多发性硬化症患者脑部核磁共振成像的自动评估大大缩短了阅读时间。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7
Victoria Sieber, Thilo Rusche, Shan Yang, Bram Stieltjes, Urs Fischer, Stefano Trebeschi, Philippe Cattin, Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Johanna M Lieb, Peter B Sporns
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者脑部核磁共振成像的自动评估大大缩短了阅读时间。","authors":"Victoria Sieber, Thilo Rusche, Shan Yang, Bram Stieltjes, Urs Fischer, Stefano Trebeschi, Philippe Cattin, Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Johanna M Lieb, Peter B Sporns","doi":"10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone. We evaluate whether assessment of new, expanding, and contrast-enhancing MS lesions can be done more time-efficiently by radiologists with assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline and three follow-up (FU) MRIs of thirty-five consecutive patients diagnosed with MS were assessed by a radiologist manually, and with assistance of an AI-tool. Results were discussed with a consultant neuroradiologist and time metrics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reading time for the resident radiologist was 9.05 min (95CI: 6.85-11:25). With AI-assistance, the reading time was reduced by 2.83 min (95CI: 3.28-2.41, p < 0.001). The reading decreased steadily from baseline to FU3 for the resident radiologist (9.85 min baseline, 9.21 FU1, 8.64 FU2 and 8.44 FU3, p < 0.001). Assistance of AI further remarkably decreased reading times during follow-ups (3.29 min FU1, 3.92 FU2, 3.79 FU3, p < 0.001) but not at baseline (0.26 min, p = 0.96). The baseline reading time of the resident radiologist was 5.04 min (p < 0.001), with each lesion adding 0.14 min (p < 0.001). There was a substantial decrease in the baseline reading time from 5.04 min to 1.59 min (p = 0.23) with AI-assistance. Discussion of the reading results of the resident with the neuroradiology consultant (as usual in clinical routine) was exemplary done for FU-3 MRIs and added another 3 min (CI:2.27-3.76) to the reading time without AI-assistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that AI-assisted reading of MRIs of patients with MS may be faster than evaluating these MRIs without AI-assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"2171-2176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated assessment of brain MRIs in multiple sclerosis patients significantly reduces reading time.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Sieber, Thilo Rusche, Shan Yang, Bram Stieltjes, Urs Fischer, Stefano Trebeschi, Philippe Cattin, Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Johanna M Lieb, Peter B Sporns\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone. We evaluate whether assessment of new, expanding, and contrast-enhancing MS lesions can be done more time-efficiently by radiologists with assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline and three follow-up (FU) MRIs of thirty-five consecutive patients diagnosed with MS were assessed by a radiologist manually, and with assistance of an AI-tool. Results were discussed with a consultant neuroradiologist and time metrics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reading time for the resident radiologist was 9.05 min (95CI: 6.85-11:25). With AI-assistance, the reading time was reduced by 2.83 min (95CI: 3.28-2.41, p < 0.001). The reading decreased steadily from baseline to FU3 for the resident radiologist (9.85 min baseline, 9.21 FU1, 8.64 FU2 and 8.44 FU3, p < 0.001). Assistance of AI further remarkably decreased reading times during follow-ups (3.29 min FU1, 3.92 FU2, 3.79 FU3, p < 0.001) but not at baseline (0.26 min, p = 0.96). The baseline reading time of the resident radiologist was 5.04 min (p < 0.001), with each lesion adding 0.14 min (p < 0.001). There was a substantial decrease in the baseline reading time from 5.04 min to 1.59 min (p = 0.23) with AI-assistance. Discussion of the reading results of the resident with the neuroradiology consultant (as usual in clinical routine) was exemplary done for FU-3 MRIs and added another 3 min (CI:2.27-3.76) to the reading time without AI-assistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that AI-assisted reading of MRIs of patients with MS may be faster than evaluating these MRIs without AI-assistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2171-2176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介磁共振成像(MRI)对多发性硬化(MS)病灶的评估繁琐、耗时且容易出错。我们评估了放射科医生在人工智能(AI)的帮助下能否更省时高效地评估新的、扩大的和对比度增强的多发性硬化病灶:方法:放射科医生在人工智能工具的协助下,对 35 名连续确诊的多发性硬化症患者的基线和三次随访(FU)核磁共振成像进行人工评估。结果与神经放射顾问进行了讨论,并对时间指标进行了评估:结果:放射科住院医生的平均阅读时间为 9.05 分钟(95CI:6.85-11:25)。在人工智能辅助下,阅片时间缩短了 2.83 分钟(95CI:3.28-2.41,p 结论:我们发现,人工智能辅助阅片的平均时间为 9.05 分钟(95CI:6.85-11:25):我们发现,在人工智能辅助下阅读多发性硬化症患者的 MRI 可能比在没有人工智能辅助的情况下评估这些 MRI 更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated assessment of brain MRIs in multiple sclerosis patients significantly reduces reading time.

Introduction: Assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone. We evaluate whether assessment of new, expanding, and contrast-enhancing MS lesions can be done more time-efficiently by radiologists with assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

Methods: Baseline and three follow-up (FU) MRIs of thirty-five consecutive patients diagnosed with MS were assessed by a radiologist manually, and with assistance of an AI-tool. Results were discussed with a consultant neuroradiologist and time metrics were evaluated.

Results: The mean reading time for the resident radiologist was 9.05 min (95CI: 6.85-11:25). With AI-assistance, the reading time was reduced by 2.83 min (95CI: 3.28-2.41, p < 0.001). The reading decreased steadily from baseline to FU3 for the resident radiologist (9.85 min baseline, 9.21 FU1, 8.64 FU2 and 8.44 FU3, p < 0.001). Assistance of AI further remarkably decreased reading times during follow-ups (3.29 min FU1, 3.92 FU2, 3.79 FU3, p < 0.001) but not at baseline (0.26 min, p = 0.96). The baseline reading time of the resident radiologist was 5.04 min (p < 0.001), with each lesion adding 0.14 min (p < 0.001). There was a substantial decrease in the baseline reading time from 5.04 min to 1.59 min (p = 0.23) with AI-assistance. Discussion of the reading results of the resident with the neuroradiology consultant (as usual in clinical routine) was exemplary done for FU-3 MRIs and added another 3 min (CI:2.27-3.76) to the reading time without AI-assistance.

Conclusion: We found that AI-assisted reading of MRIs of patients with MS may be faster than evaluating these MRIs without AI-assistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信