堕胎是一种保健:在什么意义上?

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Grant R Martsolf, Christopher Tollefsen, Farr Curlin
{"title":"堕胎是一种保健:在什么意义上?","authors":"Grant R Martsolf, Christopher Tollefsen, Farr Curlin","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the wake of Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, many nursing organizations asserted that \"abortion is health care\" and access to it must be protected. Such a phrase makes clear claims about the meanings of \"health\" and \"care.\" How one defines these terms gives decisive direction to how a nurse must practice regarding not just elective abortion but also myriad interventions that divide bioethicists, including gender affirmative care, cosmetic surgery, and euthanasia. We consider the issue of elective abortion to illustrate the nature of disputes about the scope and limits of professional nursing. We describe two competing intuitions about the nature of health care namely that health care is either for (a) health, objectively defined or (b) well-being, patient defined. We discuss how these intuitions lead to different understandings of the intelligibility of the phrase \"abortion is health care\" and the implications for ethical discourse within professional nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":" ","pages":"102307"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion is healthcare: In what sense?\",\"authors\":\"Grant R Martsolf, Christopher Tollefsen, Farr Curlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the wake of Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, many nursing organizations asserted that \\\"abortion is health care\\\" and access to it must be protected. Such a phrase makes clear claims about the meanings of \\\"health\\\" and \\\"care.\\\" How one defines these terms gives decisive direction to how a nurse must practice regarding not just elective abortion but also myriad interventions that divide bioethicists, including gender affirmative care, cosmetic surgery, and euthanasia. We consider the issue of elective abortion to illustrate the nature of disputes about the scope and limits of professional nursing. We describe two competing intuitions about the nature of health care namely that health care is either for (a) health, objectively defined or (b) well-being, patient defined. We discuss how these intuitions lead to different understandings of the intelligibility of the phrase \\\"abortion is health care\\\" and the implications for ethical discourse within professional nursing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102307\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 "多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案 "之后,许多护理组织声称 "堕胎是保健",必须保护获得堕胎的机会。这句话对 "健康 "和 "护理 "的含义做出了明确的表述。如何定义这些术语对护士如何开展工作具有决定性的指导意义,这些工作不仅涉及选择性堕胎,还包括性别平权护理、整容手术和安乐死等众多令生命伦理学者产生分歧的干预措施。我们以选择性人工流产问题为例,说明了有关专业护理范围和界限的争议的性质。我们描述了关于医疗保健性质的两种相互冲突的直觉,即医疗保健要么是为了(a) 客观定义的健康,要么是为了(b) 病人定义的福祉。我们讨论了这些直觉如何导致对 "堕胎是医疗保健 "这一短语的不同理解,以及对专业护理伦理话语的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abortion is healthcare: In what sense?

In the wake of Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, many nursing organizations asserted that "abortion is health care" and access to it must be protected. Such a phrase makes clear claims about the meanings of "health" and "care." How one defines these terms gives decisive direction to how a nurse must practice regarding not just elective abortion but also myriad interventions that divide bioethicists, including gender affirmative care, cosmetic surgery, and euthanasia. We consider the issue of elective abortion to illustrate the nature of disputes about the scope and limits of professional nursing. We describe two competing intuitions about the nature of health care namely that health care is either for (a) health, objectively defined or (b) well-being, patient defined. We discuss how these intuitions lead to different understandings of the intelligibility of the phrase "abortion is health care" and the implications for ethical discourse within professional nursing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Outlook
Nursing Outlook 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信