使用客观、综合、集群考试软件(VOICES)应用程序进行口头测验:对医学本科生进行生理学形成性评估的研究。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
A K Somasekhar, Arunita Tushar Jagzape, Meenakshi Sinha, Ramanjan Sinha
{"title":"使用客观、综合、集群考试软件(VOICES)应用程序进行口头测验:对医学本科生进行生理学形成性评估的研究。","authors":"A K Somasekhar, Arunita Tushar Jagzape, Meenakshi Sinha, Ramanjan Sinha","doi":"10.1152/advan.00078.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The significance of assessment in driving learning is undeniable, particularly in oral assessments like viva voce where students express themselves verbally. However, traditional viva voce examinations' challenges include reliability, objectivity, content validity, time constraints, varying question difficulty levels, inconsistency in questioning among students, the influence of the \"halo\" effect, and issues with the test environment. Thus the study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Objective, Integrated, Clustered Examination Software (VOICES) compared to traditional viva voce methods. Using a mixed-method design with 103 students, questions were framed using VOICES software created by the National Informatics Center (NIC), Chhattisgarh State Center, Government of India, and students responded through voice messages. Faculty graded students based on personalized videos created by the app. Then, feedback was given, and a focused group discussion was conducted for the students. Traditional viva voce examinations were conducted as part of internal assessments, and the marks obtained from these assessments were compared to evaluate their effectiveness in comparison to the VOICES app. There was no significant difference in the marks obtained using both methods indicating that viva voce using an oral assessment app is equally effective. Students responded positively to the VOICES method. The formative oral assessment conducted through the use of the VOICES app successfully addresses the challenges typically associated with traditional viva voce examinations.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Traditional viva voce examination encounters challenges including reliability, objectivity, content validity, time constraints, varying question difficulty levels, inconsistency in questioning among students, the influence of the \"halo\" effect, and issues with the test environment. Formative oral assessment conducted through the use of the Objective, Integrated, Clustered Examination Software (VOICES) app developed by the National Informatics Center (NIC) successfully addresses the challenges typically associated with traditional viva voce examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":"48 4","pages":"915-922"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viva voce using Objective, Integrated, Clustered Examination Software (VOICES) app: study for formative assessment of medical undergraduate students in physiology.\",\"authors\":\"A K Somasekhar, Arunita Tushar Jagzape, Meenakshi Sinha, Ramanjan Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00078.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The significance of assessment in driving learning is undeniable, particularly in oral assessments like viva voce where students express themselves verbally. However, traditional viva voce examinations' challenges include reliability, objectivity, content validity, time constraints, varying question difficulty levels, inconsistency in questioning among students, the influence of the \\\"halo\\\" effect, and issues with the test environment. Thus the study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Objective, Integrated, Clustered Examination Software (VOICES) compared to traditional viva voce methods. Using a mixed-method design with 103 students, questions were framed using VOICES software created by the National Informatics Center (NIC), Chhattisgarh State Center, Government of India, and students responded through voice messages. Faculty graded students based on personalized videos created by the app. Then, feedback was given, and a focused group discussion was conducted for the students. Traditional viva voce examinations were conducted as part of internal assessments, and the marks obtained from these assessments were compared to evaluate their effectiveness in comparison to the VOICES app. There was no significant difference in the marks obtained using both methods indicating that viva voce using an oral assessment app is equally effective. Students responded positively to the VOICES method. The formative oral assessment conducted through the use of the VOICES app successfully addresses the challenges typically associated with traditional viva voce examinations.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Traditional viva voce examination encounters challenges including reliability, objectivity, content validity, time constraints, varying question difficulty levels, inconsistency in questioning among students, the influence of the \\\"halo\\\" effect, and issues with the test environment. Formative oral assessment conducted through the use of the Objective, Integrated, Clustered Examination Software (VOICES) app developed by the National Informatics Center (NIC) successfully addresses the challenges typically associated with traditional viva voce examinations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"915-922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00078.2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00078.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估对学习的推动作用是毋庸置疑的,尤其是像口头考试这样学生以口头形式表达自己的口头评估。然而,传统的口头考试所面临的挑战包括可靠性、客观性、内容有效性、时间限制、问题难度不同、学生提问不一致、"光环 "效应的影响以及考试环境等问题。因此,本研究旨在评估客观、综合、集群考试软件(VOICES)与传统口头考试方法相比的有效性。该研究采用混合方法设计,共有 103 名学生参加,使用印度政府恰蒂斯加尔邦中心国家信息学中心(NIC)开发的 VOICES 软件提出问题,学生通过语音信息进行回答。教师根据应用程序创建的个性化视频对学生进行评分。然后,教师给出反馈意见,并为学生开展小组集中讨论。作为内部评估的一部分,进行了传统的口头考试,并比较了这些评估所获得的分数,以评估其与 VOICES 应用程序的效果。两种方法所获得的分数没有明显差异,这表明使用口语评估应用程序进行口头考试同样有效。学生对 VOICES 方法反应积极。通过使用 VOICES 应用程序进行的形成性口语测评成功地解决了传统口头考试通常面临的挑战。传统口头考试面临的挑战包括可靠性、客观性、内容有效性、时间限制、问题难度不同、学生提问不一致、"光环 "效应的影响以及考试环境问题。通过使用由美国国家信息学中心(NIC)开发的客观、综合、集群考试软件(VOICES)应用程序进行形成性口语评估,成功地解决了传统口头考试通常面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viva voce using Objective, Integrated, Clustered Examination Software (VOICES) app: study for formative assessment of medical undergraduate students in physiology.

The significance of assessment in driving learning is undeniable, particularly in oral assessments like viva voce where students express themselves verbally. However, traditional viva voce examinations' challenges include reliability, objectivity, content validity, time constraints, varying question difficulty levels, inconsistency in questioning among students, the influence of the "halo" effect, and issues with the test environment. Thus the study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Objective, Integrated, Clustered Examination Software (VOICES) compared to traditional viva voce methods. Using a mixed-method design with 103 students, questions were framed using VOICES software created by the National Informatics Center (NIC), Chhattisgarh State Center, Government of India, and students responded through voice messages. Faculty graded students based on personalized videos created by the app. Then, feedback was given, and a focused group discussion was conducted for the students. Traditional viva voce examinations were conducted as part of internal assessments, and the marks obtained from these assessments were compared to evaluate their effectiveness in comparison to the VOICES app. There was no significant difference in the marks obtained using both methods indicating that viva voce using an oral assessment app is equally effective. Students responded positively to the VOICES method. The formative oral assessment conducted through the use of the VOICES app successfully addresses the challenges typically associated with traditional viva voce examinations.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Traditional viva voce examination encounters challenges including reliability, objectivity, content validity, time constraints, varying question difficulty levels, inconsistency in questioning among students, the influence of the "halo" effect, and issues with the test environment. Formative oral assessment conducted through the use of the Objective, Integrated, Clustered Examination Software (VOICES) app developed by the National Informatics Center (NIC) successfully addresses the challenges typically associated with traditional viva voce examinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信