减少G-CSF动员的健康成人捐献者血小板损失的动员和无细胞采集策略。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Brittany Castro, Jane Huang, Julie Le, Diana Pascua, Hirona Goto, Denise Kirby, David Lin
{"title":"减少G-CSF动员的健康成人捐献者血小板损失的动员和无细胞采集策略。","authors":"Brittany Castro,&nbsp;Jane Huang,&nbsp;Julie Le,&nbsp;Diana Pascua,&nbsp;Hirona Goto,&nbsp;Denise Kirby,&nbsp;David Lin","doi":"10.1002/jca.22150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilizes hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) into the peripheral blood. Donor peripheral blood platelet loss has been observed during both G-CSF mobilization and apheresis collection. This study evaluates two strategies to reduce donor platelet loss, preserve product CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency and increase volume of whole blood (WB) processed. One hundred and two adults healthy donors were mobilized with either standard dose G-CSF (9.5–12 mcg/kg/day × 4 days) or lower dose G-CSF (7.5–10 mcg/kg/day × 4 days) according to their pre-mobilization platelet count. Apheresis centrifugal force was adjusted by lowering the packing factor (PF) setting on the apheresis instrument. Between-group differences were observed in absolute donor platelet loss (<i>p</i> = 0.04) favoring lower G-CSF dosing, while percent donor platelet loss trended towards significance (<i>p</i> = 0.10). Lowering PF from the manufacturer's default of 4.5 to 4.0 demonstrated between-group differences in absolute donor platelet loss (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), percent donor platelet loss (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and apheresis product platelet content (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). No differences were observed in the product CD34+ cell content and CD34+ cell collection efficiency when PF was reduced to 4.0. Additionally, a higher volume of WB could be processed due to reduced donor platelet loss. Together, these two strategies may mitigate the risk of cumulative platelet loss in G-CSF mobilized healthy donors undergoing apheresis collection, thereby increasing the likelihood of completing the target total blood volume to be processed while maintaining donor safety.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobilization and Apheresis Collection Strategies to Reduce Platelet Loss in G-CSF Mobilized Healthy Adult Donors\",\"authors\":\"Brittany Castro,&nbsp;Jane Huang,&nbsp;Julie Le,&nbsp;Diana Pascua,&nbsp;Hirona Goto,&nbsp;Denise Kirby,&nbsp;David Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jca.22150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilizes hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) into the peripheral blood. Donor peripheral blood platelet loss has been observed during both G-CSF mobilization and apheresis collection. This study evaluates two strategies to reduce donor platelet loss, preserve product CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency and increase volume of whole blood (WB) processed. One hundred and two adults healthy donors were mobilized with either standard dose G-CSF (9.5–12 mcg/kg/day × 4 days) or lower dose G-CSF (7.5–10 mcg/kg/day × 4 days) according to their pre-mobilization platelet count. Apheresis centrifugal force was adjusted by lowering the packing factor (PF) setting on the apheresis instrument. Between-group differences were observed in absolute donor platelet loss (<i>p</i> = 0.04) favoring lower G-CSF dosing, while percent donor platelet loss trended towards significance (<i>p</i> = 0.10). Lowering PF from the manufacturer's default of 4.5 to 4.0 demonstrated between-group differences in absolute donor platelet loss (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), percent donor platelet loss (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and apheresis product platelet content (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). No differences were observed in the product CD34+ cell content and CD34+ cell collection efficiency when PF was reduced to 4.0. Additionally, a higher volume of WB could be processed due to reduced donor platelet loss. Together, these two strategies may mitigate the risk of cumulative platelet loss in G-CSF mobilized healthy donors undergoing apheresis collection, thereby increasing the likelihood of completing the target total blood volume to be processed while maintaining donor safety.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可动员造血祖细胞(HPC)进入外周血。在 G-CSF 动员和无细胞采集过程中都观察到了捐献者外周血血小板的丢失。本研究评估了两种策略,以减少捐献者血小板损失,保持产品 CD34+ 细胞产量和采集效率,并增加全血(WB)处理量。根据捐献者动员前的血小板数量,用标准剂量 G-CSF(9.5-12 微克/千克/天×4 天)或低剂量 G-CSF(7.5-10 微克/千克/天×4 天)对 120 名成年健康捐献者进行动员。通过降低离心仪器上的包装因子(PF)设置来调整离心力。在供体血小板绝对损失方面观察到了组间差异(p = 0.04),G-CSF 剂量越低,供体血小板损失百分比越显著(p = 0.10)。将 PF 从生产商默认的 4.5 降到 4.0 显示了供体血小板绝对损失的组间差异(p = 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobilization and Apheresis Collection Strategies to Reduce Platelet Loss in G-CSF Mobilized Healthy Adult Donors

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilizes hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) into the peripheral blood. Donor peripheral blood platelet loss has been observed during both G-CSF mobilization and apheresis collection. This study evaluates two strategies to reduce donor platelet loss, preserve product CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency and increase volume of whole blood (WB) processed. One hundred and two adults healthy donors were mobilized with either standard dose G-CSF (9.5–12 mcg/kg/day × 4 days) or lower dose G-CSF (7.5–10 mcg/kg/day × 4 days) according to their pre-mobilization platelet count. Apheresis centrifugal force was adjusted by lowering the packing factor (PF) setting on the apheresis instrument. Between-group differences were observed in absolute donor platelet loss (p = 0.04) favoring lower G-CSF dosing, while percent donor platelet loss trended towards significance (p = 0.10). Lowering PF from the manufacturer's default of 4.5 to 4.0 demonstrated between-group differences in absolute donor platelet loss (p < 0.05), percent donor platelet loss (p < 0.001), and apheresis product platelet content (p < 0.001). No differences were observed in the product CD34+ cell content and CD34+ cell collection efficiency when PF was reduced to 4.0. Additionally, a higher volume of WB could be processed due to reduced donor platelet loss. Together, these two strategies may mitigate the risk of cumulative platelet loss in G-CSF mobilized healthy donors undergoing apheresis collection, thereby increasing the likelihood of completing the target total blood volume to be processed while maintaining donor safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信