Karl R Khandalavala, Sarah E Ostlie, Katherine P Wallerius, Christine M Lohse, Amanda R Lohmann, Max M Ladsten, Matthew L Carlson
{"title":"在局部麻醉下进行人工耳蜗植入手术时使用阈值和阈上纯音测听进行术中声学监测:耳蜗植入手术中使用阈值和阈上纯音测听进行术中声学监测:一种有可能提高听力保护的简单而新颖的方法。","authors":"Karl R Khandalavala, Sarah E Ostlie, Katherine P Wallerius, Christine M Lohse, Amanda R Lohmann, Max M Ladsten, Matthew L Carlson","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the feasibility and potential utility of monitoring acoustic hearing on awake patients using intraoperative behavioral responses to threshold and suprathreshold stimuli while undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) under local anesthesia, without any form of sedation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of the first five cases performed by one surgeon.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with residual acoustic hearing undergoing CI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CI under local anesthesia, without any form of sedation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Procedural tolerance, reliability of intraoperative pure tone threshold and suprathreshold audiometry, and correlation of intraoperative findings with early postoperative residual hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five ears in four patients underwent CI, including three males and one female, with a median age of 61 years. Intraoperatively, patients reported reliable behavioral responses to pure tone threshold and suprathreshold stimuli and provided real-time feedback on perceived stimulus change to the surgeon just prior to, during, and immediately following electrode insertion. All patients were able to complete the operation under local anesthesia. During electrode insertion, three cases reported no change and two cases reported diminished stimulus perception that reversed with limited electrode pull back near terminal insertion. Immediate postoperative audiograms demonstrated preservation of bone conduction thresholds within 10 dB of their preoperative baseline for all cases, suggesting hearing preservation. Three-month postoperative AzBio in quiet scores were available for two patients, measuring 45% and 94%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This report describes the feasibility of intraoperative behavioral audiometry during CI under local anesthesia, using patient feedback during electrode insertion to optimize hearing preservation surgery. Akin to other surgical subspecialties that use real-time patient feedback where objective intraoperative measures of neurofunction are imperfect, we demonstrate feasibility and potential utility of live acoustic monitoring during CI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Acoustic Monitoring Using Threshold and Suprathreshold Pure Tone Audiometry during Cochlear Implantation Under Local Anesthesia: A Simple and Novel Method to Potentially Enhance Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Karl R Khandalavala, Sarah E Ostlie, Katherine P Wallerius, Christine M Lohse, Amanda R Lohmann, Max M Ladsten, Matthew L Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the feasibility and potential utility of monitoring acoustic hearing on awake patients using intraoperative behavioral responses to threshold and suprathreshold stimuli while undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) under local anesthesia, without any form of sedation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of the first five cases performed by one surgeon.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with residual acoustic hearing undergoing CI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CI under local anesthesia, without any form of sedation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Procedural tolerance, reliability of intraoperative pure tone threshold and suprathreshold audiometry, and correlation of intraoperative findings with early postoperative residual hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five ears in four patients underwent CI, including three males and one female, with a median age of 61 years. Intraoperatively, patients reported reliable behavioral responses to pure tone threshold and suprathreshold stimuli and provided real-time feedback on perceived stimulus change to the surgeon just prior to, during, and immediately following electrode insertion. All patients were able to complete the operation under local anesthesia. During electrode insertion, three cases reported no change and two cases reported diminished stimulus perception that reversed with limited electrode pull back near terminal insertion. Immediate postoperative audiograms demonstrated preservation of bone conduction thresholds within 10 dB of their preoperative baseline for all cases, suggesting hearing preservation. Three-month postoperative AzBio in quiet scores were available for two patients, measuring 45% and 94%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This report describes the feasibility of intraoperative behavioral audiometry during CI under local anesthesia, using patient feedback during electrode insertion to optimize hearing preservation surgery. Akin to other surgical subspecialties that use real-time patient feedback where objective intraoperative measures of neurofunction are imperfect, we demonstrate feasibility and potential utility of live acoustic monitoring during CI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"48-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004369\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的报告在局部麻醉下进行人工耳蜗植入术(CI)时,利用术中对阈值和阈上刺激的行为反应监测清醒患者听力的可行性和潜在实用性:研究环境:三级医疗学术医疗中心:地点:三级医疗学术医学中心:干预措施:在局部麻醉下进行 CI:干预措施:在局部麻醉下进行 CI,不使用任何形式的镇静剂:手术耐受性、术中纯音阈值和阈上测听仪的可靠性以及术中发现与术后早期残余听力的相关性:四名患者的五只耳朵接受了 CI,其中三男一女,中位年龄为 61 岁。术中,患者对纯音阈值和阈上刺激做出了可靠的行为反应,并在电极插入前、插入过程中和插入后立即向外科医生提供了感知刺激变化的实时反馈。所有患者都能在局部麻醉下完成手术。在电极插入过程中,有三例患者的听力没有变化,有两例患者的刺激感知减弱,但在终端插入附近有限的电极回拉后,情况发生了逆转。术后即刻听力图显示,所有病例的骨传导阈值都保持在术前基线的 10 分贝以内,表明听力得到了保护。两名患者术后三个月的安静时 AzBio 评分分别为 45% 和 94%:本报告描述了在局部麻醉下进行 CI 时术中行为测听的可行性,在电极插入过程中利用患者的反馈来优化听力保存手术。与其他使用实时患者反馈的外科亚专科类似,在术中对神经功能的客观测量并不完善的情况下,我们证明了在 CI 过程中进行实时声学监测的可行性和潜在效用。
Intraoperative Acoustic Monitoring Using Threshold and Suprathreshold Pure Tone Audiometry during Cochlear Implantation Under Local Anesthesia: A Simple and Novel Method to Potentially Enhance Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Surgery.
Objective: To report the feasibility and potential utility of monitoring acoustic hearing on awake patients using intraoperative behavioral responses to threshold and suprathreshold stimuli while undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) under local anesthesia, without any form of sedation.
Study design: Retrospective review of the first five cases performed by one surgeon.
Setting: Tertiary care academic medical center.
Patients: Adult patients with residual acoustic hearing undergoing CI.
Interventions: CI under local anesthesia, without any form of sedation.
Main outcome measures: Procedural tolerance, reliability of intraoperative pure tone threshold and suprathreshold audiometry, and correlation of intraoperative findings with early postoperative residual hearing.
Results: Five ears in four patients underwent CI, including three males and one female, with a median age of 61 years. Intraoperatively, patients reported reliable behavioral responses to pure tone threshold and suprathreshold stimuli and provided real-time feedback on perceived stimulus change to the surgeon just prior to, during, and immediately following electrode insertion. All patients were able to complete the operation under local anesthesia. During electrode insertion, three cases reported no change and two cases reported diminished stimulus perception that reversed with limited electrode pull back near terminal insertion. Immediate postoperative audiograms demonstrated preservation of bone conduction thresholds within 10 dB of their preoperative baseline for all cases, suggesting hearing preservation. Three-month postoperative AzBio in quiet scores were available for two patients, measuring 45% and 94%, respectively.
Conclusions: This report describes the feasibility of intraoperative behavioral audiometry during CI under local anesthesia, using patient feedback during electrode insertion to optimize hearing preservation surgery. Akin to other surgical subspecialties that use real-time patient feedback where objective intraoperative measures of neurofunction are imperfect, we demonstrate feasibility and potential utility of live acoustic monitoring during CI.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.