不同人群的痴呆症风险评分

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Lisa Kiani
{"title":"不同人群的痴呆症风险评分","authors":"Lisa Kiani","doi":"10.1038/s41582-024-01039-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A recent analysis of dementia risk scores across diverse populations found that the validity of scores can differ between ethnic groups. The widely investigated Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) risk score, which estimates 20-year dementia risk at midlife on the basis of age, sex, education, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, cholesterol level and physical activity, was compared with a modified version (mCAIDE) that includes self-reported information on sociodemographic characteristics, personal and family medical history and mood. Higher CAIDE scores were associated with increased risk of dementia in non-Latinx White, Latinx, and Asian Americans, but not Black Americans, whereas mCAIDE scores were associated with risk in all groups. The findings highlight the need to evaluate and revise risk score methods to suit the specific racial and ethnic make-up of the studied population.</p>","PeriodicalId":28,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry Biochemistry","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dementia risk scores in diverse populations\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Kiani\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41582-024-01039-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A recent analysis of dementia risk scores across diverse populations found that the validity of scores can differ between ethnic groups. The widely investigated Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) risk score, which estimates 20-year dementia risk at midlife on the basis of age, sex, education, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, cholesterol level and physical activity, was compared with a modified version (mCAIDE) that includes self-reported information on sociodemographic characteristics, personal and family medical history and mood. Higher CAIDE scores were associated with increased risk of dementia in non-Latinx White, Latinx, and Asian Americans, but not Black Americans, whereas mCAIDE scores were associated with risk in all groups. The findings highlight the need to evaluate and revise risk score methods to suit the specific racial and ethnic make-up of the studied population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":28,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemistry Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemistry Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-024-01039-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-024-01039-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近一项对不同人群痴呆症风险评分的分析发现,评分的有效性在不同种族群体之间可能存在差异。被广泛研究的心血管风险因素、老龄化和痴呆症发病率(CAIDE)风险评分是根据年龄、性别、教育程度、收缩压、体重指数、胆固醇水平和体力活动来估算中年20年痴呆症风险的,该评分与修改版(mCAIDE)进行了比较,后者包括自我报告的社会人口特征、个人和家庭病史以及情绪等信息。CAIDE 分数越高,非拉丁裔白人、拉丁裔和亚裔美国人患痴呆症的风险就越高,而美国黑人则不然,而 mCAIDE 分数则与所有群体的痴呆症风险有关。研究结果突出表明,有必要对风险评分方法进行评估和修订,以适应所研究人群的特定种族和民族构成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dementia risk scores in diverse populations

A recent analysis of dementia risk scores across diverse populations found that the validity of scores can differ between ethnic groups. The widely investigated Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) risk score, which estimates 20-year dementia risk at midlife on the basis of age, sex, education, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, cholesterol level and physical activity, was compared with a modified version (mCAIDE) that includes self-reported information on sociodemographic characteristics, personal and family medical history and mood. Higher CAIDE scores were associated with increased risk of dementia in non-Latinx White, Latinx, and Asian Americans, but not Black Americans, whereas mCAIDE scores were associated with risk in all groups. The findings highlight the need to evaluate and revise risk score methods to suit the specific racial and ethnic make-up of the studied population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biochemistry Biochemistry
Biochemistry Biochemistry 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
336
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Biochemistry provides an international forum for publishing exceptional, rigorous, high-impact research across all of biological chemistry. This broad scope includes studies on the chemical, physical, mechanistic, and/or structural basis of biological or cell function, and encompasses the fields of chemical biology, synthetic biology, disease biology, cell biology, nucleic acid biology, neuroscience, structural biology, and biophysics. In addition to traditional Research Articles, Biochemistry also publishes Communications, Viewpoints, and Perspectives, as well as From the Bench articles that report new methods of particular interest to the biological chemistry community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信