Ayelet Shapira-Daniels, Dana S King, Sari L Reisner, Lauren B Beach, Oseiwe Benjamin Eromosele, Sandhiya Ravichandran, Robert H Helm, Emelia J Benjamin, Carl G Streed
{"title":"变性和非二元成人社区医疗中心患者心律失常的患病率。","authors":"Ayelet Shapira-Daniels, Dana S King, Sari L Reisner, Lauren B Beach, Oseiwe Benjamin Eromosele, Sandhiya Ravichandran, Robert H Helm, Emelia J Benjamin, Carl G Streed","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias are well established. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of arrhythmias in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) adults. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study utilized electronic medical records from a center specializing in TGNB care. Adults aged <i>≥</i>18 years with <i>≥</i>2 medical visits between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, were categorized into self-reported gender groups: TGNB (transgender men, transgender women, nonbinary [NB]-assigned male at birth, NB-assigned female at birth), cisgender men, and cisgender women. The primary outcome was any arrhythmia using age- and race-adjusted regression models comparing transgender patients with cisgender men and cisgender women. Prevalence of arrhythmias was explored in transgender people with a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescription. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The sample included 49,862 adults, with 7121 (14%) TGNB persons. Median age was 28 years. Prevalence of arrhythmias was low (0.7-1.4% NB persons, 1.4-1.5% transgender persons). After adjustment, transgender women and transgender men had similar odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender men (transgender women: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.52; transgender men: aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.62, <i>p</i> = 0.37), but higher odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender women (transgender women: aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.34, <i>p</i> = 0.01; transgender men: aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.48-3.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Prevalence of arrhythmias appeared similar among transgender adults regardless of GAHT use (transgender men: 1.5% vs 1.9%, transgender women: 1.2% vs 2.1%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Further research examining arrhythmias in TGNB patients and across gender minority subgroups is warranted, including longitudinal studies evaluating the potential impact of GAHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ayelet Shapira-Daniels, Dana S King, Sari L Reisner, Lauren B Beach, Oseiwe Benjamin Eromosele, Sandhiya Ravichandran, Robert H Helm, Emelia J Benjamin, Carl G Streed\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias are well established. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of arrhythmias in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) adults. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study utilized electronic medical records from a center specializing in TGNB care. Adults aged <i>≥</i>18 years with <i>≥</i>2 medical visits between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, were categorized into self-reported gender groups: TGNB (transgender men, transgender women, nonbinary [NB]-assigned male at birth, NB-assigned female at birth), cisgender men, and cisgender women. The primary outcome was any arrhythmia using age- and race-adjusted regression models comparing transgender patients with cisgender men and cisgender women. Prevalence of arrhythmias was explored in transgender people with a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescription. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The sample included 49,862 adults, with 7121 (14%) TGNB persons. Median age was 28 years. Prevalence of arrhythmias was low (0.7-1.4% NB persons, 1.4-1.5% transgender persons). After adjustment, transgender women and transgender men had similar odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender men (transgender women: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.52; transgender men: aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.62, <i>p</i> = 0.37), but higher odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender women (transgender women: aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.34, <i>p</i> = 0.01; transgender men: aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.48-3.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Prevalence of arrhythmias appeared similar among transgender adults regardless of GAHT use (transgender men: 1.5% vs 1.9%, transgender women: 1.2% vs 2.1%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Further research examining arrhythmias in TGNB patients and across gender minority subgroups is warranted, including longitudinal studies evaluating the potential impact of GAHT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LGBT health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LGBT health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2024.0151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2024.0151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:心律失常的性别差异已得到公认。本研究旨在探讨变性和非二元性(TGNB)成年人心律失常的患病率。研究方法这项横断面研究利用了一家专门从事变性和非二元性(TGNB)护理中心的电子病历。在 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间,年龄≥18 岁且就诊次数≥2 次的成年人被分为自报性别组:TGNB(变性男性、变性女性、出生时被指定为男性的非二元 [NB] 性别者、出生时被指定为女性的非二元 [NB] 性别者)、顺性别男性和顺性别女性。主要结果是任何心律失常,使用年龄和种族调整回归模型将变性患者与顺性别男性和顺性别女性进行比较。研究还探讨了变性人在接受性别确认激素疗法(GAHT)处方后心律失常的发生率。研究结果样本包括 49,862 名成年人,其中 7121 人(14%)为变性人。中位年龄为 28 岁。心律失常的发病率较低(0.7-1.4% 的 NB 人,1.4-1.5% 的变性人)。经调整后,变性女性和变性男性与同性男性相比,发生任何心律失常的几率相似(变性女性:调整后的几率比 [aOR] 0.89,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.63-1.24,P = 0.52;变性男性:aOR 1.17,95% CI 0.82-1.62,p = 0.37),但与顺性别女性相比,出现任何心律失常的几率更高(变性女性:aOR 1.65,95% CI 1.13-2.34,p = 0.01;变性男性:aOR 2.15,95% CI 1.48-3.04,p < 0.001)。无论是否使用 GAHT,变性成人的心律失常患病率似乎相似(变性男性:1.5% vs 1.9%;变性女性:1.2% vs 2.1%)。结论有必要进一步研究 TGNB 患者的心律失常情况以及不同性别少数群体的心律失常情况,包括评估 GAHT 潜在影响的纵向研究。
Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients.
Purpose: Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias are well established. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of arrhythmias in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized electronic medical records from a center specializing in TGNB care. Adults aged ≥18 years with ≥2 medical visits between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, were categorized into self-reported gender groups: TGNB (transgender men, transgender women, nonbinary [NB]-assigned male at birth, NB-assigned female at birth), cisgender men, and cisgender women. The primary outcome was any arrhythmia using age- and race-adjusted regression models comparing transgender patients with cisgender men and cisgender women. Prevalence of arrhythmias was explored in transgender people with a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescription. Results: The sample included 49,862 adults, with 7121 (14%) TGNB persons. Median age was 28 years. Prevalence of arrhythmias was low (0.7-1.4% NB persons, 1.4-1.5% transgender persons). After adjustment, transgender women and transgender men had similar odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender men (transgender women: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.24, p = 0.52; transgender men: aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.62, p = 0.37), but higher odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender women (transgender women: aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.34, p = 0.01; transgender men: aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.48-3.04, p < 0.001). Prevalence of arrhythmias appeared similar among transgender adults regardless of GAHT use (transgender men: 1.5% vs 1.9%, transgender women: 1.2% vs 2.1%). Conclusion: Further research examining arrhythmias in TGNB patients and across gender minority subgroups is warranted, including longitudinal studies evaluating the potential impact of GAHT.
LGBT healthPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍:
LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.