修正 PISA 方法以量化继发性三尖瓣反流与疗效的关系

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michele Tomaselli, Marco Penso, Luigi P Badano, Alexandra Clement, Noela Radu, Francesca Heilbron, Mara Gavazzoni, Diana R Hădăreanu, Giorgio Oliverio, Samantha Fisicaro, Paolo Springhetti, Cinzia Pece, Caterina Delcea, Denisa Muraru
{"title":"修正 PISA 方法以量化继发性三尖瓣反流与疗效的关系","authors":"Michele Tomaselli, Marco Penso, Luigi P Badano, Alexandra Clement, Noela Radu, Francesca Heilbron, Mara Gavazzoni, Diana R Hădăreanu, Giorgio Oliverio, Samantha Fisicaro, Paolo Springhetti, Cinzia Pece, Caterina Delcea, Denisa Muraru","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the correction of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been shown to improve the accuracy of assessing the severity of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR), its clinical impact remains to be investigated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the association of the quantitative parameters of STR severity obtained from the corrected and conventional PISA methods with the outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured both conventional and corrected effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA vs. corrected EROA (EROAc)], regurgitant volume [RegVol vs. corrected RegVol (RegVolc)], and regurgitant fraction [RegFr vs. corrected RegFr (RegFrc)] in 519 consecutive patients (75±12 years, 44% men, 74% ventricular) with moderate and severe STR. The endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EROAc, RegVolc, and RegFrc were significantly larger than EROA, RegVol, and RegFr (P < 0.001 for all). After a follow-up of 19±15 months, 210 patients reached the endpoint. Using time-dependent ROC curves, the parameters obtained from the corrected PISA were more closely associated with outcomes at two years than those obtained with the conventional PISA: EROAc vs. EROA (p<0.001), RegVolc vs. RegVol (p=0.001), and RegFrc vs. RegFr (p<0.001) in ventricular STR. Conversely no significant differences were detected in atrial STR. After multivariable adjustment, both uncorrected and corrected EROA, RegVol, and RegFr were independently associated with the endpoint. Using the new 5-grade severity scheme, patients reclassified by corrected PISA method had a significantly higher rate of events compared to those not reclassified in with V-STR (p = 0.0086). Conversely, this relationship was not statistically significant in patients with atrial STR (p = 0.061) CONCLUSIONS: Correcting the PISA method provides larger quantitative parameters of STR severity that are more closely associated with outcomes in patients with ventricular STR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association with Outcomes of Correcting the PISA Method to Quantitate Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Tomaselli, Marco Penso, Luigi P Badano, Alexandra Clement, Noela Radu, Francesca Heilbron, Mara Gavazzoni, Diana R Hădăreanu, Giorgio Oliverio, Samantha Fisicaro, Paolo Springhetti, Cinzia Pece, Caterina Delcea, Denisa Muraru\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.echo.2024.10.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the correction of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been shown to improve the accuracy of assessing the severity of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR), its clinical impact remains to be investigated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the association of the quantitative parameters of STR severity obtained from the corrected and conventional PISA methods with the outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured both conventional and corrected effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA vs. corrected EROA (EROAc)], regurgitant volume [RegVol vs. corrected RegVol (RegVolc)], and regurgitant fraction [RegFr vs. corrected RegFr (RegFrc)] in 519 consecutive patients (75±12 years, 44% men, 74% ventricular) with moderate and severe STR. The endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EROAc, RegVolc, and RegFrc were significantly larger than EROA, RegVol, and RegFr (P < 0.001 for all). After a follow-up of 19±15 months, 210 patients reached the endpoint. Using time-dependent ROC curves, the parameters obtained from the corrected PISA were more closely associated with outcomes at two years than those obtained with the conventional PISA: EROAc vs. EROA (p<0.001), RegVolc vs. RegVol (p=0.001), and RegFrc vs. RegFr (p<0.001) in ventricular STR. Conversely no significant differences were detected in atrial STR. After multivariable adjustment, both uncorrected and corrected EROA, RegVol, and RegFr were independently associated with the endpoint. Using the new 5-grade severity scheme, patients reclassified by corrected PISA method had a significantly higher rate of events compared to those not reclassified in with V-STR (p = 0.0086). Conversely, this relationship was not statistically significant in patients with atrial STR (p = 0.061) CONCLUSIONS: Correcting the PISA method provides larger quantitative parameters of STR severity that are more closely associated with outcomes in patients with ventricular STR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2024.10.015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2024.10.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管近端等速表面积(PISA)校正法已被证明可提高评估继发性三尖瓣反流(STR)严重程度的准确性,但其临床影响仍有待研究:目的:比较修正和传统 PISA 方法获得的 STR 严重程度定量参数与预后的相关性:我们测量了连续519例中度和重度STR患者(75±12岁,44%为男性,74%为心室患者)的常规和校正有效反流孔面积[EROA vs. corrected EROA (EROAc)]、反流容积[RegVol vs. corrected RegVol (RegVolc)]和反流分数[RegFr vs. corrected RegFr (RegFrc)]。终点是心衰住院和死亡的综合结果:结果:EROAc、RegVolc 和 RegFrc 均明显大于EROA、RegVol 和 RegFr(P 均<0.001)。经过 19±15 个月的随访,210 名患者达到终点。利用时间依赖性 ROC 曲线,与传统 PISA 相比,校正 PISA 得出的参数与两年后的结果更密切相关:EROAc与EROA相比(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association with Outcomes of Correcting the PISA Method to Quantitate Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Background: Although the correction of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been shown to improve the accuracy of assessing the severity of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR), its clinical impact remains to be investigated.

Objectives: To compare the association of the quantitative parameters of STR severity obtained from the corrected and conventional PISA methods with the outcome.

Methods: We measured both conventional and corrected effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA vs. corrected EROA (EROAc)], regurgitant volume [RegVol vs. corrected RegVol (RegVolc)], and regurgitant fraction [RegFr vs. corrected RegFr (RegFrc)] in 519 consecutive patients (75±12 years, 44% men, 74% ventricular) with moderate and severe STR. The endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization and death.

Results: EROAc, RegVolc, and RegFrc were significantly larger than EROA, RegVol, and RegFr (P < 0.001 for all). After a follow-up of 19±15 months, 210 patients reached the endpoint. Using time-dependent ROC curves, the parameters obtained from the corrected PISA were more closely associated with outcomes at two years than those obtained with the conventional PISA: EROAc vs. EROA (p<0.001), RegVolc vs. RegVol (p=0.001), and RegFrc vs. RegFr (p<0.001) in ventricular STR. Conversely no significant differences were detected in atrial STR. After multivariable adjustment, both uncorrected and corrected EROA, RegVol, and RegFr were independently associated with the endpoint. Using the new 5-grade severity scheme, patients reclassified by corrected PISA method had a significantly higher rate of events compared to those not reclassified in with V-STR (p = 0.0086). Conversely, this relationship was not statistically significant in patients with atrial STR (p = 0.061) CONCLUSIONS: Correcting the PISA method provides larger quantitative parameters of STR severity that are more closely associated with outcomes in patients with ventricular STR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
12.30%
发文量
257
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信