用于诊断中枢神经系统感染的临床元基因组下一代测序检验的七年性能表现

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Patrick Benoit, Noah Brazer, Mikael de Lorenzi-Tognon, Emily Kelly, Venice Servellita, Miriam Oseguera, Jenny Nguyen, Jack Tang, Charles Omura, Jessica Streithorst, Melissa Hillberg, Danielle Ingebrigtsen, Kelsey Zorn, Michael R. Wilson, Tim Blicharz, Amy P. Wong, Brian O’Donovan, Brad Murray, Steve Miller, Charles Y. Chiu
{"title":"用于诊断中枢神经系统感染的临床元基因组下一代测序检验的七年性能表现","authors":"Patrick Benoit, Noah Brazer, Mikael de Lorenzi-Tognon, Emily Kelly, Venice Servellita, Miriam Oseguera, Jenny Nguyen, Jack Tang, Charles Omura, Jessica Streithorst, Melissa Hillberg, Danielle Ingebrigtsen, Kelsey Zorn, Michael R. Wilson, Tim Blicharz, Amy P. Wong, Brian O’Donovan, Brad Murray, Steve Miller, Charles Y. Chiu","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03275-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an agnostic method for broad-based diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections. Here we analyzed the 7-year performance of clinical CSF mNGS testing of 4,828 samples from June 2016 to April 2023 performed by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) clinical microbiology laboratory. Overall, mNGS testing detected 797 organisms from 697 (14.4%) of 4,828 samples, consisting of 363 (45.5%) DNA viruses, 211 (26.4%) RNA viruses, 132 (16.6%) bacteria, 68 (8.5%) fungi and 23 (2.9%) parasites. We also extracted clinical and laboratory metadata from a subset of the samples (<i>n</i> = 1,164) from 1,053 UCSF patients. Among the 220 infectious diagnoses in this subset, 48 (21.8%) were identified by mNGS alone. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of mNGS testing for CNS infections were 63.1%, 99.6% and 92.9%, respectively. mNGS testing exhibited higher sensitivity (63.1%) than indirect serologic testing (28.8%) and direct detection testing from both CSF (45.9%) and non-CSF (15.0%) samples (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001 for all three comparisons). When only considering diagnoses made by CSF direct detection testing, the sensitivity of mNGS testing increased to 86%. These results justify the routine use of diagnostic mNGS testing for hospitalized patients with suspected CNS infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seven-year performance of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing test for diagnosis of central nervous system infections\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Benoit, Noah Brazer, Mikael de Lorenzi-Tognon, Emily Kelly, Venice Servellita, Miriam Oseguera, Jenny Nguyen, Jack Tang, Charles Omura, Jessica Streithorst, Melissa Hillberg, Danielle Ingebrigtsen, Kelsey Zorn, Michael R. Wilson, Tim Blicharz, Amy P. Wong, Brian O’Donovan, Brad Murray, Steve Miller, Charles Y. Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-024-03275-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an agnostic method for broad-based diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections. Here we analyzed the 7-year performance of clinical CSF mNGS testing of 4,828 samples from June 2016 to April 2023 performed by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) clinical microbiology laboratory. Overall, mNGS testing detected 797 organisms from 697 (14.4%) of 4,828 samples, consisting of 363 (45.5%) DNA viruses, 211 (26.4%) RNA viruses, 132 (16.6%) bacteria, 68 (8.5%) fungi and 23 (2.9%) parasites. We also extracted clinical and laboratory metadata from a subset of the samples (<i>n</i> = 1,164) from 1,053 UCSF patients. Among the 220 infectious diagnoses in this subset, 48 (21.8%) were identified by mNGS alone. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of mNGS testing for CNS infections were 63.1%, 99.6% and 92.9%, respectively. mNGS testing exhibited higher sensitivity (63.1%) than indirect serologic testing (28.8%) and direct detection testing from both CSF (45.9%) and non-CSF (15.0%) samples (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001 for all three comparisons). When only considering diagnoses made by CSF direct detection testing, the sensitivity of mNGS testing increased to 86%. These results justify the routine use of diagnostic mNGS testing for hospitalized patients with suspected CNS infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03275-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03275-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑脊液(CSF)的元基因组新一代测序(mNGS)是广泛诊断中枢神经系统(CNS)感染的不可知方法。在此,我们分析了加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)临床微生物实验室从 2016 年 6 月到 2023 年 4 月对 4828 份样本进行临床 CSF mNGS 检测的 7 年绩效。总体而言,mNGS 检测从 4828 份样本中的 697 份(14.4%)样本中检测出 797 种生物,包括 363 种(45.5%)DNA 病毒、211 种(26.4%)RNA 病毒、132 种(16.6%)细菌、68 种(8.5%)真菌和 23 种(2.9%)寄生虫。我们还从加州大学旧金山分校 1053 名患者的样本子集(n = 1164)中提取了临床和实验室元数据。在该子集的 220 项感染性诊断中,有 48 项(21.8%)仅由 mNGS 鉴定。mNGS 检测对中枢神经系统感染的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 63.1%、99.6% 和 92.9%。mNGS 检测的敏感性(63.1%)高于间接血清学检测(28.8%),也高于 CSF(45.9%)和非 CSF(15.0%)样本的直接检测(三项比较的 P 均为 0.001)。如果只考虑 CSF 直接检测的诊断结果,mNGS 检测的灵敏度则提高到 86%。这些结果证明常规使用 mNGS 检测诊断疑似中枢神经系统感染的住院患者是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Seven-year performance of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing test for diagnosis of central nervous system infections

Seven-year performance of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing test for diagnosis of central nervous system infections

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an agnostic method for broad-based diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections. Here we analyzed the 7-year performance of clinical CSF mNGS testing of 4,828 samples from June 2016 to April 2023 performed by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) clinical microbiology laboratory. Overall, mNGS testing detected 797 organisms from 697 (14.4%) of 4,828 samples, consisting of 363 (45.5%) DNA viruses, 211 (26.4%) RNA viruses, 132 (16.6%) bacteria, 68 (8.5%) fungi and 23 (2.9%) parasites. We also extracted clinical and laboratory metadata from a subset of the samples (n = 1,164) from 1,053 UCSF patients. Among the 220 infectious diagnoses in this subset, 48 (21.8%) were identified by mNGS alone. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of mNGS testing for CNS infections were 63.1%, 99.6% and 92.9%, respectively. mNGS testing exhibited higher sensitivity (63.1%) than indirect serologic testing (28.8%) and direct detection testing from both CSF (45.9%) and non-CSF (15.0%) samples (P < 0.001 for all three comparisons). When only considering diagnoses made by CSF direct detection testing, the sensitivity of mNGS testing increased to 86%. These results justify the routine use of diagnostic mNGS testing for hospitalized patients with suspected CNS infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信