父母参与儿童焦虑症数字认知行为疗法干预的系统性综述

IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Meri M. V. Grajdan, Evren Etel, Lara J. Farrell, Caroline L. Donovan
{"title":"父母参与儿童焦虑症数字认知行为疗法干预的系统性综述","authors":"Meri M. V. Grajdan, Evren Etel, Lara J. Farrell, Caroline L. Donovan","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00505-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an efficacious intervention for child anxiety that has been translated into accessible digital formats, many of which involve parents in treatment. However, the value of parental involvement in treatment is not clearly understood. This systematic review examined characteristics of parental involvement (i.e., format and content of sessions, level of therapist guidance, and parent session compliance) in digital CBT for child anxiety (mean child age ≤ 12 years) and their relation to child outcomes (primary disorder remission, clinician-, parent-, and child-rated anxiety, and global functioning). Systematic searches in CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Scopus up to 14th August 2023, and citation searching, identified 27 articles (as 23 studies) assessing 14 interventions. Two were parent-only programmes for 3–6-year-old children, with the remaining being parent–child programmes targeting older children. Parents were actively involved as coaches/collaborators, assisting their children with anxiety management and exposure, and less often as co-clients working on their own difficulties. Benefits of treatment were observed across interventions, except for one, psychoeducation-based programme. Higher remission rates were more frequently observed in interventions delivered in controlled settings, those with fewer parent-only sessions, or those incorporating more parent- or therapist-led exposure sessions. Most studies were conducted with affluent samples, limiting generalisability, and several received a high risk of bias rating. Future research should examine parent and family related mechanisms of change and modify interventions for improved adherence, such as restricting the number of modules parents are required to complete and teaching key therapeutic strategies such as exposure early in the programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Parental Involvement in Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Interventions for Child Anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Meri M. V. Grajdan, Evren Etel, Lara J. Farrell, Caroline L. Donovan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10567-024-00505-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an efficacious intervention for child anxiety that has been translated into accessible digital formats, many of which involve parents in treatment. However, the value of parental involvement in treatment is not clearly understood. This systematic review examined characteristics of parental involvement (i.e., format and content of sessions, level of therapist guidance, and parent session compliance) in digital CBT for child anxiety (mean child age ≤ 12 years) and their relation to child outcomes (primary disorder remission, clinician-, parent-, and child-rated anxiety, and global functioning). Systematic searches in CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Scopus up to 14th August 2023, and citation searching, identified 27 articles (as 23 studies) assessing 14 interventions. Two were parent-only programmes for 3–6-year-old children, with the remaining being parent–child programmes targeting older children. Parents were actively involved as coaches/collaborators, assisting their children with anxiety management and exposure, and less often as co-clients working on their own difficulties. Benefits of treatment were observed across interventions, except for one, psychoeducation-based programme. Higher remission rates were more frequently observed in interventions delivered in controlled settings, those with fewer parent-only sessions, or those incorporating more parent- or therapist-led exposure sessions. Most studies were conducted with affluent samples, limiting generalisability, and several received a high risk of bias rating. Future research should examine parent and family related mechanisms of change and modify interventions for improved adherence, such as restricting the number of modules parents are required to complete and teaching key therapeutic strategies such as exposure early in the programme.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00505-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00505-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)是一种治疗儿童焦虑症的有效干预方法,已被转化为易于使用的数字格式,其中许多都有家长参与治疗。然而,家长参与治疗的价值并没有得到清楚的认识。本系统性综述研究了家长参与儿童焦虑(平均年龄小于 12 岁)数字化 CBT 治疗的特点(即疗程的形式和内容、治疗师的指导水平以及家长对疗程的依从性)及其与儿童治疗结果(主要障碍缓解、临床医生、家长和儿童评价的焦虑以及整体功能)的关系。截至 2023 年 8 月 14 日,在 CINAHL、Embase、ERIC、PsychINFO、PubMed 和 Scopus 中进行了系统检索,并进行了引文检索,共发现 27 篇文章(作为 23 项研究),评估了 14 项干预措施。其中两项是针对 3-6 岁儿童的家长计划,其余是针对较大儿童的亲子计划。家长作为教练/合作者积极参与其中,协助孩子进行焦虑管理和暴露,但较少作为共同客户解决自身的困难。除了一项以心理教育为基础的项目外,其他干预项目的治疗效果都很好。在有控制的环境中进行的干预、仅由家长进行的治疗次数较少的干预,或包含更多由家长或治疗师主导的暴露治疗的干预,都能观察到较高的缓解率。大多数研究都是以富裕人群为样本进行的,这限制了研究的普遍性,其中几项研究的偏差风险较高。未来的研究应检查与家长和家庭相关的变化机制,并修改干预措施以提高坚持率,例如限制要求家长完成的模块数量,以及在计划早期教授暴露等关键治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Systematic Review of Parental Involvement in Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Interventions for Child Anxiety

A Systematic Review of Parental Involvement in Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Interventions for Child Anxiety

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an efficacious intervention for child anxiety that has been translated into accessible digital formats, many of which involve parents in treatment. However, the value of parental involvement in treatment is not clearly understood. This systematic review examined characteristics of parental involvement (i.e., format and content of sessions, level of therapist guidance, and parent session compliance) in digital CBT for child anxiety (mean child age ≤ 12 years) and their relation to child outcomes (primary disorder remission, clinician-, parent-, and child-rated anxiety, and global functioning). Systematic searches in CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Scopus up to 14th August 2023, and citation searching, identified 27 articles (as 23 studies) assessing 14 interventions. Two were parent-only programmes for 3–6-year-old children, with the remaining being parent–child programmes targeting older children. Parents were actively involved as coaches/collaborators, assisting their children with anxiety management and exposure, and less often as co-clients working on their own difficulties. Benefits of treatment were observed across interventions, except for one, psychoeducation-based programme. Higher remission rates were more frequently observed in interventions delivered in controlled settings, those with fewer parent-only sessions, or those incorporating more parent- or therapist-led exposure sessions. Most studies were conducted with affluent samples, limiting generalisability, and several received a high risk of bias rating. Future research should examine parent and family related mechanisms of change and modify interventions for improved adherence, such as restricting the number of modules parents are required to complete and teaching key therapeutic strategies such as exposure early in the programme.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信