用超声波测量视神经鞘直径对创伤性脑损伤患者颅内高压进行无创评估的诊断准确性:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maria José Uparela-Reyes, Sebastian Ordoñez-Cure, Johana Moreno-Drada, Lina María Villegas-Trujillo, Oscar Andrés Escobar-Vidarte
{"title":"用超声波测量视神经鞘直径对创伤性脑损伤患者颅内高压进行无创评估的诊断准确性:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Maria José Uparela-Reyes, Sebastian Ordoñez-Cure, Johana Moreno-Drada, Lina María Villegas-Trujillo, Oscar Andrés Escobar-Vidarte","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Intracranial hypertension (IH) is associated with an unfavorable outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI), and management strategies guided by intracranial pressure monitoring improve prognosis. Owing to the limitations of using invasive devices, measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) by ultrasonography is an alternative noninvasive method. However, its accuracy has not been validated in patients with TBI, so we aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of measuring ONSD by ultrasonography in patients with TBI to estimate IH, compared with invasive monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review of electronic databases and manual literature review from inception to June 2023. The analysis included diagnostic accuracy studies of ultrasonographic measurement of ONSD compared with invasive monitoring published in any language and with patients of any age. A qualitative synthesis was performed describing the clinical and methodological characteristics, strengths, limitations, and quality of evidence. In addition, a bivariate random effects model meta-analysis and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model were performed for the pediatric and adult population separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and forty eight patients of 688 in 16 eligible studies were adults and 120 were children. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of ONSD measurement by ultrasonography were 84% (95% CI, 76%-89%) and 83% (95% CI, 73%-90%), respectively. During the sensitivity analysis, these parameters exhibited consistent values. Pooled area under the curve was 0.91 for adults and 0.76 for children. Optimal threshold for estimating IH was 5.76 mm for adults and 5.78 mm for children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurement of ONSD by ultrasonography is a reliable, low-cost, and safe alternative for the estimation of IH with TBI in adults. More robust studies are needed to overcome the high risk of bias and heterogeneity for this analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement by Ultrasonography for Noninvasive Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maria José Uparela-Reyes, Sebastian Ordoñez-Cure, Johana Moreno-Drada, Lina María Villegas-Trujillo, Oscar Andrés Escobar-Vidarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Intracranial hypertension (IH) is associated with an unfavorable outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI), and management strategies guided by intracranial pressure monitoring improve prognosis. Owing to the limitations of using invasive devices, measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) by ultrasonography is an alternative noninvasive method. However, its accuracy has not been validated in patients with TBI, so we aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of measuring ONSD by ultrasonography in patients with TBI to estimate IH, compared with invasive monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review of electronic databases and manual literature review from inception to June 2023. The analysis included diagnostic accuracy studies of ultrasonographic measurement of ONSD compared with invasive monitoring published in any language and with patients of any age. A qualitative synthesis was performed describing the clinical and methodological characteristics, strengths, limitations, and quality of evidence. In addition, a bivariate random effects model meta-analysis and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model were performed for the pediatric and adult population separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and forty eight patients of 688 in 16 eligible studies were adults and 120 were children. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of ONSD measurement by ultrasonography were 84% (95% CI, 76%-89%) and 83% (95% CI, 73%-90%), respectively. During the sensitivity analysis, these parameters exhibited consistent values. Pooled area under the curve was 0.91 for adults and 0.76 for children. Optimal threshold for estimating IH was 5.76 mm for adults and 5.78 mm for children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurement of ONSD by ultrasonography is a reliable, low-cost, and safe alternative for the estimation of IH with TBI in adults. More robust studies are needed to overcome the high risk of bias and heterogeneity for this analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003273\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:颅内高压(IH)与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的不良预后有关,通过颅内压监测指导的管理策略可改善预后。由于使用侵入性设备的局限性,通过超声波测量视神经鞘直径(ONSD)是一种替代性无创方法。然而,其准确性尚未在创伤性脑损伤患者中得到验证,因此我们旨在确定在创伤性脑损伤患者中通过超声波测量视神经鞘直径以估测 IH 的诊断准确性,并与有创监测进行比较:方法:对电子数据库进行系统回顾,并对从开始到 2023 年 6 月的文献进行人工回顾。分析包括以任何语言发表的、针对任何年龄段患者的超声波测量ONSD与有创监测相比的诊断准确性研究。研究人员对这些研究的临床和方法学特征、优势、局限性和证据质量进行了定性综合。此外,还针对儿童和成人人群分别进行了双变量随机效应模型荟萃分析和分层汇总接收者操作特征模型:在16项符合条件的研究中,688名患者中有548名是成人,120名是儿童。通过超声波检查测量 ONSD 的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 84%(95% CI,76%-89%)和 83%(95% CI,73%-90%)。在敏感性分析中,这些参数显示出一致的数值。成人和儿童的汇总曲线下面积分别为 0.91 和 0.76。成人估计 IH 的最佳阈值为 5.76 毫米,儿童为 5.78 毫米:结论:通过超声波测量 ONSD 是一种可靠、低成本且安全的替代方法,可用于估计成人 TBI IH。要克服该分析的高偏倚风险和异质性,还需要更多可靠的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement by Ultrasonography for Noninvasive Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and objectives: Intracranial hypertension (IH) is associated with an unfavorable outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI), and management strategies guided by intracranial pressure monitoring improve prognosis. Owing to the limitations of using invasive devices, measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) by ultrasonography is an alternative noninvasive method. However, its accuracy has not been validated in patients with TBI, so we aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of measuring ONSD by ultrasonography in patients with TBI to estimate IH, compared with invasive monitoring.

Methods: Systematic review of electronic databases and manual literature review from inception to June 2023. The analysis included diagnostic accuracy studies of ultrasonographic measurement of ONSD compared with invasive monitoring published in any language and with patients of any age. A qualitative synthesis was performed describing the clinical and methodological characteristics, strengths, limitations, and quality of evidence. In addition, a bivariate random effects model meta-analysis and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model were performed for the pediatric and adult population separately.

Results: Five hundred and forty eight patients of 688 in 16 eligible studies were adults and 120 were children. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of ONSD measurement by ultrasonography were 84% (95% CI, 76%-89%) and 83% (95% CI, 73%-90%), respectively. During the sensitivity analysis, these parameters exhibited consistent values. Pooled area under the curve was 0.91 for adults and 0.76 for children. Optimal threshold for estimating IH was 5.76 mm for adults and 5.78 mm for children.

Conclusion: Measurement of ONSD by ultrasonography is a reliable, low-cost, and safe alternative for the estimation of IH with TBI in adults. More robust studies are needed to overcome the high risk of bias and heterogeneity for this analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信