Arianis Tatiana Ramírez, David Mesher, Armando Baena, Yuli Salgado, Elena Kasamatsu, Carmen Cristaldo, Rodrigo Álvarez, Freddy David Rojas, Katherine Ramírez, Julieta Guyot, Odessa Henríquez, Hans González Palma, Bettsy Flores, Jhaquelin Peñaranda, María José Vero, Isabel Robinson, Mary Luz Rol, Guillermo Rodríguez, Carolina Terán, Annabelle Ferrera, María Alejandra Picconi, Alejandro Calderon, Laura Mendoza, Carolina Wiesner, Maribel Almonte, Rolando Herrero
{"title":"拉丁美洲 HPV 阳性知识对宫颈细胞学检查结果的影响","authors":"Arianis Tatiana Ramírez, David Mesher, Armando Baena, Yuli Salgado, Elena Kasamatsu, Carmen Cristaldo, Rodrigo Álvarez, Freddy David Rojas, Katherine Ramírez, Julieta Guyot, Odessa Henríquez, Hans González Palma, Bettsy Flores, Jhaquelin Peñaranda, María José Vero, Isabel Robinson, Mary Luz Rol, Guillermo Rodríguez, Carolina Terán, Annabelle Ferrera, María Alejandra Picconi, Alejandro Calderon, Laura Mendoza, Carolina Wiesner, Maribel Almonte, Rolando Herrero","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Cervical cytology is recommended by WHO as a triage option in HPV-based cervical cancer screening programmes. We assessed the performance of cytology to detect CIN3+ without and with knowledge of HPV positivity. Methods Women were screened with cytology and HPV across ESTAMPA study centres in Latin America. Screen-positives were referred to colposcopy with biopsy and treatment as needed. Cytology was initially interpreted without knowing HPV results. A subset of cytologies from HPV-positive women were re-interpreted at the same laboratories, with knowledge of HPV status, blinded to previous cytology and histological diagnosis. Performance indicators for cytology to detect CIN3+ without and with knowledge of HPV positivity were estimated. Findings A total of 4,087 women were included, of which 490 had histologically confirmed CIN3 + (455 CIN3 and 35 cancers). Cytology sensitivity without knowledge of HPV positivity for CIN3+ was 47.2% (95% CI: 42.5-51.9), whereas with knowledge of HPV positivity, the sensitivity was higher (58.9%, 95% CI: 54.2-63.5), p < .0001. The specificity without knowledge of HPV was 89.4% (95% CI: 88.2-90.5), while with knowledge of HPV positivity was 78.9% (95% CI: 77.4-80.4), p < .0001. Performance estimates varied by study centre for cytology without knowing the HPV positivity, (range from 32.8% to 61.5% for sensitivity; range 80.7% to 98.6% for specificity). Similarly, performance varied with knowledge of HPV positivity (36.1% to 93.4% for sensitivity; 39.6% to 98.6% for specificity). Conclusion The increase in sensitivity of cytology with HPV knowledge was limited and highly variable, reinforcing the need for alternative triage methods to support cervical cancer elimination goals.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of knowledge of HPV positivity on cervical cytology performance in latin america\",\"authors\":\"Arianis Tatiana Ramírez, David Mesher, Armando Baena, Yuli Salgado, Elena Kasamatsu, Carmen Cristaldo, Rodrigo Álvarez, Freddy David Rojas, Katherine Ramírez, Julieta Guyot, Odessa Henríquez, Hans González Palma, Bettsy Flores, Jhaquelin Peñaranda, María José Vero, Isabel Robinson, Mary Luz Rol, Guillermo Rodríguez, Carolina Terán, Annabelle Ferrera, María Alejandra Picconi, Alejandro Calderon, Laura Mendoza, Carolina Wiesner, Maribel Almonte, Rolando Herrero\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djae283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Cervical cytology is recommended by WHO as a triage option in HPV-based cervical cancer screening programmes. We assessed the performance of cytology to detect CIN3+ without and with knowledge of HPV positivity. Methods Women were screened with cytology and HPV across ESTAMPA study centres in Latin America. Screen-positives were referred to colposcopy with biopsy and treatment as needed. Cytology was initially interpreted without knowing HPV results. A subset of cytologies from HPV-positive women were re-interpreted at the same laboratories, with knowledge of HPV status, blinded to previous cytology and histological diagnosis. Performance indicators for cytology to detect CIN3+ without and with knowledge of HPV positivity were estimated. Findings A total of 4,087 women were included, of which 490 had histologically confirmed CIN3 + (455 CIN3 and 35 cancers). Cytology sensitivity without knowledge of HPV positivity for CIN3+ was 47.2% (95% CI: 42.5-51.9), whereas with knowledge of HPV positivity, the sensitivity was higher (58.9%, 95% CI: 54.2-63.5), p < .0001. The specificity without knowledge of HPV was 89.4% (95% CI: 88.2-90.5), while with knowledge of HPV positivity was 78.9% (95% CI: 77.4-80.4), p < .0001. Performance estimates varied by study centre for cytology without knowing the HPV positivity, (range from 32.8% to 61.5% for sensitivity; range 80.7% to 98.6% for specificity). Similarly, performance varied with knowledge of HPV positivity (36.1% to 93.4% for sensitivity; 39.6% to 98.6% for specificity). Conclusion The increase in sensitivity of cytology with HPV knowledge was limited and highly variable, reinforcing the need for alternative triage methods to support cervical cancer elimination goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of knowledge of HPV positivity on cervical cytology performance in latin america
Background Cervical cytology is recommended by WHO as a triage option in HPV-based cervical cancer screening programmes. We assessed the performance of cytology to detect CIN3+ without and with knowledge of HPV positivity. Methods Women were screened with cytology and HPV across ESTAMPA study centres in Latin America. Screen-positives were referred to colposcopy with biopsy and treatment as needed. Cytology was initially interpreted without knowing HPV results. A subset of cytologies from HPV-positive women were re-interpreted at the same laboratories, with knowledge of HPV status, blinded to previous cytology and histological diagnosis. Performance indicators for cytology to detect CIN3+ without and with knowledge of HPV positivity were estimated. Findings A total of 4,087 women were included, of which 490 had histologically confirmed CIN3 + (455 CIN3 and 35 cancers). Cytology sensitivity without knowledge of HPV positivity for CIN3+ was 47.2% (95% CI: 42.5-51.9), whereas with knowledge of HPV positivity, the sensitivity was higher (58.9%, 95% CI: 54.2-63.5), p < .0001. The specificity without knowledge of HPV was 89.4% (95% CI: 88.2-90.5), while with knowledge of HPV positivity was 78.9% (95% CI: 77.4-80.4), p < .0001. Performance estimates varied by study centre for cytology without knowing the HPV positivity, (range from 32.8% to 61.5% for sensitivity; range 80.7% to 98.6% for specificity). Similarly, performance varied with knowledge of HPV positivity (36.1% to 93.4% for sensitivity; 39.6% to 98.6% for specificity). Conclusion The increase in sensitivity of cytology with HPV knowledge was limited and highly variable, reinforcing the need for alternative triage methods to support cervical cancer elimination goals.