利用温度-真空摆动吸附模型探索填料床和整体接触器的几何特性和循环设计,以直接捕获空气

IF 3.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Valentina Stampi-Bombelli,  and , Marco Mazzotti*, 
{"title":"利用温度-真空摆动吸附模型探索填料床和整体接触器的几何特性和循环设计,以直接捕获空气","authors":"Valentina Stampi-Bombelli,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Marco Mazzotti*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0230310.1021/acs.iecr.4c02303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study presents a comprehensive comparison between the packed bed and monolith contactor configurations for direct air capture (DAC) via process modeling of a temperature-vacuum swing adsorption (TVSA) process. We investigate various design parameters to optimize performance across different contactor geometries, including pellet size, monolith wall thickness, active sorbent content in monoliths, and packed bed structure configurations, considering both a traditional long column (PB<sub>40</sub>) and multiple shorter columns configured in parallel (PB<sub>5</sub>). Our parametric analysis assesses specific exergy consumption, sorbent, and volume requirements across different operating conditions of a five-step TVSA cycle. For minimizing sorbent requirements, PB<sub>5</sub> and monoliths with over 80% sorbent loading were the best-performing contactor designs with overlapping performance in the low-exergy region. Beyond this region, PB<sub>5</sub> faced limitations in reducing sorbent requirements further and was constrained by a maximum velocity at which it is sensible to operate without substantially increasing the exergy demand. In contrast, monoliths decreased sorbent requirements with minimal exergy increase due to reduced mass transfer resistances and lower pressure drop associated with their thin walls. The analysis of volume requirement-specific exergy Pareto fronts revealed that PB<sub>5</sub> was less competitive with this metric due to the requirements for additional void space in the contactor configuration. The study also revealed that optimal sorbent loading for reducing volume requirements in monoliths differed from those minimizing sorbent usage, with the most effective loading being below 100%. Thus, the optimal contactor design varies depending on the goals of minimizing sorbent and volume requirements, and the choice and design of the contactor will depend on the relative costs of these factors. Lastly, our findings challenge the assumption that higher velocities are always preferable for direct air capture, suggesting instead that the operating velocity depends on the contactor configuration.</p>","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"63 45","pages":"19728–19743 19728–19743"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02303","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Geometric Properties and Cycle Design in Packed Bed and Monolith Contactors Using Temperature-Vacuum Swing Adsorption Modeling for Direct Air Capture\",\"authors\":\"Valentina Stampi-Bombelli,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Marco Mazzotti*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0230310.1021/acs.iecr.4c02303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This study presents a comprehensive comparison between the packed bed and monolith contactor configurations for direct air capture (DAC) via process modeling of a temperature-vacuum swing adsorption (TVSA) process. We investigate various design parameters to optimize performance across different contactor geometries, including pellet size, monolith wall thickness, active sorbent content in monoliths, and packed bed structure configurations, considering both a traditional long column (PB<sub>40</sub>) and multiple shorter columns configured in parallel (PB<sub>5</sub>). Our parametric analysis assesses specific exergy consumption, sorbent, and volume requirements across different operating conditions of a five-step TVSA cycle. For minimizing sorbent requirements, PB<sub>5</sub> and monoliths with over 80% sorbent loading were the best-performing contactor designs with overlapping performance in the low-exergy region. Beyond this region, PB<sub>5</sub> faced limitations in reducing sorbent requirements further and was constrained by a maximum velocity at which it is sensible to operate without substantially increasing the exergy demand. In contrast, monoliths decreased sorbent requirements with minimal exergy increase due to reduced mass transfer resistances and lower pressure drop associated with their thin walls. The analysis of volume requirement-specific exergy Pareto fronts revealed that PB<sub>5</sub> was less competitive with this metric due to the requirements for additional void space in the contactor configuration. The study also revealed that optimal sorbent loading for reducing volume requirements in monoliths differed from those minimizing sorbent usage, with the most effective loading being below 100%. Thus, the optimal contactor design varies depending on the goals of minimizing sorbent and volume requirements, and the choice and design of the contactor will depend on the relative costs of these factors. Lastly, our findings challenge the assumption that higher velocities are always preferable for direct air capture, suggesting instead that the operating velocity depends on the contactor configuration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"volume\":\"63 45\",\"pages\":\"19728–19743 19728–19743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02303\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02303\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过温度-真空变速吸附(TVSA)工艺建模,对用于直接空气捕集(DAC)的填料床和整体接触器配置进行了全面比较。我们研究了各种设计参数,以优化不同接触器几何结构的性能,包括颗粒尺寸、单体壁厚、单体中的活性吸附剂含量以及填料床结构配置,同时考虑了传统的长柱(PB40)和多个平行配置的短柱(PB5)。我们的参数分析评估了五步 TVSA 循环中不同运行条件下的具体能耗、吸附剂和体积要求。为了最大限度地减少吸附剂需求,PB5 和吸附剂装填量超过 80% 的单体是性能最好的接触器设计,在低能耗区域性能重叠。在这一区域之外,PB5 在进一步减少吸附剂需求方面面临限制,并且受到最大运行速度的制约,而在这一速度下运行不会大幅增加热能需求。相比之下,整体式吸附器由于其薄壁减少了传质阻力并降低了压降,因此在减少吸附剂需求量的同时,能耗增加极少。对特定于体积需求的放能帕累托前沿进行分析后发现,由于需要在接触器配置中增加空隙空间,PB5 在这一指标上的竞争力较弱。研究还显示,减少单体体积要求的最佳吸附剂装载量与吸附剂用量最小化的吸附剂装载量不同,最有效的装载量低于 100%。因此,最佳的接触器设计取决于最大限度减少吸附剂和体积需求的目标,而接触器的选择和设计将取决于这些因素的相对成本。最后,我们的研究结果对 "直接捕集空气的速度越高越好 "这一假设提出了质疑,表明操作速度取决于接触器的配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Geometric Properties and Cycle Design in Packed Bed and Monolith Contactors Using Temperature-Vacuum Swing Adsorption Modeling for Direct Air Capture

This study presents a comprehensive comparison between the packed bed and monolith contactor configurations for direct air capture (DAC) via process modeling of a temperature-vacuum swing adsorption (TVSA) process. We investigate various design parameters to optimize performance across different contactor geometries, including pellet size, monolith wall thickness, active sorbent content in monoliths, and packed bed structure configurations, considering both a traditional long column (PB40) and multiple shorter columns configured in parallel (PB5). Our parametric analysis assesses specific exergy consumption, sorbent, and volume requirements across different operating conditions of a five-step TVSA cycle. For minimizing sorbent requirements, PB5 and monoliths with over 80% sorbent loading were the best-performing contactor designs with overlapping performance in the low-exergy region. Beyond this region, PB5 faced limitations in reducing sorbent requirements further and was constrained by a maximum velocity at which it is sensible to operate without substantially increasing the exergy demand. In contrast, monoliths decreased sorbent requirements with minimal exergy increase due to reduced mass transfer resistances and lower pressure drop associated with their thin walls. The analysis of volume requirement-specific exergy Pareto fronts revealed that PB5 was less competitive with this metric due to the requirements for additional void space in the contactor configuration. The study also revealed that optimal sorbent loading for reducing volume requirements in monoliths differed from those minimizing sorbent usage, with the most effective loading being below 100%. Thus, the optimal contactor design varies depending on the goals of minimizing sorbent and volume requirements, and the choice and design of the contactor will depend on the relative costs of these factors. Lastly, our findings challenge the assumption that higher velocities are always preferable for direct air capture, suggesting instead that the operating velocity depends on the contactor configuration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信