Bryce N Balmain, Andrew R Tomlinson, Josh T Goh, James P MacNamara, Denis J Wakeham, Tiffany L Brazile, Michael G Leahy, Kevin C Lutz, Linda S Hynan, Benjamin D Levine, Satyam Sarma, Tony G Babb
{"title":"射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者肺气体交换与运动性肺动脉高压的关系。","authors":"Bryce N Balmain, Andrew R Tomlinson, Josh T Goh, James P MacNamara, Denis J Wakeham, Tiffany L Brazile, Michael G Leahy, Kevin C Lutz, Linda S Hynan, Benjamin D Levine, Satyam Sarma, Tony G Babb","doi":"10.1183/13993003.00722-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise pulmonary hypertension (ePH), defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)/cardiac output (Qc) slope >3 WU during exercise, is common in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the pulmonary gas exchange-related effects of an exaggerated ePH (EePH) response are not well-defined, especially in relation to dyspnea on exertion (DOE) and exercise intolerance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>48 HFpEF patients underwent invasive (pulmonary and radial artery catheters) constant-load (20W) and maximal incremental cycle testing. Hemodynamic measurements (mPAP and Qc), arterial blood and expired gases, and ratings of breathlessness (RPB, Borg 0-10) were obtained. The mPAP/Qc slope was calculated from rest-to-20W. Those with a mPAP/Qc slope >4.2 (median) were classified as HFpEF+EePH (n=24) and those with a mPAP/Qc slope <4.2 were classified as HFpEF (without EePH) (n=24). The A-aDO<sub>2</sub>, V<sub>D</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> (Bohr equation), and the V<sub>E</sub>/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (from rest-to-20W) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PaO<sub>2</sub> was lower (p=0.03), and V<sub>D</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> was higher (p=0.03) at peak exercise in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF. A-aDO<sub>2</sub> was similar at peak exercise between groups (p=0.14); however, HFpEF+EePH achieved the peak A-aDO<sub>2</sub> at a lower peak work rate (p<0.01). The V<sub>E</sub>/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope was higher in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF (p=0.01). RPB was ≥1-unit higher at 20W and VO<sub>2peak</sub> was lower (p<0.01) in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that EePH contributes to pulmonary gas exchange impairments during exercise by causing a V/Q mismatch that provokes both ventilatory inefficiency and hypoxemia, both of which seem to contribute to DOE and exercise intolerance in patients with HFpEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary gas exchange in relation to exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.\",\"authors\":\"Bryce N Balmain, Andrew R Tomlinson, Josh T Goh, James P MacNamara, Denis J Wakeham, Tiffany L Brazile, Michael G Leahy, Kevin C Lutz, Linda S Hynan, Benjamin D Levine, Satyam Sarma, Tony G Babb\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.00722-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise pulmonary hypertension (ePH), defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)/cardiac output (Qc) slope >3 WU during exercise, is common in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the pulmonary gas exchange-related effects of an exaggerated ePH (EePH) response are not well-defined, especially in relation to dyspnea on exertion (DOE) and exercise intolerance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>48 HFpEF patients underwent invasive (pulmonary and radial artery catheters) constant-load (20W) and maximal incremental cycle testing. Hemodynamic measurements (mPAP and Qc), arterial blood and expired gases, and ratings of breathlessness (RPB, Borg 0-10) were obtained. The mPAP/Qc slope was calculated from rest-to-20W. Those with a mPAP/Qc slope >4.2 (median) were classified as HFpEF+EePH (n=24) and those with a mPAP/Qc slope <4.2 were classified as HFpEF (without EePH) (n=24). The A-aDO<sub>2</sub>, V<sub>D</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> (Bohr equation), and the V<sub>E</sub>/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (from rest-to-20W) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PaO<sub>2</sub> was lower (p=0.03), and V<sub>D</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> was higher (p=0.03) at peak exercise in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF. A-aDO<sub>2</sub> was similar at peak exercise between groups (p=0.14); however, HFpEF+EePH achieved the peak A-aDO<sub>2</sub> at a lower peak work rate (p<0.01). The V<sub>E</sub>/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope was higher in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF (p=0.01). RPB was ≥1-unit higher at 20W and VO<sub>2peak</sub> was lower (p<0.01) in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that EePH contributes to pulmonary gas exchange impairments during exercise by causing a V/Q mismatch that provokes both ventilatory inefficiency and hypoxemia, both of which seem to contribute to DOE and exercise intolerance in patients with HFpEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00722-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00722-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pulmonary gas exchange in relation to exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Background: Exercise pulmonary hypertension (ePH), defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)/cardiac output (Qc) slope >3 WU during exercise, is common in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the pulmonary gas exchange-related effects of an exaggerated ePH (EePH) response are not well-defined, especially in relation to dyspnea on exertion (DOE) and exercise intolerance.
Methods: 48 HFpEF patients underwent invasive (pulmonary and radial artery catheters) constant-load (20W) and maximal incremental cycle testing. Hemodynamic measurements (mPAP and Qc), arterial blood and expired gases, and ratings of breathlessness (RPB, Borg 0-10) were obtained. The mPAP/Qc slope was calculated from rest-to-20W. Those with a mPAP/Qc slope >4.2 (median) were classified as HFpEF+EePH (n=24) and those with a mPAP/Qc slope <4.2 were classified as HFpEF (without EePH) (n=24). The A-aDO2, VD/VT (Bohr equation), and the VE/VCO2 slope (from rest-to-20W) were calculated.
Results: PaO2 was lower (p=0.03), and VD/VT was higher (p=0.03) at peak exercise in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF. A-aDO2 was similar at peak exercise between groups (p=0.14); however, HFpEF+EePH achieved the peak A-aDO2 at a lower peak work rate (p<0.01). The VE/VCO2 slope was higher in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF (p=0.01). RPB was ≥1-unit higher at 20W and VO2peak was lower (p<0.01) in HFpEF+EePH compared with HFpEF.
Conclusions: These data suggest that EePH contributes to pulmonary gas exchange impairments during exercise by causing a V/Q mismatch that provokes both ventilatory inefficiency and hypoxemia, both of which seem to contribute to DOE and exercise intolerance in patients with HFpEF.
期刊介绍:
The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.