelvic floor function. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-treatment. Mixed models for repeated measurements were used for analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A 33% reduction or more in average pain score was reported by 15 participants (33%) after BTA treatment and 9 participants (20%) after placebo treatment (odd ratio placebo/BTA 1.88; 95% CI 0.72–4.90, <i>p</i> = 0.19). In both groups, 8 women (17%) reported their improvement as (very) much better (odd ratio placebo/BTA 0.947; 95% CI 0.32–2.80, <i>p</i> = 0.92). Pelvic floor resting activity decreased significantly after BTA treatment compared to placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results from this study do not support the use of BTA injections in the management of CPP in women.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 3","pages":"297-305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17991","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Pelvic Floor Muscles in Chronic Pelvic Pain Patients: A Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Melle A. Spruijt, Wenche M. Klerkx, Kim Notten, Hugo van Eijndhoven, Leonie Speksnijder, Manon H. Kerkhof, Kirsten B. Kluivers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.17991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections versus placebo injections, combined with pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Randomised, double-blinded clinical trial (January 2020–April 2023).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>This multicentre study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population and Sample</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety-four women with CPP and increased pelvic floor muscle tone despite previous PFMT, were enrolled.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants received either BTA injections (100 units) or placebo injections into the pelvic floor muscle, followed by four PFMT sessions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcomes and Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Primary outcomes included the number of women with at least a 33% reduction in pain and those reporting (very) much improvement of their pain. Secondary outcomes covered quality of life and pelvic floor function. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-treatment. Mixed models for repeated measurements were used for analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A 33% reduction or more in average pain score was reported by 15 participants (33%) after BTA treatment and 9 participants (20%) after placebo treatment (odd ratio placebo/BTA 1.88; 95% CI 0.72–4.90, <i>p</i> = 0.19). In both groups, 8 women (17%) reported their improvement as (very) much better (odd ratio placebo/BTA 0.947; 95% CI 0.32–2.80, <i>p</i> = 0.92). Pelvic floor resting activity decreased significantly after BTA treatment compared to placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results from this study do not support the use of BTA injections in the management of CPP in women.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 3\",\"pages\":\"297-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17991\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17991\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17991","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估和比较肉毒杆菌毒素 A (BTA) 注射与安慰剂注射以及盆底肌肉疗法 (PFMT) 在慢性盆腔痛 (CPP) 女性患者中的疗效和安全性。
The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Pelvic Floor Muscles in Chronic Pelvic Pain Patients: A Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
Objective
To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections versus placebo injections, combined with pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).
This multicentre study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands.
Population and Sample
Ninety-four women with CPP and increased pelvic floor muscle tone despite previous PFMT, were enrolled.
Methods
Participants received either BTA injections (100 units) or placebo injections into the pelvic floor muscle, followed by four PFMT sessions.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Primary outcomes included the number of women with at least a 33% reduction in pain and those reporting (very) much improvement of their pain. Secondary outcomes covered quality of life and pelvic floor function. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-treatment. Mixed models for repeated measurements were used for analysis.
Results
A 33% reduction or more in average pain score was reported by 15 participants (33%) after BTA treatment and 9 participants (20%) after placebo treatment (odd ratio placebo/BTA 1.88; 95% CI 0.72–4.90, p = 0.19). In both groups, 8 women (17%) reported their improvement as (very) much better (odd ratio placebo/BTA 0.947; 95% CI 0.32–2.80, p = 0.92). Pelvic floor resting activity decreased significantly after BTA treatment compared to placebo (p = 0.001).
Conclusion
The results from this study do not support the use of BTA injections in the management of CPP in women.
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.