锥形束计算机断层扫描中的金属伪影对计算机辅助种植手术静态和动态种植体植入准确性的影响:体外研究

Chunxu Liu, Shahida Mohd-Said, Xin-Fang Leong, In Meei Tew
{"title":"锥形束计算机断层扫描中的金属伪影对计算机辅助种植手术静态和动态种植体植入准确性的影响:体外研究","authors":"Chunxu Liu, Shahida Mohd-Said, Xin-Fang Leong, In Meei Tew","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of metal artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the accuracy of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An implant was placed on each of thirty 3D-printed models embedded with Cobalt-Chrome strips to simulate metal artifacts by Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM), utilizing these CAIS techniques: radiographic template (RT) (n=10), radiographic markers (RM) (n=10), and dynamic navigation (DN) (n=10). Trueness and precision were analyzed by comparing 3D global deviation and the difference in implant positions at the neck, apex, depth, and angle in initial planned and final placed scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DN exhibited significantly lower 3D global trueness deviation to RT (p = 0.022) and lower angular deviation compared to both RT (p = 0.003) and RM (p = 0.002). RM showed greater trueness at the implant neck compared to DN (p = 0.005) and better depth trueness than RT (p = 0.001) and DN (p = 0.027). DN demonstrated higher precision in implant angulation than RM (p = 0.011) and RT (p = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the presence of metal artifacts, both DN and RM techniques offered greater trueness in specific implant positions compared to RT. However, DN proved to be the most precise method for implant placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Metal Artifacts in Cone-beam Computed Tomography on Accuracy of Implant Placement by Static and Dynamic Computer- Assisted Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Chunxu Liu, Shahida Mohd-Said, Xin-Fang Leong, In Meei Tew\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.11183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of metal artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the accuracy of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An implant was placed on each of thirty 3D-printed models embedded with Cobalt-Chrome strips to simulate metal artifacts by Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM), utilizing these CAIS techniques: radiographic template (RT) (n=10), radiographic markers (RM) (n=10), and dynamic navigation (DN) (n=10). Trueness and precision were analyzed by comparing 3D global deviation and the difference in implant positions at the neck, apex, depth, and angle in initial planned and final placed scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DN exhibited significantly lower 3D global trueness deviation to RT (p = 0.022) and lower angular deviation compared to both RT (p = 0.003) and RM (p = 0.002). RM showed greater trueness at the implant neck compared to DN (p = 0.005) and better depth trueness than RT (p = 0.001) and DN (p = 0.027). DN demonstrated higher precision in implant angulation than RM (p = 0.011) and RT (p = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the presence of metal artifacts, both DN and RM techniques offered greater trueness in specific implant positions compared to RT. However, DN proved to be the most precise method for implant placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中的金属伪影对静态和动态计算机辅助种植手术(CAIS)技术准确性的影响:利用以下计算机辅助种植手术(CAIS)技术,在嵌入钴铬合金条的30个三维打印模型上各植入一个种植体,以模拟瓷熔金属(PFM)的金属伪影:放射模板(RT)(n=10)、放射标记(RM)(n=10)和动态导航(DN)(n=10)。通过比较三维全局偏差以及初始计划扫描和最终植入扫描中种植体颈部、顶点、深度和角度位置的差异,对真实度和精确度进行分析:与RT(p = 0.003)和RM(p = 0.002)相比,DN的三维全局偏差明显低于RT(p = 0.022),角度偏差也低于RT(p = 0.003)。与 DN 相比,RM 显示出更高的种植体颈部真实度(p = 0.005),与 RT(p = 0.001)和 DN(p = 0.027)相比,RM 显示出更好的深度真实度。与RM(p = 0.011)和RT(p = 0.041)相比,DN显示出更高的种植体角度精度:结论:在存在金属伪影的情况下,与 RT 相比,DN 和 RM 技术在特定种植体位置的精确度更高。然而,事实证明 DN 是最精确的种植体植入方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Metal Artifacts in Cone-beam Computed Tomography on Accuracy of Implant Placement by Static and Dynamic Computer- Assisted Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.

Purpose: This study evaluates the impact of metal artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the accuracy of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) techniques.

Materials and methods: An implant was placed on each of thirty 3D-printed models embedded with Cobalt-Chrome strips to simulate metal artifacts by Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM), utilizing these CAIS techniques: radiographic template (RT) (n=10), radiographic markers (RM) (n=10), and dynamic navigation (DN) (n=10). Trueness and precision were analyzed by comparing 3D global deviation and the difference in implant positions at the neck, apex, depth, and angle in initial planned and final placed scans.

Results: DN exhibited significantly lower 3D global trueness deviation to RT (p = 0.022) and lower angular deviation compared to both RT (p = 0.003) and RM (p = 0.002). RM showed greater trueness at the implant neck compared to DN (p = 0.005) and better depth trueness than RT (p = 0.001) and DN (p = 0.027). DN demonstrated higher precision in implant angulation than RM (p = 0.011) and RT (p = 0.041).

Conclusion: In the presence of metal artifacts, both DN and RM techniques offered greater trueness in specific implant positions compared to RT. However, DN proved to be the most precise method for implant placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信