虚弱还是复原力?用基于危害和累积表型的方法辨别中世纪伦敦健康不平等的信号

IF 11.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Samantha L. Yaussy, Kathryn E. Marklein, Sharon N. DeWitte, Douglas E. Crews
{"title":"虚弱还是复原力?用基于危害和累积表型的方法辨别中世纪伦敦健康不平等的信号","authors":"Samantha L. Yaussy, Kathryn E. Marklein, Sharon N. DeWitte, Douglas E. Crews","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.adq5703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bioarchaeology uses human skeletal remains to reconstruct varied experiences of individuals and populations in the past, including patterns of health across time periods and cultural contexts. In the past three decades, bioarchaeological studies have highlighted the concept of “frailty,” operationalizing it as increased risk of mortality or cumulative phenotypes. Using data from medieval London cemeteries, we integrate these two approaches to frailty in past populations. First, we estimate the risks of mortality and survivorship (hazard and survival analyses) associated with 10 biomarkers and use these results to construct population-specific frailty and resilience indices. Then, we apply the indices to adult individuals to explore frailty and resilience differentials between males and females in medieval London. Findings suggest that the male-female morbidity-mortality paradox observed in modern populations may not have existed in this context, which may be explained by preferential cultural buffering of men in this patriarchal, urban setting.","PeriodicalId":21609,"journal":{"name":"Science Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty or resilience? Hazard-based and cumulative phenotype approaches to discerning signals of health inequality in medieval London\",\"authors\":\"Samantha L. Yaussy, Kathryn E. Marklein, Sharon N. DeWitte, Douglas E. Crews\",\"doi\":\"10.1126/sciadv.adq5703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bioarchaeology uses human skeletal remains to reconstruct varied experiences of individuals and populations in the past, including patterns of health across time periods and cultural contexts. In the past three decades, bioarchaeological studies have highlighted the concept of “frailty,” operationalizing it as increased risk of mortality or cumulative phenotypes. Using data from medieval London cemeteries, we integrate these two approaches to frailty in past populations. First, we estimate the risks of mortality and survivorship (hazard and survival analyses) associated with 10 biomarkers and use these results to construct population-specific frailty and resilience indices. Then, we apply the indices to adult individuals to explore frailty and resilience differentials between males and females in medieval London. Findings suggest that the male-female morbidity-mortality paradox observed in modern populations may not have existed in this context, which may be explained by preferential cultural buffering of men in this patriarchal, urban setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq5703\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq5703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物考古学利用人类骨骼遗骸来重建个人和人群在过去的各种经历,包括不同时期和文化背景下的健康模式。在过去的三十年里,生物考古学研究强调了 "虚弱 "这一概念,并将其操作化为死亡风险增加或累积性表型。利用中世纪伦敦墓地的数据,我们整合了这两种方法来研究过去人群的虚弱状况。首先,我们估算了与 10 个生物标志物相关的死亡和存活风险(危险和存活分析),并利用这些结果构建了特定人群的虚弱和恢复力指数。然后,我们将这些指数应用于成年个体,以探索中世纪伦敦男性和女性之间的虚弱和恢复力差异。研究结果表明,在现代人口中观察到的男性-女性发病率-死亡率悖论在这种情况下可能并不存在,这可能是由于在这种父权制的城市环境中,男性在文化上更倾向于缓冲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frailty or resilience? Hazard-based and cumulative phenotype approaches to discerning signals of health inequality in medieval London
Bioarchaeology uses human skeletal remains to reconstruct varied experiences of individuals and populations in the past, including patterns of health across time periods and cultural contexts. In the past three decades, bioarchaeological studies have highlighted the concept of “frailty,” operationalizing it as increased risk of mortality or cumulative phenotypes. Using data from medieval London cemeteries, we integrate these two approaches to frailty in past populations. First, we estimate the risks of mortality and survivorship (hazard and survival analyses) associated with 10 biomarkers and use these results to construct population-specific frailty and resilience indices. Then, we apply the indices to adult individuals to explore frailty and resilience differentials between males and females in medieval London. Findings suggest that the male-female morbidity-mortality paradox observed in modern populations may not have existed in this context, which may be explained by preferential cultural buffering of men in this patriarchal, urban setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science Advances
Science Advances 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1937
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Science Advances, an open-access journal by AAAS, publishes impactful research in diverse scientific areas. It aims for fair, fast, and expert peer review, providing freely accessible research to readers. Led by distinguished scientists, the journal supports AAAS's mission by extending Science magazine's capacity to identify and promote significant advances. Evolving digital publishing technologies play a crucial role in advancing AAAS's global mission for science communication and benefitting humankind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信