有机和无机纳米孔隙在减压和吹气过程中的二氧化碳利用和封存。

IF 4.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nanomaterials Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.3390/nano14211698
Jiadong Guo, Shaoqi Kong, Kunjie Li, Guoan Ren, Tao Yang, Kui Dong, Yueliang Liu
{"title":"有机和无机纳米孔隙在减压和吹气过程中的二氧化碳利用和封存。","authors":"Jiadong Guo, Shaoqi Kong, Kunjie Li, Guoan Ren, Tao Yang, Kui Dong, Yueliang Liu","doi":"10.3390/nano14211698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CO<sub>2</sub> injection in shale reservoirs is more suitable than the conventional recovering methods due to its easier injectivity and higher sweep efficiency. In this work, Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation is employed to investigate the adsorption/desorption behavior of CH<sub>4</sub>-C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>-C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub>-CO<sub>2</sub> mixtures in organic and inorganic nanopores during pressure drawdown and CO<sub>2</sub> huff and puff processes. The huff and puff process involves injecting CO<sub>2</sub> into the micro- and mesopores, where the system pressure is increased during the huffing process and decreased during the puffing process. The fundamental mechanism of shale gas recovery using the CO<sub>2</sub> injection method is thereby revealed from the nanopore-scale perspective. During primary gas production, CH<sub>4</sub> is more likely to be produced as the reservoir pressure drops. On the contrary, C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> tends to be trapped in these organic nanopores and is hard to extract, especially from micropores and inorganic pores. During the CO<sub>2</sub> huffing period, the adsorbed CH<sub>4</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> are recovered efficiently from the inorganic mesopores. On the contrary, the adsorbed C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> is slightly extracted from the inorganic micropores during the CO<sub>2</sub> puffing period. During the CO<sub>2</sub> puff process, the adsorbed CH<sub>4</sub> desorbs from the pore surface and is thus heavily recovered, while the adsorbed C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> cannot be readily produced. During CO<sub>2</sub> huff and puff, the recovery efficiency of CH<sub>4</sub> is higher in the organic pores than that in the inorganic pores. More importantly, the recovery efficiency of C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> reaches the highest levels in both the inorganic and organic pores during the CO<sub>2</sub> huff and puff process, suggesting that the CO<sub>2</sub> huff and puff method is more advanced for heavier hydrocarbon recovery compared to the pressure drawdown method. In addition to CO<sub>2</sub> storage, CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in the adsorbed state is safer than that in the free state. In our work, it was found that the high content of organic matter, high pressure, and small pores are beneficial factors for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration transforming into adsorbed state storage.</p>","PeriodicalId":18966,"journal":{"name":"Nanomaterials","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CO<sub>2</sub> Utilization and Sequestration in Organic and Inorganic Nanopores During Depressurization and Huff-n-Puff Process.\",\"authors\":\"Jiadong Guo, Shaoqi Kong, Kunjie Li, Guoan Ren, Tao Yang, Kui Dong, Yueliang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nano14211698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>CO<sub>2</sub> injection in shale reservoirs is more suitable than the conventional recovering methods due to its easier injectivity and higher sweep efficiency. In this work, Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation is employed to investigate the adsorption/desorption behavior of CH<sub>4</sub>-C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>-C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub>-CO<sub>2</sub> mixtures in organic and inorganic nanopores during pressure drawdown and CO<sub>2</sub> huff and puff processes. The huff and puff process involves injecting CO<sub>2</sub> into the micro- and mesopores, where the system pressure is increased during the huffing process and decreased during the puffing process. The fundamental mechanism of shale gas recovery using the CO<sub>2</sub> injection method is thereby revealed from the nanopore-scale perspective. During primary gas production, CH<sub>4</sub> is more likely to be produced as the reservoir pressure drops. On the contrary, C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> tends to be trapped in these organic nanopores and is hard to extract, especially from micropores and inorganic pores. During the CO<sub>2</sub> huffing period, the adsorbed CH<sub>4</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> are recovered efficiently from the inorganic mesopores. On the contrary, the adsorbed C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> is slightly extracted from the inorganic micropores during the CO<sub>2</sub> puffing period. During the CO<sub>2</sub> puff process, the adsorbed CH<sub>4</sub> desorbs from the pore surface and is thus heavily recovered, while the adsorbed C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> cannot be readily produced. During CO<sub>2</sub> huff and puff, the recovery efficiency of CH<sub>4</sub> is higher in the organic pores than that in the inorganic pores. More importantly, the recovery efficiency of C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> reaches the highest levels in both the inorganic and organic pores during the CO<sub>2</sub> huff and puff process, suggesting that the CO<sub>2</sub> huff and puff method is more advanced for heavier hydrocarbon recovery compared to the pressure drawdown method. In addition to CO<sub>2</sub> storage, CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in the adsorbed state is safer than that in the free state. In our work, it was found that the high content of organic matter, high pressure, and small pores are beneficial factors for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration transforming into adsorbed state storage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nanomaterials\",\"volume\":\"14 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nanomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211698\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在页岩储层中注入二氧化碳比传统的采收方法更合适,因为它更容易注入,扫采效率更高。在这项工作中,采用大卡农蒙特卡罗(GCMC)模拟研究了有机和无机纳米孔隙中的 CH4-C4H10 和 CH4-C4H10-CO2 混合物在压力下降和 CO2 吹胀过程中的吸附/解吸行为。膨压过程是将二氧化碳注入微孔和中孔,在膨压过程中系统压力升高,在膨压过程中系统压力降低。因此,从纳米孔尺度的角度揭示了利用二氧化碳注入法回收页岩气的基本机制。在初级天然气生产过程中,随着储层压力的降低,更有可能产生 CH4。相反,C4H10 往往被困在这些有机纳米孔隙中,很难被提取出来,尤其是从微孔和无机孔隙中。在二氧化碳吸入期间,吸附的 CH4 和 C4H10 能从无机中孔中有效回收。相反,在二氧化碳膨化过程中,被吸附的 C4H10 会从无机微孔中被少量提取出来。在二氧化碳膨化过程中,被吸附的 CH4 从孔隙表面解吸,因此被大量回收,而被吸附的 C4H10 却不能轻易生成。在二氧化碳膨化过程中,有机孔隙中的 CH4 回收效率高于无机孔隙。更重要的是,在二氧化碳膨化过程中,无机孔隙和有机孔隙中 C4H10 的回收效率都达到了最高水平,这表明二氧化碳膨化法与压力下降法相比,在重烃回收方面更为先进。除了二氧化碳封存之外,吸附状态下的二氧化碳封存比游离状态下的二氧化碳封存更安全。我们的研究发现,有机物含量高、压力高和孔隙小是二氧化碳封存转化为吸附态封存的有利因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CO2 Utilization and Sequestration in Organic and Inorganic Nanopores During Depressurization and Huff-n-Puff Process.

CO2 injection in shale reservoirs is more suitable than the conventional recovering methods due to its easier injectivity and higher sweep efficiency. In this work, Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation is employed to investigate the adsorption/desorption behavior of CH4-C4H10 and CH4-C4H10-CO2 mixtures in organic and inorganic nanopores during pressure drawdown and CO2 huff and puff processes. The huff and puff process involves injecting CO2 into the micro- and mesopores, where the system pressure is increased during the huffing process and decreased during the puffing process. The fundamental mechanism of shale gas recovery using the CO2 injection method is thereby revealed from the nanopore-scale perspective. During primary gas production, CH4 is more likely to be produced as the reservoir pressure drops. On the contrary, C4H10 tends to be trapped in these organic nanopores and is hard to extract, especially from micropores and inorganic pores. During the CO2 huffing period, the adsorbed CH4 and C4H10 are recovered efficiently from the inorganic mesopores. On the contrary, the adsorbed C4H10 is slightly extracted from the inorganic micropores during the CO2 puffing period. During the CO2 puff process, the adsorbed CH4 desorbs from the pore surface and is thus heavily recovered, while the adsorbed C4H10 cannot be readily produced. During CO2 huff and puff, the recovery efficiency of CH4 is higher in the organic pores than that in the inorganic pores. More importantly, the recovery efficiency of C4H10 reaches the highest levels in both the inorganic and organic pores during the CO2 huff and puff process, suggesting that the CO2 huff and puff method is more advanced for heavier hydrocarbon recovery compared to the pressure drawdown method. In addition to CO2 storage, CO2 sequestration in the adsorbed state is safer than that in the free state. In our work, it was found that the high content of organic matter, high pressure, and small pores are beneficial factors for CO2 sequestration transforming into adsorbed state storage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nanomaterials
Nanomaterials NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
3841
审稿时长
14.22 days
期刊介绍: Nanomaterials (ISSN 2076-4991) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves nanomaterials, with respect to their science and application. Thus, theoretical and experimental articles will be accepted, along with articles that deal with the synthesis and use of nanomaterials. Articles that synthesize information from multiple fields, and which place discoveries within a broader context, will be preferred. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental or methodical details, or both, must be provided for research articles. Computed data or files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. Nanomaterials is dedicated to a high scientific standard. All manuscripts undergo a rigorous reviewing process and decisions are based on the recommendations of independent reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信