食管切除术后早期口服喂养对生活质量的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ming Shi, Mengjie Li, Manyi Fu, Guijuan He
{"title":"食管切除术后早期口服喂养对生活质量的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Ming Shi, Mengjie Li, Manyi Fu, Guijuan He","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2024.2422636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of early oral feeding (EOF) following esophagectomy remains debated. This study evaluates whether postoperative EOF improves patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed across eight databases to identify relevant studies. The effects of continuous variables were assessed using the mean difference (MD). The effects of dichotomous variables were assessed using the relative risk (RR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the analysis. EOF significantly improved postoperative overall quality of life [MD = 9.64, 95% CI (6.11, 13.16), <i>p</i> < 0.001], dysphagia [MD = -7.37, 95% CI (-14.32, -0.42), <i>p</i> = 0.040], and eating difficulty [MD = -6.72, 95% CI (-10.62, -2.82), <i>p</i> < 0.001]. However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative reflux [MD = -5.90, 95% CI (-12.52, 0.73), <i>p</i> = 0.080], esophageal pain [MD = -1.86, 95% CI (-5.51, 1.78), <i>p</i> = 0.320], anastomotic leakage [RR = 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.35), <i>p</i> = 0.290], and pulmonary infection [RR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.15, 1.35), <i>p</i> = 0.150].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EOF after esophagectomy appears to improve patients' quality of life; however, these findings are constrained by the limited number and quality of studies. Further research is needed to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Early Oral Feeding on Quality of Life Following Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Shi, Mengjie Li, Manyi Fu, Guijuan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01635581.2024.2422636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of early oral feeding (EOF) following esophagectomy remains debated. This study evaluates whether postoperative EOF improves patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed across eight databases to identify relevant studies. The effects of continuous variables were assessed using the mean difference (MD). The effects of dichotomous variables were assessed using the relative risk (RR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the analysis. EOF significantly improved postoperative overall quality of life [MD = 9.64, 95% CI (6.11, 13.16), <i>p</i> < 0.001], dysphagia [MD = -7.37, 95% CI (-14.32, -0.42), <i>p</i> = 0.040], and eating difficulty [MD = -6.72, 95% CI (-10.62, -2.82), <i>p</i> < 0.001]. However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative reflux [MD = -5.90, 95% CI (-12.52, 0.73), <i>p</i> = 0.080], esophageal pain [MD = -1.86, 95% CI (-5.51, 1.78), <i>p</i> = 0.320], anastomotic leakage [RR = 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.35), <i>p</i> = 0.290], and pulmonary infection [RR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.15, 1.35), <i>p</i> = 0.150].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EOF after esophagectomy appears to improve patients' quality of life; however, these findings are constrained by the limited number and quality of studies. Further research is needed to validate these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2422636\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2422636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食管切除术后早期口服喂食(EOF)的作用仍存在争议。本研究评估了术后早期口服喂食是否能改善患者的生活质量:在八个数据库中进行了全面搜索,以确定相关研究。连续变量的影响采用平均差(MD)进行评估。采用相对风险(RR)评估二分变量的影响:共有七项研究纳入分析。EOF明显改善了术后总体生活质量[MD = 9.64,95% CI (6.11,13.16),P P = 0.040]、进食困难[MD = -6.72,95% CI (-10.62,-2.82),P P = 0.080]、食管疼痛[MD = -1.86, 95% CI (-5.51, 1.78), p = 0.320]、吻合口漏[RR = 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.35), p = 0.290]和肺部感染[RR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.15, 1.35), p = 0.150]:结论:食管切除术后 EOF 似乎能改善患者的生活质量;但由于研究的数量和质量有限,这些研究结果受到限制。需要进一步研究来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Early Oral Feeding on Quality of Life Following Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The role of early oral feeding (EOF) following esophagectomy remains debated. This study evaluates whether postoperative EOF improves patients' quality of life.

Methods: A comprehensive search was performed across eight databases to identify relevant studies. The effects of continuous variables were assessed using the mean difference (MD). The effects of dichotomous variables were assessed using the relative risk (RR).

Results: Seven studies were included in the analysis. EOF significantly improved postoperative overall quality of life [MD = 9.64, 95% CI (6.11, 13.16), p < 0.001], dysphagia [MD = -7.37, 95% CI (-14.32, -0.42), p = 0.040], and eating difficulty [MD = -6.72, 95% CI (-10.62, -2.82), p < 0.001]. However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative reflux [MD = -5.90, 95% CI (-12.52, 0.73), p = 0.080], esophageal pain [MD = -1.86, 95% CI (-5.51, 1.78), p = 0.320], anastomotic leakage [RR = 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.35), p = 0.290], and pulmonary infection [RR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.15, 1.35), p = 0.150].

Conclusion: EOF after esophagectomy appears to improve patients' quality of life; however, these findings are constrained by the limited number and quality of studies. Further research is needed to validate these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信