让认知健康的研究参与者了解可改变的痴呆症风险因素:伦理意义。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Mackenzie Graham, Martin Rossor, Brian Lawlor, Lorina Naci
{"title":"让认知健康的研究参与者了解可改变的痴呆症风险因素:伦理意义。","authors":"Mackenzie Graham, Martin Rossor, Brian Lawlor, Lorina Naci","doi":"10.1177/13872877241292370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has shown that up to 40% of dementia incidence can be accounted for by 12 modifiable lifestyle risk factors. However, the predictive value of these risks factors at an individual level remains uncertain. Ethical considerations that are typically invoked with respect to the disclosure of individual research results-beneficence and non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice-do not provide conclusive justification for, or against, disclosing modifiable risk factors for future dementia to cognitively unimpaired research participants. We argue for a different approach to evaluating the disclosure of individual-level modifiable risk factors for dementia. Rather than focusing on individual-level disease prediction and prevention, we suggest that disclosure should be evaluated based on the impact of behavioral and lifestyle changes on current brain health.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877241292370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing cognitively healthy research participants of modifiable dementia risk factors: Ethical implications.\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie Graham, Martin Rossor, Brian Lawlor, Lorina Naci\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877241292370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research has shown that up to 40% of dementia incidence can be accounted for by 12 modifiable lifestyle risk factors. However, the predictive value of these risks factors at an individual level remains uncertain. Ethical considerations that are typically invoked with respect to the disclosure of individual research results-beneficence and non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice-do not provide conclusive justification for, or against, disclosing modifiable risk factors for future dementia to cognitively unimpaired research participants. We argue for a different approach to evaluating the disclosure of individual-level modifiable risk factors for dementia. Rather than focusing on individual-level disease prediction and prevention, we suggest that disclosure should be evaluated based on the impact of behavioral and lifestyle changes on current brain health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877241292370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241292370\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241292370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,多达 40% 的痴呆症发病率可由 12 个可改变的生活方式风险因素引起。然而,这些风险因素在个人层面的预测价值仍不确定。在披露个人研究成果时通常会引用的伦理考虑因素--有利和无利、尊重自主权和公正--并不能为向认知能力未受损的研究参与者披露未来痴呆症的可改变风险因素或反对披露可改变风险因素提供确凿的理由。我们主张采用不同的方法来评估披露个人层面的痴呆症可改变风险因素。我们建议,与其将重点放在个人层面的疾病预测和预防上,不如根据行为和生活方式的改变对当前大脑健康的影响来评估披露情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informing cognitively healthy research participants of modifiable dementia risk factors: Ethical implications.

Research has shown that up to 40% of dementia incidence can be accounted for by 12 modifiable lifestyle risk factors. However, the predictive value of these risks factors at an individual level remains uncertain. Ethical considerations that are typically invoked with respect to the disclosure of individual research results-beneficence and non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice-do not provide conclusive justification for, or against, disclosing modifiable risk factors for future dementia to cognitively unimpaired research participants. We argue for a different approach to evaluating the disclosure of individual-level modifiable risk factors for dementia. Rather than focusing on individual-level disease prediction and prevention, we suggest that disclosure should be evaluated based on the impact of behavioral and lifestyle changes on current brain health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信