非结肠直肠分站服务中的结肠直肠急诊手术结果--一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rebecca Swan, Emma MacVicar, Kate Carey, Dimitrios Damaskos, Nicholas Ventham
{"title":"非结肠直肠分站服务中的结肠直肠急诊手术结果--一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Rebecca Swan, Emma MacVicar, Kate Carey, Dimitrios Damaskos, Nicholas Ventham","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03837-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency colorectal surgery carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Subspecialisation and split-site geographically distinct services may lead to critically unwell patients presenting to a non-colorectal specialist centre requiring urgent on-site intervention.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to determine outcomes of this high-risk patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational retrospective study of emergency colorectal laparotomies at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (RIE) between January 2016 and August 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included rate of primary anastomosis, complications and overall mortality. Subgroup analysis of the vascular ischaemia cohort and colorectal surgeon involvement was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighteen patients were included. The median NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) score was 6.4% (IQR 2.5%-16.7%) and the 30-day mortality rate was 22% (26/118). The rate of primary anastomosis was 24.6%. Twenty-five patients had a vascular ischaemic pathology demonstrating a higher median NELA score (14.3%, IQR 5-22.4% vs. non-ischaemic group 5.7%, IQR 1.7-14.2%, p = 0.013) and thirty-day mortality (44%, 11/25 vs. 16.1%, 15/93, p = 0.006) than those without ischaemic pathology. Colorectal surgeon involvement in cases without ischaemia (23/93) was associated with a similar 30-day mortality (13.1% colorectal surgeon vs. 17.1% non-colorectal specialist surgeon, p = 0.755) and rate of primary anastomosis (30.4% colorectal surgeon vs. 31.8% non-colorectal specialist surgeon, p = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high mortality rate described highlights a specific group of unwell patients unfit for transfer. Research registration number: researchregistry7101.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of emergency colorectal surgery within a non-colorectal split site service-a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Swan, Emma MacVicar, Kate Carey, Dimitrios Damaskos, Nicholas Ventham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11845-024-03837-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency colorectal surgery carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Subspecialisation and split-site geographically distinct services may lead to critically unwell patients presenting to a non-colorectal specialist centre requiring urgent on-site intervention.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to determine outcomes of this high-risk patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational retrospective study of emergency colorectal laparotomies at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (RIE) between January 2016 and August 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included rate of primary anastomosis, complications and overall mortality. Subgroup analysis of the vascular ischaemia cohort and colorectal surgeon involvement was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighteen patients were included. The median NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) score was 6.4% (IQR 2.5%-16.7%) and the 30-day mortality rate was 22% (26/118). The rate of primary anastomosis was 24.6%. Twenty-five patients had a vascular ischaemic pathology demonstrating a higher median NELA score (14.3%, IQR 5-22.4% vs. non-ischaemic group 5.7%, IQR 1.7-14.2%, p = 0.013) and thirty-day mortality (44%, 11/25 vs. 16.1%, 15/93, p = 0.006) than those without ischaemic pathology. Colorectal surgeon involvement in cases without ischaemia (23/93) was associated with a similar 30-day mortality (13.1% colorectal surgeon vs. 17.1% non-colorectal specialist surgeon, p = 0.755) and rate of primary anastomosis (30.4% colorectal surgeon vs. 31.8% non-colorectal specialist surgeon, p = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high mortality rate described highlights a specific group of unwell patients unfit for transfer. Research registration number: researchregistry7101.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03837-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03837-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊结直肠手术具有很高的发病率和死亡率。亚专科化和不同地理位置的分站服务可能会导致病情危重的患者来到非结直肠专科中心,需要紧急现场干预:该研究对爱丁堡皇家医院(RIE)2016年1月至2020年8月期间的急诊结直肠开腹手术进行了观察性回顾研究。主要结果是 30 天死亡率。次要结果包括初次吻合率、并发症和总死亡率。对血管缺血队列和结直肠外科医生参与情况进行了分组分析:结果:共纳入 118 名患者。NELA(全国紧急腹腔手术审计)评分中位数为 6.4%(IQR 2.5%-16.7%),30 天死亡率为 22%(26/118)。初次吻合率为 24.6%。25例患者有血管缺血性病变,与无缺血性病变的患者相比,NELA评分中位数更高(14.3%,IQR 5-22.4%,非缺血性组为5.7%,IQR 1.7-14.2%,P = 0.013),30天死亡率更高(44%,11/25,16.1%,15/93,P = 0.006)。结直肠外科医生参与的无缺血病例(23/93)的 30 天死亡率(13.1% 的结直肠外科医生 vs. 17.1%的非结直肠外科医生,p = 0.755)和初端吻合率(30.4% 的结直肠外科医生 vs. 31.8% 的非结直肠外科医生,p = 1)相似:结论:所述的高死亡率凸显了不适合转院的特殊不适患者群体。研究注册号:researchregistry7101。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of emergency colorectal surgery within a non-colorectal split site service-a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Emergency colorectal surgery carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Subspecialisation and split-site geographically distinct services may lead to critically unwell patients presenting to a non-colorectal specialist centre requiring urgent on-site intervention.

Aims: This study aims to determine outcomes of this high-risk patient cohort.

Methods: An observational retrospective study of emergency colorectal laparotomies at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (RIE) between January 2016 and August 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included rate of primary anastomosis, complications and overall mortality. Subgroup analysis of the vascular ischaemia cohort and colorectal surgeon involvement was performed.

Results: One hundred and eighteen patients were included. The median NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) score was 6.4% (IQR 2.5%-16.7%) and the 30-day mortality rate was 22% (26/118). The rate of primary anastomosis was 24.6%. Twenty-five patients had a vascular ischaemic pathology demonstrating a higher median NELA score (14.3%, IQR 5-22.4% vs. non-ischaemic group 5.7%, IQR 1.7-14.2%, p = 0.013) and thirty-day mortality (44%, 11/25 vs. 16.1%, 15/93, p = 0.006) than those without ischaemic pathology. Colorectal surgeon involvement in cases without ischaemia (23/93) was associated with a similar 30-day mortality (13.1% colorectal surgeon vs. 17.1% non-colorectal specialist surgeon, p = 0.755) and rate of primary anastomosis (30.4% colorectal surgeon vs. 31.8% non-colorectal specialist surgeon, p = 1).

Conclusions: The high mortality rate described highlights a specific group of unwell patients unfit for transfer. Research registration number: researchregistry7101.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信