Zoonati "与 "践踏认识论者"：关于 SARS-CoV-2 起源的有争议的在线宣传活动中的科学认同

IF 2.9 2区社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Social Studies of Science Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1177/03063127241294028

Lynn Horton

{"title":"Zoonati \"与 \"践踏认识论者\"：关于 SARS-CoV-2 起源的有争议的在线宣传活动中的科学认同","authors":"Lynn Horton","doi":"10.1177/03063127241294028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how science is mobilized as a collective identity, normative ideal, and instrumental tactic in contentious online global advocacy campaigns on the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It incorporates qualitative analysis of over 2300 public Twitter postings by core zoonosis and lab origin proponents who identify as scientists. These online exchanges provide a real-time window into how the collective identity of scientist is constructed and mobilized as a master frame. Similarly, this paper explores ways in which the boundaries of science, conspiracy, and politics are set and contested in a context of complex and fast-moving global events.","PeriodicalId":51152,"journal":{"name":"Social Studies of Science","volume":"158 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Zoonati’ vs. ‘epistemic tresspasers’: Science identity in contentious online advocacy campaigns on the origins of SARS-CoV-2\",\"authors\":\"Lynn Horton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03063127241294028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores how science is mobilized as a collective identity, normative ideal, and instrumental tactic in contentious online global advocacy campaigns on the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It incorporates qualitative analysis of over 2300 public Twitter postings by core zoonosis and lab origin proponents who identify as scientists. These online exchanges provide a real-time window into how the collective identity of scientist is constructed and mobilized as a master frame. Similarly, this paper explores ways in which the boundaries of science, conspiracy, and politics are set and contested in a context of complex and fast-moving global events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Studies of Science\",\"volume\":\"158 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Studies of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127241294028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Studies of Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127241294028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在有关 SARS-CoV-2 病毒起源的有争议的全球在线宣传活动中，科学是如何作为一种集体身份、规范性理想和工具性策略被动员起来的。本研究结合了对 2300 多条推特公开帖子的定性分析，这些帖子由以科学家身份自居的人畜共患病和实验室起源的核心支持者发布。这些在线交流为我们提供了一个实时窗口，让我们了解科学家这一集体身份是如何被构建和调动为一个主框架的。同样，本文还探讨了在复杂、快速发展的全球事件背景下，科学、阴谋和政治的界限是如何设定和争夺的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

‘Zoonati’ vs. ‘epistemic tresspasers’: Science identity in contentious online advocacy campaigns on the origins of SARS-CoV-2

This article explores how science is mobilized as a collective identity, normative ideal, and instrumental tactic in contentious online global advocacy campaigns on the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It incorporates qualitative analysis of over 2300 public Twitter postings by core zoonosis and lab origin proponents who identify as scientists. These online exchanges provide a real-time window into how the collective identity of scientist is constructed and mobilized as a master frame. Similarly, this paper explores ways in which the boundaries of science, conspiracy, and politics are set and contested in a context of complex and fast-moving global events.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social Studies of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

6.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Social Studies of Science is an international peer reviewed journal that encourages submissions of original research on science, technology and medicine. The journal is multidisciplinary, publishing work from a range of fields including: political science, sociology, economics, history, philosophy, psychology social anthropology, legal and educational disciplines. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)