{"title":"食管切除术后早期口服喂养对生活质量的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Ming Shi, Mengjie Li, Manyi Fu, Guijuan He","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2024.2422636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of early oral feeding (EOF) following esophagectomy remains debated. This study evaluates whether postoperative EOF improves patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed across eight databases to identify relevant studies. The effects of continuous variables were assessed using the mean difference (MD). The effects of dichotomous variables were assessed using the relative risk (RR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the analysis. EOF significantly improved postoperative overall quality of life [MD = 9.64, 95% CI (6.11, 13.16), <i>p</i> < 0.001], dysphagia [MD = -7.37, 95% CI (-14.32, -0.42), <i>p</i> = 0.040], and eating difficulty [MD = -6.72, 95% CI (-10.62, -2.82), <i>p</i> < 0.001]. However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative reflux [MD = -5.90, 95% CI (-12.52, 0.73), <i>p</i> = 0.080], esophageal pain [MD = -1.86, 95% CI (-5.51, 1.78), <i>p</i> = 0.320], anastomotic leakage [RR = 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.35), <i>p</i> = 0.290], and pulmonary infection [RR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.15, 1.35), <i>p</i> = 0.150].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EOF after esophagectomy appears to improve patients' quality of life; however, these findings are constrained by the limited number and quality of studies. Further research is needed to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Early Oral Feeding on Quality of Life Following Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Shi, Mengjie Li, Manyi Fu, Guijuan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01635581.2024.2422636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of early oral feeding (EOF) following esophagectomy remains debated. This study evaluates whether postoperative EOF improves patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed across eight databases to identify relevant studies. The effects of continuous variables were assessed using the mean difference (MD). The effects of dichotomous variables were assessed using the relative risk (RR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the analysis. EOF significantly improved postoperative overall quality of life [MD = 9.64, 95% CI (6.11, 13.16), <i>p</i> < 0.001], dysphagia [MD = -7.37, 95% CI (-14.32, -0.42), <i>p</i> = 0.040], and eating difficulty [MD = -6.72, 95% CI (-10.62, -2.82), <i>p</i> < 0.001]. However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative reflux [MD = -5.90, 95% CI (-12.52, 0.73), <i>p</i> = 0.080], esophageal pain [MD = -1.86, 95% CI (-5.51, 1.78), <i>p</i> = 0.320], anastomotic leakage [RR = 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.35), <i>p</i> = 0.290], and pulmonary infection [RR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.15, 1.35), <i>p</i> = 0.150].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EOF after esophagectomy appears to improve patients' quality of life; however, these findings are constrained by the limited number and quality of studies. Further research is needed to validate these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2422636\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2422636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:食管切除术后早期口服喂食(EOF)的作用仍存在争议。本研究评估了术后早期口服喂食是否能改善患者的生活质量:在八个数据库中进行了全面搜索,以确定相关研究。连续变量的影响采用平均差(MD)进行评估。采用相对风险(RR)评估二分变量的影响:共有七项研究纳入分析。EOF明显改善了术后总体生活质量[MD = 9.64,95% CI (6.11,13.16),P P = 0.040]、进食困难[MD = -6.72,95% CI (-10.62,-2.82),P P = 0.080]、食管疼痛[MD = -1.86, 95% CI (-5.51, 1.78), p = 0.320]、吻合口漏[RR = 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.35), p = 0.290]和肺部感染[RR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.15, 1.35), p = 0.150]:结论:食管切除术后 EOF 似乎能改善患者的生活质量;但由于研究的数量和质量有限,这些研究结果受到限制。需要进一步研究来验证这些结果。
Effects of Early Oral Feeding on Quality of Life Following Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: The role of early oral feeding (EOF) following esophagectomy remains debated. This study evaluates whether postoperative EOF improves patients' quality of life.
Methods: A comprehensive search was performed across eight databases to identify relevant studies. The effects of continuous variables were assessed using the mean difference (MD). The effects of dichotomous variables were assessed using the relative risk (RR).
Results: Seven studies were included in the analysis. EOF significantly improved postoperative overall quality of life [MD = 9.64, 95% CI (6.11, 13.16), p < 0.001], dysphagia [MD = -7.37, 95% CI (-14.32, -0.42), p = 0.040], and eating difficulty [MD = -6.72, 95% CI (-10.62, -2.82), p < 0.001]. However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative reflux [MD = -5.90, 95% CI (-12.52, 0.73), p = 0.080], esophageal pain [MD = -1.86, 95% CI (-5.51, 1.78), p = 0.320], anastomotic leakage [RR = 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.35), p = 0.290], and pulmonary infection [RR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.15, 1.35), p = 0.150].
Conclusion: EOF after esophagectomy appears to improve patients' quality of life; however, these findings are constrained by the limited number and quality of studies. Further research is needed to validate these results.
期刊介绍:
This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.