地匹福林治疗意大利接受血液透析的慢性肾病相关瘙痒症患者的成本效益。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lucio Manenti, Andrea Marcellusi, Eugenio Di Brino, Andrea Aiello, Asia Barugolo, Patrizia Berto, Marco Soro
{"title":"地匹福林治疗意大利接受血液透析的慢性肾病相关瘙痒症患者的成本效益。","authors":"Lucio Manenti, Andrea Marcellusi, Eugenio Di Brino, Andrea Aiello, Asia Barugolo, Patrizia Berto, Marco Soro","doi":"10.1007/s40620-024-02144-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus is a condition that strongly impacts CKD patients and is associated with increased morbidity/mortality, and worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Difelikefalin is currently the only drug approved in Europe specifically for treating moderate to severe CKD-associated pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The KALM-1 and KALM-2 trials showed better efficacy of difelikefalin vs placebo and best supportive care. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of difelikefalin according to the Italian National Health Service (NHS) perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort model represented by four health states (No, Mild, Moderate, and Severe pruritus) was adapted to the Italian setting. The model used data from the KALM-1 and -2 trials for efficacy, integrated with other publications for HRQoL estimations. To assess the cost of disease management, a recent Italian publication on CKD-associated pruritus was used and a price of €27 per difelikefalin vial was assumed. The base case analysis over a 15-year time horizon, and an additional 10-year scenario analysis, were established. Additionally, both deterministic univariate analysis and probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analyses were developed. Discount rates of 3% were applied. An acceptability threshold of 40,000 €/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that difelikefalin plus best supportive care is cost-effective vs best supportive care alone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, in the base case, of €35,823/QALY. Both the scenario and sensitivity analyses confirmed the strength of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Difelikefalin was found to be a cost-effective treatment for the Italian NHS. These results support its reimbursement and its inclusion in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost effectiveness of difelikefalin for the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus undergoing hemodialysis in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Lucio Manenti, Andrea Marcellusi, Eugenio Di Brino, Andrea Aiello, Asia Barugolo, Patrizia Berto, Marco Soro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40620-024-02144-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus is a condition that strongly impacts CKD patients and is associated with increased morbidity/mortality, and worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Difelikefalin is currently the only drug approved in Europe specifically for treating moderate to severe CKD-associated pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The KALM-1 and KALM-2 trials showed better efficacy of difelikefalin vs placebo and best supportive care. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of difelikefalin according to the Italian National Health Service (NHS) perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort model represented by four health states (No, Mild, Moderate, and Severe pruritus) was adapted to the Italian setting. The model used data from the KALM-1 and -2 trials for efficacy, integrated with other publications for HRQoL estimations. To assess the cost of disease management, a recent Italian publication on CKD-associated pruritus was used and a price of €27 per difelikefalin vial was assumed. The base case analysis over a 15-year time horizon, and an additional 10-year scenario analysis, were established. Additionally, both deterministic univariate analysis and probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analyses were developed. Discount rates of 3% were applied. An acceptability threshold of 40,000 €/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that difelikefalin plus best supportive care is cost-effective vs best supportive care alone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, in the base case, of €35,823/QALY. Both the scenario and sensitivity analyses confirmed the strength of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Difelikefalin was found to be a cost-effective treatment for the Italian NHS. These results support its reimbursement and its inclusion in routine clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02144-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02144-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性肾脏病(CKD)相关性瘙痒症是一种对慢性肾脏病患者影响很大的疾病,与发病率/死亡率增加和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)下降有关。目前,Difelikefalin 是欧洲唯一获准专门用于治疗血液透析患者中度至重度 CKD 相关性瘙痒症的药物。KALM-1和KALM-2试验显示,与安慰剂和最佳支持治疗相比,地夫利卡林的疗效更好。本研究的目的是根据意大利国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的观点,调查地匹福林的成本效益:方法:根据意大利的实际情况,对以四种健康状态(无瘙痒、轻度瘙痒、中度瘙痒和重度瘙痒)为代表的队列模型进行了调整。该模型使用了 KALM-1 和 -2 试验的疗效数据,并结合其他出版物对 HRQoL 进行了估算。为评估疾病管理成本,使用了意大利最近发表的一篇关于 CKD 相关瘙痒症的文章,并假设每瓶地匹福林的价格为 27 欧元。建立了 15 年时间跨度的基本情况分析和额外的 10 年情景分析。此外,还进行了确定性单变量分析和概率性多变量敏感性分析。贴现率为 3%。考虑的可接受性阈值为 40,000 欧元/质量调整生命年(QALY):结果表明,地匹福林加最佳支持治疗与单用最佳支持治疗相比具有成本效益,在基础病例中,增量成本效益比为 35,823 欧元/QALY。情景分析和敏感性分析均证实了结果的有效性:对意大利国家医疗服务体系而言,地夫瑞克法林是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。这些结果支持对其进行报销并将其纳入常规临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost effectiveness of difelikefalin for the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus undergoing hemodialysis in Italy.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus is a condition that strongly impacts CKD patients and is associated with increased morbidity/mortality, and worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Difelikefalin is currently the only drug approved in Europe specifically for treating moderate to severe CKD-associated pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The KALM-1 and KALM-2 trials showed better efficacy of difelikefalin vs placebo and best supportive care. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of difelikefalin according to the Italian National Health Service (NHS) perspective.

Methods: A cohort model represented by four health states (No, Mild, Moderate, and Severe pruritus) was adapted to the Italian setting. The model used data from the KALM-1 and -2 trials for efficacy, integrated with other publications for HRQoL estimations. To assess the cost of disease management, a recent Italian publication on CKD-associated pruritus was used and a price of €27 per difelikefalin vial was assumed. The base case analysis over a 15-year time horizon, and an additional 10-year scenario analysis, were established. Additionally, both deterministic univariate analysis and probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analyses were developed. Discount rates of 3% were applied. An acceptability threshold of 40,000 €/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was considered.

Results: The results show that difelikefalin plus best supportive care is cost-effective vs best supportive care alone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, in the base case, of €35,823/QALY. Both the scenario and sensitivity analyses confirmed the strength of the results.

Conclusions: Difelikefalin was found to be a cost-effective treatment for the Italian NHS. These results support its reimbursement and its inclusion in routine clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信