室内饲养生长牛的一系列肠道甲烷排放特征与性能特征之间的关系

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Sean B Crowley, Deirdre C Purfield, Stephen B Conroy, David N Kelly, Ross D Evans, Clodagh V Ryan, Donagh P Berry
{"title":"室内饲养生长牛的一系列肠道甲烷排放特征与性能特征之间的关系","authors":"Sean B Crowley, Deirdre C Purfield, Stephen B Conroy, David N Kelly, Ross D Evans, Clodagh V Ryan, Donagh P Berry","doi":"10.1093/jas/skae346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the multiple definitions currently used to express enteric methane emissions from ruminants, no consensus has been reached on the most appropriate definition. The objective of the present study was to explore alternative trait definitions reflecting animal level differences in enteric methane emissions in growing cattle. It is likely that no single methane trait definition will be best suited to all intended use cases, but at least, knowing the relationships between the different traits may help inform the selection process. The research aimed to understand the complex interrelationships between traditional and novel methane traits and their association with performance traits across multiple breeds and sexes of cattle; also of interest was the extent of variability in daily enteric methane emissions independent of performance traits like feed intake, growth and live-weight. Methane and carbon dioxide data were collected using the Greenfeed system on 939 growing crossbred cattle from a commercial feedlot. Performance traits including feed intake, feeding behavior, liveweight, live animal ultrasound, subjectively scored skeletal and muscular traits, and slaughter data were also available. A total of 13 different methane traits were generated, including (average) daily methane production, five ratio traits and seven residual methane (RMP) traits. The RMP traits were defined as methane production adjusted statistically for different combinations of the performance traits of energy intake, liveweight, average daily gain and carcass weight; terms reflecting systematic effects were also included in the fixed effects linear models. Of the performance traits investigated, liveweight and energy intake individually explained more of the variability in methane production than growth rate or fat. All definitions of RMP were strongly phenotypically correlated with each other (>0.90) as well as with methane production itself (>0.86); the RMP traits were also moderately correlated with the methane ratio traits (>0.57). The dataset included heifers, steers and bulls; bulls were either fed a total mixed ration or ad lib concentrates. When all sexes fed total mixed ration were compared, bulls, on average, emitted the most enteric methane per day of 269.53g, while heifers and steers produced 237.54g and 253.26g, respectively. Breed differences in the methane traits existed, with Limousins, on average, producing the least amount of methane of the breeds investigated. Herefords and Montbéliardes produced 124.50g and 130.77g more methane per day, respectively, than Limousins. The most efficient 10% of test-day records, as defined by daily methane independent of both energy intake and liveweight emitted, on average, 54.60 g/d less methane than animals that were average for daily methane independent of both energy intake and liveweight. This equates to 6.5kg less methane production per animal over a 120-day finishing period for the same feed intake and liveweight.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between a range of enteric methane emission traits and performance traits in indoor-fed growing cattle\",\"authors\":\"Sean B Crowley, Deirdre C Purfield, Stephen B Conroy, David N Kelly, Ross D Evans, Clodagh V Ryan, Donagh P Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jas/skae346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the multiple definitions currently used to express enteric methane emissions from ruminants, no consensus has been reached on the most appropriate definition. The objective of the present study was to explore alternative trait definitions reflecting animal level differences in enteric methane emissions in growing cattle. It is likely that no single methane trait definition will be best suited to all intended use cases, but at least, knowing the relationships between the different traits may help inform the selection process. The research aimed to understand the complex interrelationships between traditional and novel methane traits and their association with performance traits across multiple breeds and sexes of cattle; also of interest was the extent of variability in daily enteric methane emissions independent of performance traits like feed intake, growth and live-weight. Methane and carbon dioxide data were collected using the Greenfeed system on 939 growing crossbred cattle from a commercial feedlot. Performance traits including feed intake, feeding behavior, liveweight, live animal ultrasound, subjectively scored skeletal and muscular traits, and slaughter data were also available. A total of 13 different methane traits were generated, including (average) daily methane production, five ratio traits and seven residual methane (RMP) traits. The RMP traits were defined as methane production adjusted statistically for different combinations of the performance traits of energy intake, liveweight, average daily gain and carcass weight; terms reflecting systematic effects were also included in the fixed effects linear models. Of the performance traits investigated, liveweight and energy intake individually explained more of the variability in methane production than growth rate or fat. All definitions of RMP were strongly phenotypically correlated with each other (>0.90) as well as with methane production itself (>0.86); the RMP traits were also moderately correlated with the methane ratio traits (>0.57). The dataset included heifers, steers and bulls; bulls were either fed a total mixed ration or ad lib concentrates. When all sexes fed total mixed ration were compared, bulls, on average, emitted the most enteric methane per day of 269.53g, while heifers and steers produced 237.54g and 253.26g, respectively. Breed differences in the methane traits existed, with Limousins, on average, producing the least amount of methane of the breeds investigated. Herefords and Montbéliardes produced 124.50g and 130.77g more methane per day, respectively, than Limousins. The most efficient 10% of test-day records, as defined by daily methane independent of both energy intake and liveweight emitted, on average, 54.60 g/d less methane than animals that were average for daily methane independent of both energy intake and liveweight. This equates to 6.5kg less methane production per animal over a 120-day finishing period for the same feed intake and liveweight.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae346\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管目前有多种定义用于表示反刍动物的肠道甲烷排放量,但尚未就最合适的定义达成共识。本研究的目的是探索反映生长牛肠内甲烷排放动物水平差异的替代性状定义。可能没有一个甲烷性状定义最适合所有预期的使用情况,但至少了解不同性状之间的关系有助于为选择过程提供信息。这项研究旨在了解传统甲烷性状和新型甲烷性状之间复杂的相互关系,以及它们与多品种、多性别牛的性能性状之间的关联;同时还关注每日肠道甲烷排放量的变化程度,这种变化与采食量、生长和活重等性能性状无关。使用 Greenfeed 系统收集了来自商业饲养场的 939 头生长中的杂交牛的甲烷和二氧化碳数据。还提供了包括采食量、采食行为、活体重量、活体动物超声波、主观评分的骨骼和肌肉特征在内的性能特征以及屠宰数据。总共生成了 13 个不同的甲烷性状,包括(平均)日甲烷产量、5 个比率性状和 7 个残余甲烷(RMP)性状。残余甲烷性状被定义为根据能量摄入量、活体重量、平均日增重和胴体重量等性能性状的不同组合进行统计调整后的甲烷产量;固定效应线性模型中还包括反映系统效应的项。在所研究的性能性状中,活重和能量摄入量对甲烷产量变化的单独解释要多于生长速度或脂肪。所有 RMP 定义在表型上都有很强的相关性(>0.90),与甲烷产量本身也有相关性(>0.86);RMP 性状与甲烷比率性状也有中度相关性(>0.57)。数据集包括小母牛、小公牛和大公牛;大公牛要么饲喂全混合饲料,要么自由采食精料。在对饲喂全混合日粮的所有性别进行比较时,公牛平均每天排放最多的肠道甲烷为 269.53 克,而母牛和阉牛分别为 237.54 克和 253.26 克。甲烷特性存在品种差异,在调查的品种中,利穆赞牛平均产生的甲烷量最少。牧羊犬和蒙贝利亚德牛的甲烷日产量分别比利木赞牛高 124.50 克和 130.77 克。根据与能量摄入量和活重无关的日甲烷量定义,测试日记录中效率最高的 10%的动物比与能量摄入量和活重无关的日甲烷量处于平均水平的动物平均每天少排放 54.60 克甲烷。这相当于在采食量和活重相同的情况下,每头动物在 120 天的育成期内少产生 6.5 千克甲烷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between a range of enteric methane emission traits and performance traits in indoor-fed growing cattle
Despite the multiple definitions currently used to express enteric methane emissions from ruminants, no consensus has been reached on the most appropriate definition. The objective of the present study was to explore alternative trait definitions reflecting animal level differences in enteric methane emissions in growing cattle. It is likely that no single methane trait definition will be best suited to all intended use cases, but at least, knowing the relationships between the different traits may help inform the selection process. The research aimed to understand the complex interrelationships between traditional and novel methane traits and their association with performance traits across multiple breeds and sexes of cattle; also of interest was the extent of variability in daily enteric methane emissions independent of performance traits like feed intake, growth and live-weight. Methane and carbon dioxide data were collected using the Greenfeed system on 939 growing crossbred cattle from a commercial feedlot. Performance traits including feed intake, feeding behavior, liveweight, live animal ultrasound, subjectively scored skeletal and muscular traits, and slaughter data were also available. A total of 13 different methane traits were generated, including (average) daily methane production, five ratio traits and seven residual methane (RMP) traits. The RMP traits were defined as methane production adjusted statistically for different combinations of the performance traits of energy intake, liveweight, average daily gain and carcass weight; terms reflecting systematic effects were also included in the fixed effects linear models. Of the performance traits investigated, liveweight and energy intake individually explained more of the variability in methane production than growth rate or fat. All definitions of RMP were strongly phenotypically correlated with each other (>0.90) as well as with methane production itself (>0.86); the RMP traits were also moderately correlated with the methane ratio traits (>0.57). The dataset included heifers, steers and bulls; bulls were either fed a total mixed ration or ad lib concentrates. When all sexes fed total mixed ration were compared, bulls, on average, emitted the most enteric methane per day of 269.53g, while heifers and steers produced 237.54g and 253.26g, respectively. Breed differences in the methane traits existed, with Limousins, on average, producing the least amount of methane of the breeds investigated. Herefords and Montbéliardes produced 124.50g and 130.77g more methane per day, respectively, than Limousins. The most efficient 10% of test-day records, as defined by daily methane independent of both energy intake and liveweight emitted, on average, 54.60 g/d less methane than animals that were average for daily methane independent of both energy intake and liveweight. This equates to 6.5kg less methane production per animal over a 120-day finishing period for the same feed intake and liveweight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信