牧场轨道饲养马匹与传统牧场饲养马匹相比对环境的影响以及马匹每天的自愿运动情况。

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jenna Farmer Long , Jamie Duberstein , Kayla Costin , Todd Callaway , Alexander Abrams , Brooklyne Wassel , Kimberly Toal , Kylee Duberstein
{"title":"牧场轨道饲养马匹与传统牧场饲养马匹相比对环境的影响以及马匹每天的自愿运动情况。","authors":"Jenna Farmer Long ,&nbsp;Jamie Duberstein ,&nbsp;Kayla Costin ,&nbsp;Todd Callaway ,&nbsp;Alexander Abrams ,&nbsp;Brooklyne Wassel ,&nbsp;Kimberly Toal ,&nbsp;Kylee Duberstein","doi":"10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pasture tracks are a modern equine housing trend often implemented as a weight control strategy due to the belief that they promote movement, though this is not proven experimentally. To test movement of horses housed in pasture tracks as compared to conventional pasture housing, two experiments were performed using a track (0.2ha, 3.5m in width, 561 m total distance) created around the perimeter of a 2.0 ha pasture. In experiment 1, eight horses were paired and rotated between three treatment locations: track (T), small 2 ha pasture housed within the track (SP), and a larger 20 ha pasture on the same farm (LP). A GPS-equipped watch attached to the crown piece of a halter tracked movement of horses over a ten-week study as they rotated in pairs to each location, with testing in all locations occurring simultaneously. Environmental impacts of housing were evaluated by comparing vegetative biomass and soil relocation throughout the study. In experiment 2, the same horses (n = 8) were rotated in isolated pairs to T or SP, with only one pair of horses tested at a time to ensure that social influences did not confound movement data. Collective results indicate that horses traveled approximately the same distance in T as compared to SP or LP. However, detrimental environmental impacts resulted from the track, including a decrease in vegetative biomass and greater sediment deposition from runoff. Potential environmental impacts should be further investigated to develop best management practices to mitigate erosion caused by pasture tracks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 105215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental impacts and daily voluntary movement of horses housed in pasture tracks as compared to conventional pasture housing\",\"authors\":\"Jenna Farmer Long ,&nbsp;Jamie Duberstein ,&nbsp;Kayla Costin ,&nbsp;Todd Callaway ,&nbsp;Alexander Abrams ,&nbsp;Brooklyne Wassel ,&nbsp;Kimberly Toal ,&nbsp;Kylee Duberstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pasture tracks are a modern equine housing trend often implemented as a weight control strategy due to the belief that they promote movement, though this is not proven experimentally. To test movement of horses housed in pasture tracks as compared to conventional pasture housing, two experiments were performed using a track (0.2ha, 3.5m in width, 561 m total distance) created around the perimeter of a 2.0 ha pasture. In experiment 1, eight horses were paired and rotated between three treatment locations: track (T), small 2 ha pasture housed within the track (SP), and a larger 20 ha pasture on the same farm (LP). A GPS-equipped watch attached to the crown piece of a halter tracked movement of horses over a ten-week study as they rotated in pairs to each location, with testing in all locations occurring simultaneously. Environmental impacts of housing were evaluated by comparing vegetative biomass and soil relocation throughout the study. In experiment 2, the same horses (n = 8) were rotated in isolated pairs to T or SP, with only one pair of horses tested at a time to ensure that social influences did not confound movement data. Collective results indicate that horses traveled approximately the same distance in T as compared to SP or LP. However, detrimental environmental impacts resulted from the track, including a decrease in vegetative biomass and greater sediment deposition from runoff. Potential environmental impacts should be further investigated to develop best management practices to mitigate erosion caused by pasture tracks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737080624002211\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737080624002211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牧场跑道是现代马匹饲养的一种趋势,经常被用作控制体重的策略,因为人们相信它能促进马匹的运动,尽管这一点并没有得到实验证明。为了测试与传统草场饲养方式相比,在草场轨道上饲养的马匹的运动情况,我们使用在 2.0 公顷草场周围建造的轨道(0.2 公顷,宽 3.5 米,总长 561 米)进行了两次实验。在实验 1 中,8 匹马配对在三个处理地点之间轮换:跑道(T)、跑道内 2 公顷的小草场(SP)和同一农场内 20 公顷的大草场(LP)。在为期十周的研究中,马匹成对轮换到各个地点,所有地点的测试同时进行。在整个研究过程中,通过比较植被生物量和土壤迁移情况来评估饲养对环境的影响。在实验 2 中,同样的马(n = 8)成对轮换到 T 或 SP,每次只测试一对马,以确保社会影响不会干扰运动数据。综合结果表明,与 SP 或 LP 相比,马匹在 T 中的移动距离大致相同。然而,赛道对环境造成了不利影响,包括植被生物量减少和径流造成的沉积物增加。应进一步调查潜在的环境影响,以制定最佳管理方法,减轻牧场跑道造成的水土流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental impacts and daily voluntary movement of horses housed in pasture tracks as compared to conventional pasture housing
Pasture tracks are a modern equine housing trend often implemented as a weight control strategy due to the belief that they promote movement, though this is not proven experimentally. To test movement of horses housed in pasture tracks as compared to conventional pasture housing, two experiments were performed using a track (0.2ha, 3.5m in width, 561 m total distance) created around the perimeter of a 2.0 ha pasture. In experiment 1, eight horses were paired and rotated between three treatment locations: track (T), small 2 ha pasture housed within the track (SP), and a larger 20 ha pasture on the same farm (LP). A GPS-equipped watch attached to the crown piece of a halter tracked movement of horses over a ten-week study as they rotated in pairs to each location, with testing in all locations occurring simultaneously. Environmental impacts of housing were evaluated by comparing vegetative biomass and soil relocation throughout the study. In experiment 2, the same horses (n = 8) were rotated in isolated pairs to T or SP, with only one pair of horses tested at a time to ensure that social influences did not confound movement data. Collective results indicate that horses traveled approximately the same distance in T as compared to SP or LP. However, detrimental environmental impacts resulted from the track, including a decrease in vegetative biomass and greater sediment deposition from runoff. Potential environmental impacts should be further investigated to develop best management practices to mitigate erosion caused by pasture tracks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (JEVS) is an international publication designed for the practicing equine veterinarian, equine researcher, and other equine health care specialist. Published monthly, each issue of JEVS includes original research, reviews, case reports, short communications, and clinical techniques from leaders in the equine veterinary field, covering such topics as laminitis, reproduction, infectious disease, parasitology, behavior, podology, internal medicine, surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信