Errate:一项针对 290 例可切除良性和恶性胃肿瘤患者的回顾性研究,旨在比较使用弹簧圈夹(S-O 夹)和不使用内牵引法进行内镜下切除术的术后效果。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada
{"title":"Errate:一项针对 290 例可切除良性和恶性胃肿瘤患者的回顾性研究,旨在比较使用弹簧圈夹(S-O 夹)和不使用内牵引法进行内镜下切除术的术后效果。","authors":"Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada","doi":"10.12659/MSM.947217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors have identified an error in Table 5 concerning the dissection speed. It is currently listed as follows: S-O group 14.5±9.5 and Control group 25.1±18.9. However, this is incorrect. The correct values should be reversed: S-O group 25.1±18.9 and Control group 14.5±9.5.References:Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip). Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e947217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Errate: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip).\",\"authors\":\"Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.947217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors have identified an error in Table 5 concerning the dissection speed. It is currently listed as follows: S-O group 14.5±9.5 and Control group 25.1±18.9. However, this is incorrect. The correct values should be reversed: S-O group 25.1±18.9 and Control group 14.5±9.5.References:Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip). Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e947217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.947217\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.947217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者在表 5 中发现了一处关于解剖速度的错误。目前表列如下S-O 组为 14.5±9.5,对照组为 25.1±18.9。然而,这是不正确的。正确的数值应为:S-O 组 25.1±18.9,对照组 14.5±9.5。参考文献:Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada:290 例可切除良性和恶性胃肿瘤患者的回顾性研究:比较使用弹簧圈夹(S-O 夹)和不使用内牵引法进行内镜下切除术的术后效果。Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341.DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Errate: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip).

The authors have identified an error in Table 5 concerning the dissection speed. It is currently listed as follows: S-O group 14.5±9.5 and Control group 25.1±18.9. However, this is incorrect. The correct values should be reversed: S-O group 25.1±18.9 and Control group 14.5±9.5.References:Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip). Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信