驼科动物（骆驼和羊驼）中布氏囊虫的分子流行病学、亚型分布和人畜共患病重要性：全球系统综述与元分析》。

IF 1.9 2区农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Foodborne pathogens and disease Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1089/fpd.2024.0059

Ali Asghari, Fatemeh Hanifeh, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi

{"title":"驼科动物（骆驼和羊驼）中布氏囊虫的分子流行病学、亚型分布和人畜共患病重要性：全球系统综述与元分析》。","authors":"Ali Asghari, Fatemeh Hanifeh, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi","doi":"10.1089/fpd.2024.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on the global epidemiology and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in camelids (camels and alpacas), the present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Utilizing relevant keywords, a thorough search was conducted on four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) with no time constraints up to April 1, 2024. Total estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were subsequently calculated using a random-effects model. Finally, 11 studies with 18 datasets provided the required data. The global prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in camelids was estimated at 22%, with a 95% CI of 17.2-27.6%. Among 1061 camels, the pooled prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was 21.6% (95% CI: 16.6-27.6%) across 5 countries, which was lower than the 23.5% (95% CI: 12.2-43.1%) found in 449 tested alpacas across 3 countries. Camels were found to carry 15 genetically diverse subtypes (STs) of Blastocystis sp. (ST1-ST7, ST10, ST14, ST15, ST21, ST24, ST25, ST26, and ST30). Among these, ST10 exhibited the highest pooled prevalence [five datasets, 38.3% (95% CI: 22.4-57.1%)], followed by ST1 [three datasets, 24% (95% CI: 6-61.2%)] and ST14 [four datasets, 15.2% (95% CI: 6.7-31%)]. Alpacas exhibited three distinct STs (ST5, ST10, and ST14). Among these, ST10 [four datasets, 50.3% (95% CI: 33.3-67.3%)] had the greatest weighted frequency, with ST14 [four datasets, 40.2% (95% CI: 23.8-59.1%)] following closely behind. Of note, 9 zoonotic STs (ST1-ST7, ST10, and ST14) have been identified in camels and 3 in alpacas (ST5, ST10, and ST14) out of the 16 zoonotic STs (ST1-ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16, ST23, ST35, and ST41) of Blastocystis sp. reported to date. Overall, camelids (camels and alpacas) can serve as a diverse reservoir for various Blastocystis sp. STs, potentially contributing to infections in humans, animals, and water sources. Nevertheless, research in this area is somewhat restricted, necessitating careful interpretation of the findings.","PeriodicalId":12333,"journal":{"name":"Foodborne pathogens and disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Epidemiology, Subtype Distribution, and Zoonotic Importance of Blastocystis sp. in Camelids (Camels and Alpacas): A Worldwide Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Asghari, Fatemeh Hanifeh, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/fpd.2024.0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Focusing on the global epidemiology and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in camelids (camels and alpacas), the present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Utilizing relevant keywords, a thorough search was conducted on four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) with no time constraints up to April 1, 2024. Total estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were subsequently calculated using a random-effects model. Finally, 11 studies with 18 datasets provided the required data. The global prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in camelids was estimated at 22%, with a 95% CI of 17.2-27.6%. Among 1061 camels, the pooled prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was 21.6% (95% CI: 16.6-27.6%) across 5 countries, which was lower than the 23.5% (95% CI: 12.2-43.1%) found in 449 tested alpacas across 3 countries. Camels were found to carry 15 genetically diverse subtypes (STs) of Blastocystis sp. (ST1-ST7, ST10, ST14, ST15, ST21, ST24, ST25, ST26, and ST30). Among these, ST10 exhibited the highest pooled prevalence [five datasets, 38.3% (95% CI: 22.4-57.1%)], followed by ST1 [three datasets, 24% (95% CI: 6-61.2%)] and ST14 [four datasets, 15.2% (95% CI: 6.7-31%)]. Alpacas exhibited three distinct STs (ST5, ST10, and ST14). Among these, ST10 [four datasets, 50.3% (95% CI: 33.3-67.3%)] had the greatest weighted frequency, with ST14 [four datasets, 40.2% (95% CI: 23.8-59.1%)] following closely behind. Of note, 9 zoonotic STs (ST1-ST7, ST10, and ST14) have been identified in camels and 3 in alpacas (ST5, ST10, and ST14) out of the 16 zoonotic STs (ST1-ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16, ST23, ST35, and ST41) of Blastocystis sp. reported to date. Overall, camelids (camels and alpacas) can serve as a diverse reservoir for various Blastocystis sp. STs, potentially contributing to infections in humans, animals, and water sources. Nevertheless, research in this area is somewhat restricted, necessitating careful interpretation of the findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foodborne pathogens and disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foodborne pathogens and disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2024.0059\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foodborne pathogens and disease","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2024.0059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析的重点是骆驼（骆驼和羊驼）布氏囊虫的全球流行病学和亚型分布。利用相关关键词，在四个电子数据库（PubMed、Scopus、Google Scholar 和 Web of Science）中进行了全面检索，检索时间不受限制，截止日期为 2024 年 4 月 1 日。随后使用随机效应模型计算了总估计值和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。最后，11 项研究的 18 个数据集提供了所需数据。据估计，Blastocystis sp.在全球骆驼中的流行率为 22%，95% CI 为 17.2-27.6%。在 5 个国家的 1061 头骆驼中，汇总的 Blastocystis sp.感染率为 21.6%（95% CI：16.6-27.6%），低于在 3 个国家的 449 头羊驼中发现的 23.5%（95% CI：12.2-43.1%）。研究发现，骆驼携带有 15 种不同基因亚型（ST）的布氏囊虫（ST1-ST7、ST10、ST14、ST15、ST21、ST24、ST25、ST26 和 ST30）。其中，ST10 的集中流行率最高[5 个数据集，38.3%（95% CI：22.4-57.1%）]，其次是 ST1 [3 个数据集，24%（95% CI：6-61.2%）] 和 ST14 [4 个数据集，15.2%（95% CI：6.7-31%）]。羊驼表现出三种不同的 ST（ST5、ST10 和 ST14）。其中，ST10 [4 个数据集，50.3%（95% CI：33.3-67.3%）] 的加权频率最高，ST14 [4 个数据集，40.2%（95% CI：23.8-59.1%）] 紧随其后。值得注意的是，在迄今为止报道的 16 种人畜共通的 Blastocystis sp.ST（ST1-ST10、ST12、ST14、ST16、ST23、ST35 和 ST41）中，9 种（ST1-ST7、ST10 和 ST14）在骆驼中被发现，3 种（ST5、ST10 和 ST14）在羊驼中被发现。总体而言，驼科动物（骆驼和羊驼）可作为各种布氏囊孢子丝菌 ST 的储藏库，有可能导致人类、动物和水源的感染。然而，这一领域的研究受到一定限制，因此有必要对研究结果进行仔细解读。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Molecular Epidemiology, Subtype Distribution, and Zoonotic Importance of Blastocystis sp. in Camelids (Camels and Alpacas): A Worldwide Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Focusing on the global epidemiology and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in camelids (camels and alpacas), the present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Utilizing relevant keywords, a thorough search was conducted on four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) with no time constraints up to April 1, 2024. Total estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were subsequently calculated using a random-effects model. Finally, 11 studies with 18 datasets provided the required data. The global prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in camelids was estimated at 22%, with a 95% CI of 17.2-27.6%. Among 1061 camels, the pooled prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was 21.6% (95% CI: 16.6-27.6%) across 5 countries, which was lower than the 23.5% (95% CI: 12.2-43.1%) found in 449 tested alpacas across 3 countries. Camels were found to carry 15 genetically diverse subtypes (STs) of Blastocystis sp. (ST1-ST7, ST10, ST14, ST15, ST21, ST24, ST25, ST26, and ST30). Among these, ST10 exhibited the highest pooled prevalence [five datasets, 38.3% (95% CI: 22.4-57.1%)], followed by ST1 [three datasets, 24% (95% CI: 6-61.2%)] and ST14 [four datasets, 15.2% (95% CI: 6.7-31%)]. Alpacas exhibited three distinct STs (ST5, ST10, and ST14). Among these, ST10 [four datasets, 50.3% (95% CI: 33.3-67.3%)] had the greatest weighted frequency, with ST14 [four datasets, 40.2% (95% CI: 23.8-59.1%)] following closely behind. Of note, 9 zoonotic STs (ST1-ST7, ST10, and ST14) have been identified in camels and 3 in alpacas (ST5, ST10, and ST14) out of the 16 zoonotic STs (ST1-ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16, ST23, ST35, and ST41) of Blastocystis sp. reported to date. Overall, camelids (camels and alpacas) can serve as a diverse reservoir for various Blastocystis sp. STs, potentially contributing to infections in humans, animals, and water sources. Nevertheless, research in this area is somewhat restricted, necessitating careful interpretation of the findings.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Foodborne pathogens and disease 医学-食品科技

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

3.60%

发文量

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： Foodborne Pathogens and Disease is one of the most inclusive scientific publications on the many disciplines that contribute to food safety. Spanning an array of issues from "farm-to-fork," the Journal bridges the gap between science and policy to reduce the burden of foodborne illness worldwide. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease coverage includes: Agroterrorism Safety of organically grown and genetically modified foods Emerging pathogens Emergence of drug resistance Methods and technology for rapid and accurate detection Strategies to destroy or control foodborne pathogens Novel strategies for the prevention and control of plant and animal diseases that impact food safety Biosecurity issues and the implications of new regulatory guidelines Impact of changing lifestyles and consumer demands on food safety.