[瑞士非住院治疗质量指标:老年人在初级保健中使用多药治疗的潜在药物相互作用]。

Q4 Medicine
Praxis Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.08.004
Rahel Meienberger, Andreas Zeller
{"title":"[瑞士非住院治疗质量指标:老年人在初级保健中使用多药治疗的潜在药物相互作用]。","authors":"Rahel Meienberger, Andreas Zeller","doi":"10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Background The Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine (SGAIM) has chosen the topic \"Recognising drug interactions and preventing side effects\" as a quality indicator in the primary care setting. Methodology Retrospectively, in a group practice of 6 general practitioners (GPs), all patients aged 65 and over who were prescribed ≥ 5 long-term medications were identified in the year 2022. These medications were systematically checked for interaction reports using the Compendium® software. Results The 226 patients were on average 77 years old and took an average of 7 different medications. In 188 (83.2 %) individuals with drug interaction signals, the severity of the drug interaction was classified as mild in 164 (87.3 %), moderate in 21 (11.1 %) and severe in 3 (1.6 %). Diuretics, antidiabetics and ACE-inhibitors/sartans were most frequently involved. In case of severe drug interaction reports, antidepressant agents and amiodarone were most frequently involved. In the multivariate analysis, no statistically significant associations were identified between the number of drug interaction reports and age, gender or type of residence. Conclusion In over 65-year-olds with polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications) in a GP setting, a software-supported systematic drug interaction check identified drug interactions of the prescribed medication in nine out of ten patients. The vast majority of drug interaction reports were minor and not clinically relevant. The number of drug interactions as an indicator of quality of care is limited, as patient-specific information other than their medication regimens is not taken into account. GPs' classification in the clinical context and the context and the assessment of the benefits and risks of (poly-)medication is indispensable.</p>","PeriodicalId":20494,"journal":{"name":"Praxis","volume":"113 8","pages":"195-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[An Indicator of Treatment Quality in Ambulatory Care in Switzerland: Potential drug interaction in older people with polpharmacy in primary care].\",\"authors\":\"Rahel Meienberger, Andreas Zeller\",\"doi\":\"10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Background The Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine (SGAIM) has chosen the topic \\\"Recognising drug interactions and preventing side effects\\\" as a quality indicator in the primary care setting. Methodology Retrospectively, in a group practice of 6 general practitioners (GPs), all patients aged 65 and over who were prescribed ≥ 5 long-term medications were identified in the year 2022. These medications were systematically checked for interaction reports using the Compendium® software. Results The 226 patients were on average 77 years old and took an average of 7 different medications. In 188 (83.2 %) individuals with drug interaction signals, the severity of the drug interaction was classified as mild in 164 (87.3 %), moderate in 21 (11.1 %) and severe in 3 (1.6 %). Diuretics, antidiabetics and ACE-inhibitors/sartans were most frequently involved. In case of severe drug interaction reports, antidepressant agents and amiodarone were most frequently involved. In the multivariate analysis, no statistically significant associations were identified between the number of drug interaction reports and age, gender or type of residence. Conclusion In over 65-year-olds with polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications) in a GP setting, a software-supported systematic drug interaction check identified drug interactions of the prescribed medication in nine out of ten patients. The vast majority of drug interaction reports were minor and not clinically relevant. The number of drug interactions as an indicator of quality of care is limited, as patient-specific information other than their medication regimens is not taken into account. GPs' classification in the clinical context and the context and the assessment of the benefits and risks of (poly-)medication is indispensable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praxis\",\"volume\":\"113 8\",\"pages\":\"195-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:背景 瑞士普通内科医学会(SGAIM)选择了 "识别药物相互作用和预防副作用 "作为初级医疗机构的质量指标。方法 回顾性地在一个由 6 名全科医生(GPs)组成的团体诊所中,对 2022 年所有 65 岁及以上、处方≥ 5 种长期药物的患者进行识别。使用 Compendium® 软件对这些药物的相互作用报告进行了系统检查。结果 226 名患者平均年龄 77 岁,平均服用 7 种不同的药物。在出现药物相互作用信号的 188 人(83.2%)中,164 人(87.3%)的药物相互作用严重程度被归类为轻度,21 人(11.1%)为中度,3 人(1.6%)为重度。最常涉及的药物是利尿剂、抗糖尿病药和 ACE 抑制剂/沙坦类药物。在严重的药物相互作用报告中,最常涉及的是抗抑郁药和胺碘酮。在多变量分析中,没有发现药物相互作用报告的数量与年龄、性别或居住地类型之间有明显的统计学关联。结论 在全科医生处就诊的 65 岁以上多药(≥ 5 种药物)患者中,通过软件支持的系统性药物相互作用检查,十名患者中有九名发现了处方药的药物相互作用。绝大多数药物相互作用报告都很轻微,与临床无关。药物相互作用的数量作为衡量医疗质量的指标是有限的,因为除用药方案外,患者的其他特定信息并未考虑在内。全科医生根据临床情况和背景对(多种)药物的益处和风险进行分类和评估是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[An Indicator of Treatment Quality in Ambulatory Care in Switzerland: Potential drug interaction in older people with polpharmacy in primary care].

Introduction: Background The Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine (SGAIM) has chosen the topic "Recognising drug interactions and preventing side effects" as a quality indicator in the primary care setting. Methodology Retrospectively, in a group practice of 6 general practitioners (GPs), all patients aged 65 and over who were prescribed ≥ 5 long-term medications were identified in the year 2022. These medications were systematically checked for interaction reports using the Compendium® software. Results The 226 patients were on average 77 years old and took an average of 7 different medications. In 188 (83.2 %) individuals with drug interaction signals, the severity of the drug interaction was classified as mild in 164 (87.3 %), moderate in 21 (11.1 %) and severe in 3 (1.6 %). Diuretics, antidiabetics and ACE-inhibitors/sartans were most frequently involved. In case of severe drug interaction reports, antidepressant agents and amiodarone were most frequently involved. In the multivariate analysis, no statistically significant associations were identified between the number of drug interaction reports and age, gender or type of residence. Conclusion In over 65-year-olds with polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications) in a GP setting, a software-supported systematic drug interaction check identified drug interactions of the prescribed medication in nine out of ten patients. The vast majority of drug interaction reports were minor and not clinically relevant. The number of drug interactions as an indicator of quality of care is limited, as patient-specific information other than their medication regimens is not taken into account. GPs' classification in the clinical context and the context and the assessment of the benefits and risks of (poly-)medication is indispensable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Praxis
Praxis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信