通过创新计划改善儿童康复服务质量和体验:对 "光明想法 "计划的发展评估。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329241297910
Meaghan Reitzel, Emily Cheung, Cynthia Lennon, Brendan Wylie-Toal, Michelle Phoenix
{"title":"通过创新计划改善儿童康复服务质量和体验:对 \"光明想法 \"计划的发展评估。","authors":"Meaghan Reitzel, Emily Cheung, Cynthia Lennon, Brendan Wylie-Toal, Michelle Phoenix","doi":"10.1177/11786329241297910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence-informed practice (EIP) is a widely accepted approach to providing rehabilitation services, however there are barriers to implementation. Bright Ideas is an innovative program developed by KidsAbility's Rocket Discovery Centre, aiming enhance uptake of EIP through incubating ideas identified by KidsAbility staff linked to organizational priorities of enhancing service access and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate Bright Ideas by identifying perceived successes and challenges associated with the program with the aim of supporting clinical innovation and the adoption of evidence-informed practices in children's rehabilitation centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A developmental evaluation approach was utilized to complete a real-time evaluation of Bright Ideas. Bright Ideas program materials were reviewed to describe the program. A focus group and interview were conducted with staff who led Bright Ideas projects (<i>n</i> = 7) to gain insight into their experiences. Additionally, interviews were conducted with the program coordinators (<i>n</i> = 2) to understand the evolution of the program. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successes that drive the Bright Ideas program and roadblocks it has encountered were identified across three dimensions: the personal level (involving Bright Ideas project leads), the programmatic level (focusing on the Bright Ideas program), and the organizational level (pertaining to KidsAbility as a whole). Key roadblocks included a lack of knowledge about the program organizationally, restricted time resources, competing organizational priorities, and an absence of infrastructure to scale ideas from Bright Ideas into the organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bright Ideas is an innovative program aiming to make impactful change by enabling staff to lead implementation-driven projects. Our findings highlight many successes of the program and use the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel to make recommendations to support its sustained implementation at KidsAbility.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"17 ","pages":"11786329241297910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Children's Rehabilitation Service Quality and Experience Through Innovative Programming: A Developmental Evaluation of the Bright Ideas Program.\",\"authors\":\"Meaghan Reitzel, Emily Cheung, Cynthia Lennon, Brendan Wylie-Toal, Michelle Phoenix\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11786329241297910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence-informed practice (EIP) is a widely accepted approach to providing rehabilitation services, however there are barriers to implementation. Bright Ideas is an innovative program developed by KidsAbility's Rocket Discovery Centre, aiming enhance uptake of EIP through incubating ideas identified by KidsAbility staff linked to organizational priorities of enhancing service access and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate Bright Ideas by identifying perceived successes and challenges associated with the program with the aim of supporting clinical innovation and the adoption of evidence-informed practices in children's rehabilitation centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A developmental evaluation approach was utilized to complete a real-time evaluation of Bright Ideas. Bright Ideas program materials were reviewed to describe the program. A focus group and interview were conducted with staff who led Bright Ideas projects (<i>n</i> = 7) to gain insight into their experiences. Additionally, interviews were conducted with the program coordinators (<i>n</i> = 2) to understand the evolution of the program. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successes that drive the Bright Ideas program and roadblocks it has encountered were identified across three dimensions: the personal level (involving Bright Ideas project leads), the programmatic level (focusing on the Bright Ideas program), and the organizational level (pertaining to KidsAbility as a whole). Key roadblocks included a lack of knowledge about the program organizationally, restricted time resources, competing organizational priorities, and an absence of infrastructure to scale ideas from Bright Ideas into the organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bright Ideas is an innovative program aiming to make impactful change by enabling staff to lead implementation-driven projects. Our findings highlight many successes of the program and use the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel to make recommendations to support its sustained implementation at KidsAbility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"11786329241297910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329241297910\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329241297910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:循证实践(EIP)是一种广为接受的提供康复服务的方法,但在实施过程中却存在障碍。Bright Ideas是由KidsAbility的火箭探索中心开发的一项创新计划,旨在通过孵化KidsAbility员工提出的与提高服务可及性和成果的组织优先事项相关的想法,提高EIP的采用率:评估 "光明点子 "计划,确定与该计划相关的成功经验和挑战,以支持儿童康复中心的临床创新和采用循证实践:方法: 采用发展性评估方法完成对 "光明点子 "计划的实时评估。对 "光明点子 "计划的材料进行了审查,以描述该计划。对领导 "光明点子 "项目的员工(7 人)进行了焦点小组讨论和访谈,以深入了解他们的经验。此外,还对项目协调员(n = 2)进行了访谈,以了解项目的演变情况。采用定性内容分析法对数据进行了分析:从以下三个层面确定了推动 "光明点子 "计划的成功之处和遇到的障碍:个人层面(涉及 "光明点子 "项目负责人)、计划层面(关注 "光明点子 "计划)和组织层面(涉及整个 KidsAbility)。主要障碍包括组织对该计划缺乏了解、时间资源有限、组织优先事项相互竞争,以及缺乏将 "光明点子 "的想法推广到组织的基础设施:结论:"光明点子 "是一项创新计划,旨在通过让员工领导实施驱动型项目来实现有影响力的变革。我们的研究结果强调了该计划的许多成功之处,并利用 "理论领域框架"(Theoretical Domains Framework)和 "行为改变轮"(Behaviour Change Wheel)提出了建议,以支持该计划在 KidsAbility 的持续实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Children's Rehabilitation Service Quality and Experience Through Innovative Programming: A Developmental Evaluation of the Bright Ideas Program.

Introduction: Evidence-informed practice (EIP) is a widely accepted approach to providing rehabilitation services, however there are barriers to implementation. Bright Ideas is an innovative program developed by KidsAbility's Rocket Discovery Centre, aiming enhance uptake of EIP through incubating ideas identified by KidsAbility staff linked to organizational priorities of enhancing service access and outcomes.

Objectives: To evaluate Bright Ideas by identifying perceived successes and challenges associated with the program with the aim of supporting clinical innovation and the adoption of evidence-informed practices in children's rehabilitation centres.

Methods: A developmental evaluation approach was utilized to complete a real-time evaluation of Bright Ideas. Bright Ideas program materials were reviewed to describe the program. A focus group and interview were conducted with staff who led Bright Ideas projects (n = 7) to gain insight into their experiences. Additionally, interviews were conducted with the program coordinators (n = 2) to understand the evolution of the program. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Successes that drive the Bright Ideas program and roadblocks it has encountered were identified across three dimensions: the personal level (involving Bright Ideas project leads), the programmatic level (focusing on the Bright Ideas program), and the organizational level (pertaining to KidsAbility as a whole). Key roadblocks included a lack of knowledge about the program organizationally, restricted time resources, competing organizational priorities, and an absence of infrastructure to scale ideas from Bright Ideas into the organization.

Conclusions: Bright Ideas is an innovative program aiming to make impactful change by enabling staff to lead implementation-driven projects. Our findings highlight many successes of the program and use the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel to make recommendations to support its sustained implementation at KidsAbility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信