近海地震仪网络和三维地震速度结构模型对近海地震中心矩张量分析的影响:日本海沟俯冲带的应用

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Lina Yamaya, Hisahiko Kubo, Katsuhiko Shiomi, Shunsuke Takemura
{"title":"近海地震仪网络和三维地震速度结构模型对近海地震中心矩张量分析的影响:日本海沟俯冲带的应用","authors":"Lina Yamaya,&nbsp;Hisahiko Kubo,&nbsp;Katsuhiko Shiomi,&nbsp;Shunsuke Takemura","doi":"10.1029/2024JB029944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently, a widespread and densely continuous-recording ocean-bottom seismograph network has been deployed in the Japan Trench subduction zone. Utilizing the offshore network data improves azimuthal station coverage for offshore earthquakes in the Japan Trench subduction zone. It has a potential to obtain centroid moment tensor (CMT) solutions more accurately than conventional analyses using onshore networks and a simple one-dimensional seismic velocity structure model. In this study, we conducted CMT inversion for subduction zone earthquakes that occurred between 1 April 2017, and 31 March 2024, with a moment magnitude range of 5.2–7.0. We used seismograms obtained from both the offshore and onshore networks. We calculated Green's functions using a three-dimensional seismic velocity structure model. Our CMT solutions with thrust-type mechanisms mostly indicated depths and dip angles consistent with the plate interface. For earthquakes in the outer-rise region, our CMT solutions were characterized as normal-fault mechanisms. The joint use of the offshore and onshore networks reduced the estimation errors of the CMT solutions compared with the only use of the onshore network, although the optimal solutions were consistent. The dip angles for the thrust earthquakes determined by our analysis were more consistent with the dip angle of the plate boundary than those determined by conventional CMT analyses. Additionally, we found that the conventional CMT analysis could introduce a systematic bias in depth and magnitude determinations. This finding highlights the importance of an offshore seismograph network and a reliable seismic velocity structure model for CMT inversions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"129 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029944","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Offshore Seismograph Network and 3-D Seismic Velocity Structure Model on Centroid Moment Tensor Analysis for Offshore Earthquakes: Application to the Japan Trench Subduction Zone\",\"authors\":\"Lina Yamaya,&nbsp;Hisahiko Kubo,&nbsp;Katsuhiko Shiomi,&nbsp;Shunsuke Takemura\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB029944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recently, a widespread and densely continuous-recording ocean-bottom seismograph network has been deployed in the Japan Trench subduction zone. Utilizing the offshore network data improves azimuthal station coverage for offshore earthquakes in the Japan Trench subduction zone. It has a potential to obtain centroid moment tensor (CMT) solutions more accurately than conventional analyses using onshore networks and a simple one-dimensional seismic velocity structure model. In this study, we conducted CMT inversion for subduction zone earthquakes that occurred between 1 April 2017, and 31 March 2024, with a moment magnitude range of 5.2–7.0. We used seismograms obtained from both the offshore and onshore networks. We calculated Green's functions using a three-dimensional seismic velocity structure model. Our CMT solutions with thrust-type mechanisms mostly indicated depths and dip angles consistent with the plate interface. For earthquakes in the outer-rise region, our CMT solutions were characterized as normal-fault mechanisms. The joint use of the offshore and onshore networks reduced the estimation errors of the CMT solutions compared with the only use of the onshore network, although the optimal solutions were consistent. The dip angles for the thrust earthquakes determined by our analysis were more consistent with the dip angle of the plate boundary than those determined by conventional CMT analyses. Additionally, we found that the conventional CMT analysis could introduce a systematic bias in depth and magnitude determinations. This finding highlights the importance of an offshore seismograph network and a reliable seismic velocity structure model for CMT inversions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"129 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029944\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029944\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029944","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,在日本海沟俯冲带部署了一个广泛而密集的连续记录海底地震仪网络。利用近海网络数据提高了日本海沟俯冲带近海地震的方位站覆盖率。与使用陆上网络和简单的一维地震速度结构模型进行的传统分析相比,它有可能更准确地获得中心力矩张量(CMT)解。在本研究中,我们对 2017 年 4 月 1 日至 2024 年 3 月 31 日期间发生的矩级范围为 5.2-7.0 的俯冲带地震进行了 CMT 反演。我们使用了从海上和陆上网络获得的地震图。我们使用三维地震速度结构模型计算了格林函数。我们的推力型机制 CMT 解决方案大多显示出与板块界面一致的深度和倾角。对于外隆起区的地震,我们的 CMT 解法被定性为正断层机制。与仅使用陆上网络相比,联合使用海上和陆上网络减少了 CMT 解法的估计误差,尽管最优解是一致的。与传统的 CMT 分析方法相比,我们分析得出的推力地震倾角与板块边界倾角更加一致。此外,我们还发现,传统的 CMT 分析可能会在深度和震级确定方面引入系统性偏差。这一发现凸显了近海地震仪网络和可靠的地震速度结构模型对 CMT 反演的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of the Offshore Seismograph Network and 3-D Seismic Velocity Structure Model on Centroid Moment Tensor Analysis for Offshore Earthquakes: Application to the Japan Trench Subduction Zone

Impact of the Offshore Seismograph Network and 3-D Seismic Velocity Structure Model on Centroid Moment Tensor Analysis for Offshore Earthquakes: Application to the Japan Trench Subduction Zone

Recently, a widespread and densely continuous-recording ocean-bottom seismograph network has been deployed in the Japan Trench subduction zone. Utilizing the offshore network data improves azimuthal station coverage for offshore earthquakes in the Japan Trench subduction zone. It has a potential to obtain centroid moment tensor (CMT) solutions more accurately than conventional analyses using onshore networks and a simple one-dimensional seismic velocity structure model. In this study, we conducted CMT inversion for subduction zone earthquakes that occurred between 1 April 2017, and 31 March 2024, with a moment magnitude range of 5.2–7.0. We used seismograms obtained from both the offshore and onshore networks. We calculated Green's functions using a three-dimensional seismic velocity structure model. Our CMT solutions with thrust-type mechanisms mostly indicated depths and dip angles consistent with the plate interface. For earthquakes in the outer-rise region, our CMT solutions were characterized as normal-fault mechanisms. The joint use of the offshore and onshore networks reduced the estimation errors of the CMT solutions compared with the only use of the onshore network, although the optimal solutions were consistent. The dip angles for the thrust earthquakes determined by our analysis were more consistent with the dip angle of the plate boundary than those determined by conventional CMT analyses. Additionally, we found that the conventional CMT analysis could introduce a systematic bias in depth and magnitude determinations. This finding highlights the importance of an offshore seismograph network and a reliable seismic velocity structure model for CMT inversions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信