以歌唱为基础的疗法对帕金森病患者嗓音效果的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Abdulsalam Alqutub, Abdulrahman Alqutub, Ahmed M Mogharbel, Mohammed A Awadh, Salam Sait, Abdulrahman S Aldharrab, Faisal H Zagzoog
{"title":"以歌唱为基础的疗法对帕金森病患者嗓音效果的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Abdulsalam Alqutub, Abdulrahman Alqutub, Ahmed M Mogharbel, Mohammed A Awadh, Salam Sait, Abdulrahman S Aldharrab, Faisal H Zagzoog","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communication impairments significantly impact the quality of life for individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), underscoring the need for effective interventions. Singing, by engaging shared neural networks and structural mechanisms involved in speech production, holds therapeutic potential for addressing speech disorders in this population. This study explores the effects of singing-based therapeutic intervention on voice in patients diagnosed with PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched four electronic databases to find relevant studies. Data extraction and analysis involved calculating mean differences (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for pre- and post-singing interventions, including their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was evaluated with a P-value threshold >0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis included 21 studies, encompassing 449 patients. Singing showed no significant effect on speaking fundamental frequency (MD 2.98, 95% CI: -6.79, 12.75, P = 0.55), jitter (MD -0.13, 95% CI: -0.47, 0.22, P = 0.47), shimmer (MD -0.71, 95% CI: -1.68, 0.26, P = 0.15), or health-related quality-of-life outcomes: Voice Handicap Index (MD -4.60, 95% CI: -9.29, 0.09, P = 0.05) and Voice-Related Quality of Life (SMD 0.08, 95% CI: -0.28, 0.44, P = 0.65). However, singing significantly improved vocal frequency range (MD 2.60, 95% CI: 1.17, 4.03, P = 0.0004), maximum expiratory pressure (MD 14.26, 95% CI: 9.57, 18.96, P < 0.00001), maximum inspiratory pressure (MD 6.22, 95% CI: 2.96, 9.48, P = 0.0002), and maximum phonation time (MD 1.83, 95% CI: 0.73, 2.92, P = 0.001). Vocal intensity showed no significant difference (MD 1.09, 95% CI: -0.71, 2.88, P = 0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that singing interventions positively affect vocal frequency range and respiratory outcomes. However, significant changes were not observed in other speech metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Singing-Based Therapy on Voice Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulsalam Alqutub, Abdulrahman Alqutub, Ahmed M Mogharbel, Mohammed A Awadh, Salam Sait, Abdulrahman S Aldharrab, Faisal H Zagzoog\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communication impairments significantly impact the quality of life for individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), underscoring the need for effective interventions. Singing, by engaging shared neural networks and structural mechanisms involved in speech production, holds therapeutic potential for addressing speech disorders in this population. This study explores the effects of singing-based therapeutic intervention on voice in patients diagnosed with PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched four electronic databases to find relevant studies. Data extraction and analysis involved calculating mean differences (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for pre- and post-singing interventions, including their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was evaluated with a P-value threshold >0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis included 21 studies, encompassing 449 patients. Singing showed no significant effect on speaking fundamental frequency (MD 2.98, 95% CI: -6.79, 12.75, P = 0.55), jitter (MD -0.13, 95% CI: -0.47, 0.22, P = 0.47), shimmer (MD -0.71, 95% CI: -1.68, 0.26, P = 0.15), or health-related quality-of-life outcomes: Voice Handicap Index (MD -4.60, 95% CI: -9.29, 0.09, P = 0.05) and Voice-Related Quality of Life (SMD 0.08, 95% CI: -0.28, 0.44, P = 0.65). However, singing significantly improved vocal frequency range (MD 2.60, 95% CI: 1.17, 4.03, P = 0.0004), maximum expiratory pressure (MD 14.26, 95% CI: 9.57, 18.96, P < 0.00001), maximum inspiratory pressure (MD 6.22, 95% CI: 2.96, 9.48, P = 0.0002), and maximum phonation time (MD 1.83, 95% CI: 0.73, 2.92, P = 0.001). Vocal intensity showed no significant difference (MD 1.09, 95% CI: -0.71, 2.88, P = 0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that singing interventions positively affect vocal frequency range and respiratory outcomes. However, significant changes were not observed in other speech metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:交流障碍严重影响帕金森病(PD)患者的生活质量,因此需要采取有效的干预措施。唱歌可以调动语言生成过程中的共同神经网络和结构机制,具有治疗帕金森病患者语言障碍的潜力。本研究探讨了基于歌唱的治疗干预对被诊断为帕金森氏症患者嗓音的影响:我们系统地搜索了四个电子数据库,以找到相关研究。数据提取和分析包括计算歌唱干预前后的平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD),包括其 95% 置信区间(CI)。统计显著性以 P 值大于 0.05 为临界值:我们的系统回顾和荟萃分析包括 21 项研究,涉及 449 名患者。唱歌对说话基频(MD 2.98,95% CI:-6.79,12.75,P = 0.55)、抖动(MD -0.13,95% CI:-0.47,0.22,P = 0.47)、颤音(MD -0.71,95% CI:-1.68,0.26,P = 0.15)或与健康相关的生活质量结果均无明显影响:嗓音障碍指数(MD -4.60,95% CI:-9.29,0.09,P = 0.05)和嗓音相关生活质量(SMD 0.08,95% CI:-0.28,0.44,P = 0.65)。然而,唱歌能明显改善声频范围(MD 2.60,95% CI:1.17, 4.03,P = 0.0004)、最大呼气压力(MD 14.26,95% CI:9.57, 18.96,P 结论:我们的研究发现,唱歌干预能积极改善嗓音相关生活质量(SMD 0.08,95% CI:-0.28, 0.44,P = 0.65):我们的研究发现,歌唱干预对发声频率范围和呼吸效果有积极影响。然而,在其他语言指标方面并未观察到明显变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Singing-Based Therapy on Voice Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Communication impairments significantly impact the quality of life for individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), underscoring the need for effective interventions. Singing, by engaging shared neural networks and structural mechanisms involved in speech production, holds therapeutic potential for addressing speech disorders in this population. This study explores the effects of singing-based therapeutic intervention on voice in patients diagnosed with PD.

Methods: We systematically searched four electronic databases to find relevant studies. Data extraction and analysis involved calculating mean differences (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for pre- and post-singing interventions, including their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was evaluated with a P-value threshold >0.05.

Results: Our systematic review and meta-analysis included 21 studies, encompassing 449 patients. Singing showed no significant effect on speaking fundamental frequency (MD 2.98, 95% CI: -6.79, 12.75, P = 0.55), jitter (MD -0.13, 95% CI: -0.47, 0.22, P = 0.47), shimmer (MD -0.71, 95% CI: -1.68, 0.26, P = 0.15), or health-related quality-of-life outcomes: Voice Handicap Index (MD -4.60, 95% CI: -9.29, 0.09, P = 0.05) and Voice-Related Quality of Life (SMD 0.08, 95% CI: -0.28, 0.44, P = 0.65). However, singing significantly improved vocal frequency range (MD 2.60, 95% CI: 1.17, 4.03, P = 0.0004), maximum expiratory pressure (MD 14.26, 95% CI: 9.57, 18.96, P < 0.00001), maximum inspiratory pressure (MD 6.22, 95% CI: 2.96, 9.48, P = 0.0002), and maximum phonation time (MD 1.83, 95% CI: 0.73, 2.92, P = 0.001). Vocal intensity showed no significant difference (MD 1.09, 95% CI: -0.71, 2.88, P = 0.24).

Conclusion: Our study found that singing interventions positively affect vocal frequency range and respiratory outcomes. However, significant changes were not observed in other speech metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信