放疗用各种含硼粒子增强铝基复合材料中子屏蔽性能的比较研究:蒙特卡罗模拟

IF 4.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nanomaterials Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.3390/nano14211696
Shiyan Yang, Yupeng Yao, Hanlong Wang, Hai Huang
{"title":"放疗用各种含硼粒子增强铝基复合材料中子屏蔽性能的比较研究:蒙特卡罗模拟","authors":"Shiyan Yang, Yupeng Yao, Hanlong Wang, Hai Huang","doi":"10.3390/nano14211696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess and compare the shielding performance of boron-containing materials for neutrons generated in proton therapy and used in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Five composites, including AlB<sub>2</sub>, Al-B<sub>4</sub>C, Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>, Al-BN, and Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>-BN, were selected as shielding materials, with concrete used as a benchmark. The mass fraction of boron compounds in these materials ranged from 10% to 50%. The Monte Carlo toolkit Geant4 was employed to calculate shielding parameters, including neutron ambient dose equivalent, dose values, and macroscopic cross-section. Results indicated that, compared to concrete, these boron-containing materials more effectively absorb thermal neutrons. When the boron compound exceeds 30 wt.%, these materials exhibit better shielding performance than concrete of the same thickness for neutrons generated by protons. For a given material, its shielding capability increases with boron content. Among the five materials when the material thickness and boron compound content are the same, the shielding performance for neutrons generated by protons, from best to worst, is as follows: Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>, Al-B<sub>4</sub>C, AlB<sub>2</sub>, Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>-BN, and Al-BN. For BNCT, the shielding performance from best to worst is in the following order: Al-B<sub>4</sub>C, AlB<sub>2</sub>, Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>, Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>-BN, and Al-BN. The results of this study provide references and guidelines for the selection and optimization of neutron shielding materials in proton therapy and BNCT facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18966,"journal":{"name":"Nanomaterials","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Neutron Shielding Performance in Al-Based Composites Reinforced with Various Boron-Containing Particles for Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Shiyan Yang, Yupeng Yao, Hanlong Wang, Hai Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nano14211696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to assess and compare the shielding performance of boron-containing materials for neutrons generated in proton therapy and used in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Five composites, including AlB<sub>2</sub>, Al-B<sub>4</sub>C, Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>, Al-BN, and Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>-BN, were selected as shielding materials, with concrete used as a benchmark. The mass fraction of boron compounds in these materials ranged from 10% to 50%. The Monte Carlo toolkit Geant4 was employed to calculate shielding parameters, including neutron ambient dose equivalent, dose values, and macroscopic cross-section. Results indicated that, compared to concrete, these boron-containing materials more effectively absorb thermal neutrons. When the boron compound exceeds 30 wt.%, these materials exhibit better shielding performance than concrete of the same thickness for neutrons generated by protons. For a given material, its shielding capability increases with boron content. Among the five materials when the material thickness and boron compound content are the same, the shielding performance for neutrons generated by protons, from best to worst, is as follows: Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>, Al-B<sub>4</sub>C, AlB<sub>2</sub>, Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>-BN, and Al-BN. For BNCT, the shielding performance from best to worst is in the following order: Al-B<sub>4</sub>C, AlB<sub>2</sub>, Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>, Al-TiB<sub>2</sub>-BN, and Al-BN. The results of this study provide references and guidelines for the selection and optimization of neutron shielding materials in proton therapy and BNCT facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nanomaterials\",\"volume\":\"14 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nanomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211696\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估和比较含硼材料对质子疗法中产生的中子和硼中子俘获疗法(BNCT)中使用的中子的屏蔽性能。以混凝土为基准,选择了五种复合材料作为屏蔽材料,包括 AlB2、Al-B4C、Al-TiB2、Al-BN 和 Al-TiB2-BN。这些材料中硼化合物的质量分数从 10%到 50%不等。使用蒙特卡罗工具包 Geant4 计算屏蔽参数,包括中子环境剂量当量、剂量值和宏观截面。结果表明,与混凝土相比,这些含硼材料能更有效地吸收热中子。当硼化合物含量超过 30 wt.%时,这些材料对质子产生的中子的屏蔽性能优于相同厚度的混凝土。对于特定材料,其屏蔽能力随硼含量的增加而提高。在材料厚度和硼化合物含量相同的情况下,五种材料对质子产生的中子的屏蔽性能从优到劣如下:Al-TiB2、Al-B4C、AlB2、Al-TiB2-BN 和 Al-BN。就 BNCT 而言,屏蔽性能从优到劣的顺序如下:Al-B4C、AlB2、Al-TiB2-BN 和 Al-BN:Al-B4C、AlB2、Al-TiB2、Al-TiB2-BN 和 Al-BN。这项研究的结果为质子治疗和 BNCT 设施中中子屏蔽材料的选择和优化提供了参考和指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Neutron Shielding Performance in Al-Based Composites Reinforced with Various Boron-Containing Particles for Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Simulation.

This study aimed to assess and compare the shielding performance of boron-containing materials for neutrons generated in proton therapy and used in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Five composites, including AlB2, Al-B4C, Al-TiB2, Al-BN, and Al-TiB2-BN, were selected as shielding materials, with concrete used as a benchmark. The mass fraction of boron compounds in these materials ranged from 10% to 50%. The Monte Carlo toolkit Geant4 was employed to calculate shielding parameters, including neutron ambient dose equivalent, dose values, and macroscopic cross-section. Results indicated that, compared to concrete, these boron-containing materials more effectively absorb thermal neutrons. When the boron compound exceeds 30 wt.%, these materials exhibit better shielding performance than concrete of the same thickness for neutrons generated by protons. For a given material, its shielding capability increases with boron content. Among the five materials when the material thickness and boron compound content are the same, the shielding performance for neutrons generated by protons, from best to worst, is as follows: Al-TiB2, Al-B4C, AlB2, Al-TiB2-BN, and Al-BN. For BNCT, the shielding performance from best to worst is in the following order: Al-B4C, AlB2, Al-TiB2, Al-TiB2-BN, and Al-BN. The results of this study provide references and guidelines for the selection and optimization of neutron shielding materials in proton therapy and BNCT facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nanomaterials
Nanomaterials NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
3841
审稿时长
14.22 days
期刊介绍: Nanomaterials (ISSN 2076-4991) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves nanomaterials, with respect to their science and application. Thus, theoretical and experimental articles will be accepted, along with articles that deal with the synthesis and use of nanomaterials. Articles that synthesize information from multiple fields, and which place discoveries within a broader context, will be preferred. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental or methodical details, or both, must be provided for research articles. Computed data or files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. Nanomaterials is dedicated to a high scientific standard. All manuscripts undergo a rigorous reviewing process and decisions are based on the recommendations of independent reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信