急诊科的丁丙诺啡管理和处方:2014-2021 年全国分析。

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Christine Ramdin, Tanner McGowan, Jeanmarie Perrone, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Lewis S Nelson
{"title":"急诊科的丁丙诺啡管理和处方:2014-2021 年全国分析。","authors":"Christine Ramdin, Tanner McGowan, Jeanmarie Perrone, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Lewis S Nelson","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine provides a low barrier access point and safety net to mitigate opioid overdose risk and increase treatment engagement. We sought to describe trends and patterns of buprenorphine utilization from the ED using national data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2014 and 2021. Our primary outcomes were trends in ED buprenorphine utilization. We described patient demographics, visit characteristics, and conducted trend analyses. We utilized logistic regression to determine predictors of buprenorphine prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2014 and 2021, there were 341,875 ED visits in which buprenorphine was administered, with no change over time (P = 0.08). There were 392,031 visits where buprenorphine was prescribed at ED discharge, with an increase over time (P = 0.01). The largest rise in rate for discharge prescriptions occurred between 2019 and 2020 (37,737 [0.03%] visits vs 126,041 [0.10%]) (233% increase in rate, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was an increase in buprenorphine prescribing at ED discharge, there was no increase in administration. The acceleration in prescribing between 2019 and 2020 suggests that the ED may have been a safety net for patients who lost access to addiction care during COVID-19. Future studies should explore reasons for disparities and barriers to buprenorphine utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buprenorphine Administration and Prescribing at Emergency Departments: A National Analysis from 2014-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Ramdin, Tanner McGowan, Jeanmarie Perrone, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Lewis S Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine provides a low barrier access point and safety net to mitigate opioid overdose risk and increase treatment engagement. We sought to describe trends and patterns of buprenorphine utilization from the ED using national data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2014 and 2021. Our primary outcomes were trends in ED buprenorphine utilization. We described patient demographics, visit characteristics, and conducted trend analyses. We utilized logistic regression to determine predictors of buprenorphine prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2014 and 2021, there were 341,875 ED visits in which buprenorphine was administered, with no change over time (P = 0.08). There were 392,031 visits where buprenorphine was prescribed at ED discharge, with an increase over time (P = 0.01). The largest rise in rate for discharge prescriptions occurred between 2019 and 2020 (37,737 [0.03%] visits vs 126,041 [0.10%]) (233% increase in rate, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was an increase in buprenorphine prescribing at ED discharge, there was no increase in administration. The acceleration in prescribing between 2019 and 2020 suggests that the ED may have been a safety net for patients who lost access to addiction care during COVID-19. Future studies should explore reasons for disparities and barriers to buprenorphine utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001402\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊科(ED)启动的丁丙诺啡为降低阿片类药物过量风险和提高治疗参与度提供了一个低门槛的接入点和安全网。我们试图利用全国数据描述急诊科使用丁丙诺啡的趋势和模式:这是一项对 2014 年至 2021 年间全国医院非住院医疗护理调查的回顾性研究。我们的主要结果是急诊室丁丙诺啡使用的趋势。我们描述了患者的人口统计学特征、就诊特征,并进行了趋势分析。我们利用逻辑回归来确定丁丙诺啡处方的预测因素:2014 年至 2021 年期间,有 341875 次急诊就诊使用了丁丙诺啡,且随时间推移没有变化(P = 0.08)。有 392,031 人次在急诊室出院时开具了丁丙诺啡处方,且随时间推移有所增加(P = 0.01)。出院处方率的最大增幅出现在 2019 年至 2020 年期间(37737 [0.03%] 人次 vs 126041 [0.10%])(增幅为 233%,P < 0.0001):虽然急诊室出院时的丁丙诺啡处方量有所增加,但用药量并未增加。2019 年至 2020 年期间处方量的增加表明,对于在 COVID-19 期间失去成瘾治疗机会的患者来说,急诊室可能是一个安全网。未来的研究应探讨丁丙诺啡使用方面存在差异和障碍的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Buprenorphine Administration and Prescribing at Emergency Departments: A National Analysis from 2014-2021.

Background: Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine provides a low barrier access point and safety net to mitigate opioid overdose risk and increase treatment engagement. We sought to describe trends and patterns of buprenorphine utilization from the ED using national data.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2014 and 2021. Our primary outcomes were trends in ED buprenorphine utilization. We described patient demographics, visit characteristics, and conducted trend analyses. We utilized logistic regression to determine predictors of buprenorphine prescribing.

Results: Between 2014 and 2021, there were 341,875 ED visits in which buprenorphine was administered, with no change over time (P = 0.08). There were 392,031 visits where buprenorphine was prescribed at ED discharge, with an increase over time (P = 0.01). The largest rise in rate for discharge prescriptions occurred between 2019 and 2020 (37,737 [0.03%] visits vs 126,041 [0.10%]) (233% increase in rate, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Although there was an increase in buprenorphine prescribing at ED discharge, there was no increase in administration. The acceleration in prescribing between 2019 and 2020 suggests that the ED may have been a safety net for patients who lost access to addiction care during COVID-19. Future studies should explore reasons for disparities and barriers to buprenorphine utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信